73 days until earnings call
Ad is loading...
FNDA vs SATS
FNDA vs SATS Comparison
Open Charts FNDA vs SATS
Schwab Fundamental U.S. Small CompanyETF
Price$29.29
Change-$0.69 (-2.30%)
Volume$735.06K
Net Assets9.34B
EchoStar
Price$29.57
Change-$0.60 (-1.99%)
Volume$1.46M
Capitalization3.87B
FNDA vs SATS Comparison Chart
Loading...
Show more...
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FNDA vs. SATS commentary
Feb 23, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FNDA is a Hold and SATS is a Hold.
SUMMARIES
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
SATS: Fundamental Ratings
SATS | ||
|---|---|---|
OUTLOOK RATING 1..100 | 10 | |
VALUATION overvalued / fair valued / undervalued 1..100 | 39 Fair valued | |
PROFIT vs RISK RATING 1..100 | 100 | |
SMR RATING 1..100 | 94 | |
PRICE GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 37 | |
P/E GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 28 | |
SEASONALITY SCORE 1..100 | n/a |
Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.
TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
| FNDA | SATS | |
|---|---|---|
| RSI ODDS (%) | N/A | 2 days ago 90% |
| Stochastic ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 87% | 2 days ago 82% |
| Momentum ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 78% | 2 days ago 65% |
| MACD ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 75% | 2 days ago 78% |
| TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 81% | 2 days ago 72% |
| TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 82% | 2 days ago 65% |
| Advances ODDS (%) | 17 days ago 85% | 5 days ago 70% |
| Declines ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 81% | 12 days ago 77% |
| BollingerBands ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 90% | 2 days ago 90% |
| Aroon ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 82% | 2 days ago 69% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Ad is loading...
Show more...
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
FNDA and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, FNDA has been loosely correlated with RCL. These tickers have moved in lockstep 44% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if FNDA jumps, then RCL could also see price increases.
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To FNDA | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| FNDA | 100% | -2.30% | ||
| RCL - FNDA | 44% Loosely correlated | -3.95% | ||
| AGO - FNDA | 41% Loosely correlated | -1.34% | ||
| COIN - FNDA | 38% Loosely correlated | -8.27% | ||
| SATS - FNDA | 38% Loosely correlated | -1.99% | ||
| XPO - FNDA | 37% Loosely correlated | -5.91% | ||
More | ||||
SATS and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor tells us that SATS and CLFD have been poorly correlated (+32% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that SATS and CLFD's prices will move in lockstep.
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To SATS | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| SATS | 100% | -1.99% | ||
| CLFD - SATS | 32% Poorly correlated | -2.39% | ||
| ADTN - SATS | 32% Poorly correlated | -5.98% | ||
| CRDO - SATS | 30% Poorly correlated | -6.31% | ||
| ERIC - SATS | 27% Poorly correlated | -1.25% | ||
| BDC - SATS | 26% Poorly correlated | -1.83% | ||
More | ||||