FNCJF
Price
$0.05
Change
-$0.01 (-16.67%)
Updated
Jan 17 closing price
Capitalization
15.31M
FPRGF
Price
$0.16
Change
+$0.01 (+6.67%)
Updated
Jan 17 closing price
Capitalization
33.8M
Ad is loading...

FNCJF vs FPRGF

Header iconFNCJF vs FPRGF Comparison
Open Charts FNCJF vs FPRGFBanner chart's image
Fancamp Exploration
Price$0.05
Change-$0.01 (-16.67%)
Volume$11K
Capitalization15.31M
Falco Resources
Price$0.16
Change+$0.01 (+6.67%)
Volume$2K
Capitalization33.8M
FNCJF vs FPRGF Comparison Chart
Loading...
FNCJF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
FPRGF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
FNCJF vs. FPRGF commentary
Jan 19, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FNCJF is a Hold and FPRGF is a Hold.

Ad is loading...
COMPARISON
Comparison
Jan 19, 2025
Stock price -- (FNCJF: $0.05 vs. FPRGF: $0.16)
Brand notoriety: FNCJF and FPRGF are both not notable
Both companies represent the Other Metals/Minerals industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: FNCJF: 80% vs. FPRGF: 5%
Market capitalization -- FNCJF: $15.31M vs. FPRGF: $33.8M
FNCJF [@Other Metals/Minerals] is valued at $15.31M. FPRGF’s [@Other Metals/Minerals] market capitalization is $33.8M. The market cap for tickers in the [@Other Metals/Minerals] industry ranges from $223.12B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Other Metals/Minerals] industry is $2.95B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

FNCJF’s FA Score shows that 0 FA rating(s) are green whileFPRGF’s FA Score has 0 green FA rating(s).

  • FNCJF’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
  • FPRGF’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
According to our system of comparison, both FNCJF and FPRGF are a bad buy in the long-term.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

FNCJF’s TA Score shows that 2 TA indicator(s) are bullish while FPRGF’s TA Score has 2 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • FNCJF’s TA Score: 2 bullish, 1 bearish.
  • FPRGF’s TA Score: 2 bullish, 3 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, FNCJF is a better buy in the short-term than FPRGF.

Price Growth

FNCJF (@Other Metals/Minerals) experienced а +4.25% price change this week, while FPRGF (@Other Metals/Minerals) price change was +9.59% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Other Metals/Minerals industry was +3.34%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +8.98%, and the average quarterly price growth was -1.96%.

Industries' Descriptions

@Other Metals/Minerals (+3.34% weekly)

The category includes companies that explore for, mine and extract metals, such as copper, diamonds, nickel, cobalt ore, lead, zinc and uranium. BHP, Rio Tinto and Southern Copper Corporation are major players in this space.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FPRGF($33.8M) has a higher market cap than FNCJF($15.3M). FNCJF YTD gains are higher at: 4.251 vs. FPRGF (-13.368). FNCJF has higher annual earnings (EBITDA): 14.6M vs. FPRGF (-2.32M). FNCJF has more cash in the bank: 26.3M vs. FPRGF (6.78M). FNCJF has less debt than FPRGF: FNCJF (150K) vs FPRGF (32.3M). FNCJF (0) and FPRGF (0) have equivalent revenues.
FNCJFFPRGFFNCJF / FPRGF
Capitalization15.3M33.8M45%
EBITDA14.6M-2.32M-629%
Gain YTD4.251-13.368-32%
P/E Ratio1.14N/A-
Revenue00-
Total Cash26.3M6.78M388%
Total Debt150K32.3M0%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
FNCJF vs FPRGF: Fundamental Ratings
FNCJF
FPRGF
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
5050
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
69
Overvalued
40
Fair valued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
100100
SMR RATING
1..100
6192
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
4464
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
97100
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
n/an/a

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

FPRGF's Valuation (40) in the null industry is in the same range as FNCJF (69). This means that FPRGF’s stock grew similarly to FNCJF’s over the last 12 months.

FPRGF's Profit vs Risk Rating (100) in the null industry is in the same range as FNCJF (100). This means that FPRGF’s stock grew similarly to FNCJF’s over the last 12 months.

FNCJF's SMR Rating (61) in the null industry is in the same range as FPRGF (92). This means that FNCJF’s stock grew similarly to FPRGF’s over the last 12 months.

FNCJF's Price Growth Rating (44) in the null industry is in the same range as FPRGF (64). This means that FNCJF’s stock grew similarly to FPRGF’s over the last 12 months.

FNCJF's P/E Growth Rating (97) in the null industry is in the same range as FPRGF (100). This means that FNCJF’s stock grew similarly to FPRGF’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
FNCJFFPRGF
RSI
ODDS (%)
N/A
N/A
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 12 days ago
64%
Bearish Trend 12 days ago
90%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 12 days ago
57%
Bearish Trend 12 days ago
90%
MACD
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bearish Trend 12 days ago
88%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 12 days ago
50%
Bearish Trend 12 days ago
90%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 12 days ago
50%
Bearish Trend 12 days ago
90%
Advances
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bullish Trend 17 days ago
76%
Declines
ODDS (%)
N/A
N/A
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bullish Trend 12 days ago
90%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 12 days ago
48%
N/A
View a ticker or compare two or three
Ad is loading...
FNCJF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
FPRGF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
MFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
CFNCX83.380.86
+1.04%
American Funds Fundamental Invs 529C
JDWAX113.521.03
+0.92%
Janus Henderson Global Research A
VYCCX24.540.21
+0.86%
Voya Corporate Leaders 100 I
CCPAX14.030.10
+0.72%
FS Chiron Capital Allocation A
TFESX10.790.04
+0.37%
Templeton Instl Intl Eq Ser Service

FNCJF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that FNCJF and OMHLF have been poorly correlated (+22% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that FNCJF and OMHLF's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To FNCJF
1D Price
Change %
FNCJF100%
-8.04%
OMHLF - FNCJF
22%
Poorly correlated
N/A
FQVLF - FNCJF
16%
Poorly correlated
+1.28%
FPOCF - FNCJF
6%
Poorly correlated
-1.37%
FPRGF - FNCJF
6%
Poorly correlated
+11.29%
FDCFF - FNCJF
4%
Poorly correlated
+5.26%
More

FPRGF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that FPRGF and DCNNF have been poorly correlated (+25% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that FPRGF and DCNNF's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To FPRGF
1D Price
Change %
FPRGF100%
+11.29%
DCNNF - FPRGF
25%
Poorly correlated
N/A
CVWFF - FPRGF
25%
Poorly correlated
N/A
KGLLF - FPRGF
24%
Poorly correlated
N/A
CASXF - FPRGF
24%
Poorly correlated
N/A
SAIDF - FPRGF
23%
Poorly correlated
N/A
More