Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FNCMX vs FSPGX
FNCMX vs FSPGX Comparison
Open Charts FNCMX vs FSPGX
Fidelity Nasdaq Composite Index
Price$261.98
Change+$2.67 (+1.03%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets19.67B
Fidelity Large Cap Growth Idx
Price$41.93
Change+$0.47 (+1.13%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets37.26B
FNCMX vs FSPGX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FNCMX vs. FSPGX commentary
Jul 04, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FNCMX is a StrongBuy and FSPGX is a StrongBuy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FSPGX has more cash in the bank: 37.3B vs. FNCMX (19.7B). FNCMX pays higher dividends than FSPGX: FNCMX (0.57) vs FSPGX (0.35). FNCMX was incepted earlier than FSPGX: FNCMX (22 years) vs FSPGX (9 years). FNCMX (0.30) is less costly to investors than FSPGX (0.04). FSPGX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 15.00 vs. FNCMX (2.00). FNCMX (0) and FSPGX (0) have matching initial minimum investment requirements. FSPGX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 13.91 vs. FNCMX (12.80). FSPGX return over 5 years is better than : 120.29 vs. FNCMX (108.24).
| FNCMX | FSPGX | FNCMX / FSPGX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.29 | 0.04 | 829% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.30 | 0.04 | 857% |
| Fund Existence | 22 years | 9 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 5.940 | 5.846 | 102% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 0 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 19.7B | 37.3B | 53% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.57 | 0.35 | 164% |
| Returns for 1 year | 12.80 | 13.91 | 92% |
| Returns for 3 years | 88.35 | 96.39 | 92% |
| Returns for 5 years | 108.24 | 120.29 | 90% |
| Returns for 10 years | 306.60 | N/A | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement