FNCJF
Price
$0.06
Change
-$0.01 (-14.29%)
Updated
Sep 5 closing price
Capitalization
15.72M
OMHLF
Price
$0.17
Change
-$0.00 (-0.00%)
Updated
Aug 26 closing price
Capitalization
137.9M
Interact to see
Advertisement

FNCJF vs OMHLF

Header iconFNCJF vs OMHLF Comparison
Open Charts FNCJF vs OMHLFBanner chart's image
Fancamp Exploration
Price$0.06
Change-$0.01 (-14.29%)
Volume$50.2K
Capitalization15.72M
OM Holdings
Price$0.17
Change-$0.00 (-0.00%)
Volume$2.5K
Capitalization137.9M
FNCJF vs OMHLF Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
FNCJF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
OMHLF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
FNCJF vs. OMHLF commentary
Sep 06, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FNCJF is a Hold and OMHLF is a Hold.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Sep 06, 2025
Stock price -- (FNCJF: $0.06 vs. OMHLF: $0.17)
Brand notoriety: FNCJF and OMHLF are both not notable
Both companies represent the Other Metals/Minerals industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: FNCJF: 55% vs. OMHLF: 198%
Market capitalization -- FNCJF: $15.72M vs. OMHLF: $137.9M
FNCJF [@Other Metals/Minerals] is valued at $15.72M. OMHLF’s [@Other Metals/Minerals] market capitalization is $137.9M. The market cap for tickers in the [@Other Metals/Minerals] industry ranges from $223.12B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Other Metals/Minerals] industry is $2.28B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

FNCJF’s FA Score shows that 0 FA rating(s) are green whileOMHLF’s FA Score has 1 green FA rating(s).

  • FNCJF’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
  • OMHLF’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
According to our system of comparison, OMHLF is a better buy in the long-term than FNCJF.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

FNCJF’s TA Score shows that 3 TA indicator(s) are bullish while OMHLF’s TA Score has 0 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • FNCJF’s TA Score: 3 bullish, 5 bearish.
  • OMHLF’s TA Score: 0 bullish, 3 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, OMHLF is a better buy in the short-term than FNCJF.

Price Growth

FNCJF (@Other Metals/Minerals) experienced а -1.42% price change this week, while OMHLF (@Other Metals/Minerals) price change was 0.00% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Other Metals/Minerals industry was +4.20%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +9.26%, and the average quarterly price growth was +121.89%.

Industries' Descriptions

@Other Metals/Minerals (+4.20% weekly)

The category includes companies that explore for, mine and extract metals, such as copper, diamonds, nickel, cobalt ore, lead, zinc and uranium. BHP, Rio Tinto and Southern Copper Corporation are major players in this space.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
OMHLF($138M) has a higher market cap than FNCJF($15.7M). OMHLF has higher P/E ratio than FNCJF: OMHLF (13.58) vs FNCJF (2.95). FNCJF YTD gains are higher at: 29.717 vs. OMHLF (-28.082). OMHLF has higher annual earnings (EBITDA): 49.3M vs. FNCJF (1.75M). OMHLF has higher revenues than FNCJF: OMHLF (578M) vs FNCJF (0).
FNCJFOMHLFFNCJF / OMHLF
Capitalization15.7M138M11%
EBITDA1.75M49.3M4%
Gain YTD29.717-28.082-106%
P/E Ratio2.9513.5822%
Revenue0578M-
Total Cash24.1MN/A-
Total DebtN/AN/A-
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
FNCJF: Fundamental Ratings
FNCJF
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
82
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
74
Overvalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
100
SMR RATING
1..100
71
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
55
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
95
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
48

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
FNCJFOMHLF
RSI
ODDS (%)
N/A
N/A
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
60%
N/A
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
59%
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
10%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
60%
N/A
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
48%
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
20%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
50%
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
10%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 29 days ago
62%
N/A
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 10 days ago
45%
N/A
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
N/A
N/A
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
43%
N/A
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
FNCJF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
OMHLF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
STOCK / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
ESAB117.801.38
+1.19%
ESAB Corp
ANDE41.40-0.09
-0.22%
Andersons
REFR1.29-0.01
-0.77%
Research Frontiers
WEYS30.87-0.59
-1.88%
Weyco Group
MA584.22-11.42
-1.92%
Mastercard

FNCJF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that FNCJF and OMHLF have been poorly correlated (+22% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that FNCJF and OMHLF's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To FNCJF
1D Price
Change %
FNCJF100%
-4.22%
OMHLF - FNCJF
22%
Poorly correlated
N/A
FPOCF - FNCJF
6%
Poorly correlated
+0.83%
FPRGF - FNCJF
6%
Poorly correlated
+7.89%
FDCFF - FNCJF
4%
Poorly correlated
N/A
FOSYF - FNCJF
3%
Poorly correlated
-7.58%
More

OMHLF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that OMHLF and CASXF have been poorly correlated (+30% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that OMHLF and CASXF's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To OMHLF
1D Price
Change %
OMHLF100%
N/A
CASXF - OMHLF
30%
Poorly correlated
N/A
SRHYY - OMHLF
22%
Poorly correlated
-14.46%
FNCJF - OMHLF
21%
Poorly correlated
-4.22%
NBMFF - OMHLF
20%
Poorly correlated
-8.34%
SGML - OMHLF
3%
Poorly correlated
+6.46%
More