Ad is loading...
FNDA vs SMDV
FNDA vs SMDV Comparison
Open Charts FNDA vs SMDV
Schwab Fundamental U.S. Small CompanyETF
Price$27.17
Change+$0.45 (+1.68%)
Volume$1.04M
Net Assets7.95B
ProShares Russell 2000 Dividend Growers
Price$64.29
Change+$1.20 (+1.90%)
Volume$250
Net Assets637.99M
FNDA vs SMDV Comparison Chart
Loading...
Show more...
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FNDA vs. SMDV commentary
May 09, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FNDA is a Buy and SMDV is a Buy.
SUMMARIES
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FNDA has more net assets: 7.95B vs. SMDV (638M). SMDV has a higher annual dividend yield than FNDA: SMDV (-6.216) vs FNDA (-8.352). FNDA was incepted earlier than SMDV: FNDA (12 years) vs SMDV (10 years). FNDA (0.25) has a lower expense ratio than SMDV (0.40). SMDV has a higher turnover FNDA (21.00) vs FNDA (21.00).
| FNDA | SMDV | FNDA / SMDV | |
| Gain YTD | -8.352 | -6.216 | 134% |
| Net Assets | 7.95B | 638M | 1,246% |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.25 | 0.40 | 63% |
| Turnover | 21.00 | 44.00 | 48% |
| Yield | 1.63 | 3.00 | 54% |
| Fund Existence | 12 years | 10 years | - |
TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
| FNDA | SMDV | |
|---|---|---|
| RSI ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 83% | 2 days ago 81% |
| Stochastic ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 87% | 2 days ago 79% |
| Momentum ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 87% | 2 days ago 84% |
| MACD ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 88% | 2 days ago 88% |
| TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 85% | 2 days ago 82% |
| TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 83% | 2 days ago 79% |
| Advances ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 85% | 7 days ago 85% |
| Declines ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 82% | 2 days ago 84% |
| BollingerBands ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 88% | 3 days ago 86% |
| Aroon ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 85% | 2 days ago 77% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Ad is loading...
Show more...
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
SMDV and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, SMDV has been closely correlated with UCB. These tickers have moved in lockstep 88% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if SMDV jumps, then UCB could also see price increases.
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To SMDV | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| SMDV | 100% | -0.41% | ||
| UCB - SMDV | 88% Closely correlated | +0.61% | ||
| UBSI - SMDV | 88% Closely correlated | +0.20% | ||
| AUB - SMDV | 87% Closely correlated | +0.74% | ||
| FRME - SMDV | 87% Closely correlated | +0.98% | ||
| NBTB - SMDV | 86% Closely correlated | -0.07% | ||
More | ||||