FNCSF
Price
$5.38
Change
+$0.01 (+0.19%)
Updated
Jul 24 closing price
Capitalization
172.5M
WNDLF
Price
$97.73
Change
-$0.47 (-0.48%)
Updated
Jun 16 closing price
Capitalization
4.3B
Interact to see
Advertisement

FNCSF vs WNDLF

Header iconFNCSF vs WNDLF Comparison
Open Charts FNCSF vs WNDLFBanner chart's image
North American Financial 15 Split
Price$5.38
Change+$0.01 (+0.19%)
Volume$725
Capitalization172.5M
Wendel
Price$97.73
Change-$0.47 (-0.48%)
Volume$61
Capitalization4.3B
FNCSF vs WNDLF Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
FNCSF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
WNDLF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
FNCSF vs. WNDLF commentary
Jul 27, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FNCSF is a Buy and WNDLF is a Hold.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Jul 27, 2025
Stock price -- (FNCSF: $5.38 vs. WNDLF: $97.73)
Brand notoriety: FNCSF and WNDLF are both not notable
Both companies represent the Investment Managers industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: FNCSF: 33% vs. WNDLF: 98%
Market capitalization -- FNCSF: $172.5M vs. WNDLF: $4.3B
FNCSF [@Investment Managers] is valued at $172.5M. WNDLF’s [@Investment Managers] market capitalization is $4.3B. The market cap for tickers in the [@Investment Managers] industry ranges from $124.17B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Investment Managers] industry is $6.22B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

FNCSF’s FA Score shows that 2 FA rating(s) are green whileWNDLF’s FA Score has 1 green FA rating(s).

  • FNCSF’s FA Score: 2 green, 3 red.
  • WNDLF’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
According to our system of comparison, FNCSF is a better buy in the long-term than WNDLF.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

FNCSF’s TA Score shows that 5 TA indicator(s) are bullish while WNDLF’s TA Score has 3 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • FNCSF’s TA Score: 5 bullish, 3 bearish.
  • WNDLF’s TA Score: 3 bullish, 3 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, FNCSF is a better buy in the short-term than WNDLF.

Price Growth

FNCSF (@Investment Managers) experienced а +3.46% price change this week, while WNDLF (@Investment Managers) price change was 0.00% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Investment Managers industry was +0.66%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +8.49%, and the average quarterly price growth was +15.57%.

Industries' Descriptions

@Investment Managers (+0.66% weekly)

Investment Managers manage financial assets and other investments of clients. Management includes designing a short- or long-term strategy for buying/holding and selling of portfolio holdings. It can also include tax services and other aspects of financial planning as well. While it is perceived that the industry is faced with growing competition from robo-advisors/digital platforms and passive/ index-tracking funds, many investors still find value in actively managed in-person services that investment management companies often emphasize on. At the same time, many wealth managers are also incorporating digital initiatives/low cost options in addition to their in-person customized services. Their main sources of revenues are fees as a percentage of assets under management, in addition to a certain portion of clients’ gains from asset appreciation. BlackRock, Inc., Blackstone Group Inc and Brookfield Asset Management are some of the major investment management companies.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
WNDLF($4.3B) has a higher market cap than FNCSF($173M). WNDLF has higher P/E ratio than FNCSF: WNDLF (15.67) vs FNCSF (1.47). FNCSF YTD gains are higher at: 7.600 vs. WNDLF (2.192). WNDLF has higher revenues than FNCSF: WNDLF (8.91B) vs FNCSF (-3.82M).
FNCSFWNDLFFNCSF / WNDLF
Capitalization173M4.3B4%
EBITDAN/A1.7B-
Gain YTD7.6002.192347%
P/E Ratio1.4715.679%
Revenue-3.82M8.91B-0%
Total CashN/A3.36B-
Total DebtN/A6.24B-
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
FNCSF vs WNDLF: Fundamental Ratings
FNCSF
WNDLF
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
3648
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
1
Undervalued
16
Undervalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
6193
SMR RATING
1..100
1795
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
4457
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
9198
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
n/an/a

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

FNCSF's Valuation (1) in the null industry is in the same range as WNDLF (16). This means that FNCSF’s stock grew similarly to WNDLF’s over the last 12 months.

FNCSF's Profit vs Risk Rating (61) in the null industry is in the same range as WNDLF (93). This means that FNCSF’s stock grew similarly to WNDLF’s over the last 12 months.

FNCSF's SMR Rating (17) in the null industry is significantly better than the same rating for WNDLF (95). This means that FNCSF’s stock grew significantly faster than WNDLF’s over the last 12 months.

FNCSF's Price Growth Rating (44) in the null industry is in the same range as WNDLF (57). This means that FNCSF’s stock grew similarly to WNDLF’s over the last 12 months.

FNCSF's P/E Growth Rating (91) in the null industry is in the same range as WNDLF (98). This means that FNCSF’s stock grew similarly to WNDLF’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
FNCSFWNDLF
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 5 days ago
61%
N/A
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
60%
Bullish Trend 5 days ago
33%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
53%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
38%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
61%
N/A
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
56%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
39%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
48%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
37%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
39%
N/A
Declines
ODDS (%)
N/A
N/A
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
50%
N/A
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
48%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
43%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
FNCSF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
WNDLF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
MFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
GTSCX33.140.23
+0.70%
Glenmede Small Cap Equity Instl
RAFEX44.980.18
+0.40%
American Funds AMCAP R4
CAABX26.650.09
+0.34%
ClearBridge Sustainability Leaders C
VMNFX13.190.04
+0.30%
Vanguard Market Neutral Inv
EMGCX24.88-0.16
-0.64%
Allspring Emerging Markets Equity C

FNCSF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that FNCSF and WNDLF have been poorly correlated (+28% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that FNCSF and WNDLF's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To FNCSF
1D Price
Change %
FNCSF100%
N/A
WNDLF - FNCSF
28%
Poorly correlated
N/A
APAM - FNCSF
27%
Poorly correlated
+0.32%
AMG - FNCSF
27%
Poorly correlated
+2.18%
SLFPY - FNCSF
25%
Poorly correlated
N/A
CNS - FNCSF
25%
Poorly correlated
-1.43%
More

WNDLF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that WNDLF and FNCSF have been poorly correlated (+28% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that WNDLF and FNCSF's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To WNDLF
1D Price
Change %
WNDLF100%
N/A
FNCSF - WNDLF
28%
Poorly correlated
N/A
FFXDF - WNDLF
27%
Poorly correlated
+0.19%
BBUC - WNDLF
23%
Poorly correlated
+0.22%
GEG - WNDLF
20%
Poorly correlated
+1.40%
IVTBF - WNDLF
13%
Poorly correlated
N/A
More