Ad is loading...
FNDC vs GVAL
FNDC vs GVAL Comparison
Open Charts FNDC vs GVAL
Schwab Fundamental International SmEqETF
Price$38.00
Change-$0.00 (-0.00%)
Volume$132.1K
Net Assets2.71B
Cambria Global Value ETF
Price$25.59
Change-$0.10 (-0.39%)
Volume$77.36K
Net Assets181.19M
FNDC vs GVAL Comparison Chart
Loading...
Show more...
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FNDC vs. GVAL commentary
May 01, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FNDC is a Buy and GVAL is a Buy.
SUMMARIES
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FNDC has more net assets: 2.71B vs. GVAL (181M). GVAL has a higher annual dividend yield than FNDC: GVAL (22.699) vs FNDC (11.306). FNDC was incepted earlier than GVAL: FNDC (12 years) vs GVAL (11 years). FNDC (0.39) has a lower expense ratio than GVAL (0.64). GVAL has a higher turnover FNDC (22.00) vs FNDC (22.00).
| FNDC | GVAL | FNDC / GVAL | |
| Gain YTD | 11.306 | 22.699 | 50% |
| Net Assets | 2.71B | 181M | 1,499% |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.39 | 0.64 | 61% |
| Turnover | 22.00 | 36.00 | 61% |
| Yield | 3.40 | 3.96 | 86% |
| Fund Existence | 12 years | 11 years | - |
TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
| FNDC | GVAL | |
|---|---|---|
| RSI ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 74% | 1 day ago 90% |
| Stochastic ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 74% | 1 day ago 79% |
| Momentum ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 84% | 1 day ago 84% |
| MACD ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 80% | 1 day ago 73% |
| TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 82% | 1 day ago 85% |
| TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 79% | 1 day ago 82% |
| Advances ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 83% | 3 days ago 85% |
| Declines ODDS (%) | 25 days ago 76% | 24 days ago 77% |
| BollingerBands ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 78% | 1 day ago 90% |
| Aroon ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 78% | 1 day ago 68% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Ad is loading...
Show more...
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
FNDC and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, FNDC has been closely correlated with BNT. These tickers have moved in lockstep 73% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if FNDC jumps, then BNT could also see price increases.
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To FNDC | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| FNDC | 100% | N/A | ||
| BNT - FNDC | 73% Closely correlated | +0.39% | ||
| MT - FNDC | 65% Loosely correlated | -1.66% | ||
| CE - FNDC | 62% Loosely correlated | +0.07% | ||
| ERO - FNDC | 62% Loosely correlated | -1.58% | ||
| INTU - FNDC | 61% Loosely correlated | +0.69% | ||
More | ||||
GVAL and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, GVAL has been loosely correlated with SAN. These tickers have moved in lockstep 54% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if GVAL jumps, then SAN could also see price increases.
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To GVAL | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| GVAL | 100% | -0.37% | ||
| SAN - GVAL | 54% Loosely correlated | -3.91% | ||
| FER - GVAL | 51% Loosely correlated | +2.54% | ||
| ATS - GVAL | 49% Loosely correlated | -0.16% | ||
| SHEL - GVAL | 49% Loosely correlated | -1.57% | ||
| RIO - GVAL | 48% Loosely correlated | -2.43% | ||
More | ||||