Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FNDA vs SMDV
FNDA vs SMDV Comparison
Open Charts FNDA vs SMDV
Schwab Fundamental U.S. Small CompanyETF
Price$31.24
Change+$0.26 (+0.84%)
Volume$621
Net Assets8.95B
ProShares Russell 2000 Dividend Growers
Price$66.39
Change+$0.17 (+0.26%)
Volume$200
Net Assets640.06M
FNDA vs SMDV Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
Show more...
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FNDA vs. SMDV commentary
Oct 08, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FNDA is a StrongBuy and SMDV is a Hold.
SUMMARIES
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FNDA has more net assets: 8.95B vs. SMDV (640M). FNDA has a higher annual dividend yield than SMDV: FNDA (5.129) vs SMDV (-0.337). FNDA was incepted earlier than SMDV: FNDA (12 years) vs SMDV (11 years). FNDA (0.25) has a lower expense ratio than SMDV (0.40). SMDV has a higher turnover FNDA (26.00) vs FNDA (26.00).
| FNDA | SMDV | FNDA / SMDV | |
| Gain YTD | 5.129 | -0.337 | -1,523% |
| Net Assets | 8.95B | 640M | 1,399% |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.25 | 0.40 | 63% |
| Turnover | 26.00 | 44.00 | 59% |
| Yield | 1.27 | 2.62 | 48% |
| Fund Existence | 12 years | 11 years | - |
TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
| FNDA | SMDV | |
|---|---|---|
| RSI ODDS (%) | N/A | N/A |
| Stochastic ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 87% | 2 days ago 81% |
| Momentum ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 82% | 2 days ago 83% |
| MACD ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 90% | 2 days ago 81% |
| TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 80% | 2 days ago 80% |
| TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 82% | 2 days ago 80% |
| Advances ODDS (%) | 6 days ago 85% | 21 days ago 84% |
| Declines ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 80% | 2 days ago 81% |
| BollingerBands ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 90% | N/A |
| Aroon ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 80% | 2 days ago 84% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Show more...
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
FNDA and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, FNDA has been loosely correlated with RCL. These tickers have moved in lockstep 44% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if FNDA jumps, then RCL could also see price increases.
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To FNDA | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| FNDA | 100% | -1.21% | ||
| RCL - FNDA | 44% Loosely correlated | -0.80% | ||
| AGO - FNDA | 41% Loosely correlated | -1.34% | ||
| COIN - FNDA | 38% Loosely correlated | -2.67% | ||
| SATS - FNDA | 38% Loosely correlated | -2.08% | ||
| XPO - FNDA | 37% Loosely correlated | -0.78% | ||
More | ||||
SMDV and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, SMDV has been closely correlated with UBSI. These tickers have moved in lockstep 88% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if SMDV jumps, then UBSI could also see price increases.
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To SMDV | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| SMDV | 100% | -0.65% | ||
| UBSI - SMDV | 88% Closely correlated | -1.25% | ||
| STBA - SMDV | 87% Closely correlated | -1.17% | ||
| UCB - SMDV | 86% Closely correlated | +0.69% | ||
| AUB - SMDV | 86% Closely correlated | -0.44% | ||
| NBTB - SMDV | 86% Closely correlated | -1.10% | ||
More | ||||