Ad is loading...
FNDC vs GVAL
FNDC vs GVAL Comparison
Open Charts FNDC vs GVAL
Schwab Fundamental International SmEqETF
Price$36.00
Change-$0.25 (-0.69%)
Volume$105.3K
Net Assets3.19B
Cambria Global Value ETF
Price$23.23
Change-$0.10 (-0.43%)
Volume$664
Net Assets99.42M
FNDC vs GVAL Comparison Chart
Loading...
Show more...
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FNDC vs. GVAL commentary
Feb 23, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FNDC is a Buy and GVAL is a Buy.
SUMMARIES
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FNDC has more net assets: 3.19B vs. GVAL (99.4M). GVAL has a higher annual dividend yield than FNDC: GVAL (11.361) vs FNDC (5.448). FNDC was incepted earlier than GVAL: FNDC (12 years) vs GVAL (11 years). GVAL has a higher turnover FNDC (30.00) vs FNDC (30.00).
| FNDC | GVAL | FNDC / GVAL | |
| Gain YTD | 5.448 | 11.361 | 48% |
| Net Assets | 3.19B | 99.4M | 3,211% |
| Total Expense Ratio | N/A | N/A | - |
| Turnover | 30.00 | 94.00 | 32% |
| Yield | 2.82 | 5.44 | 52% |
| Fund Existence | 12 years | 11 years | - |
TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
| FNDC | GVAL | |
|---|---|---|
| RSI ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 76% | 3 days ago 80% |
| Stochastic ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 77% | 3 days ago 73% |
| Momentum ODDS (%) | 4 days ago 83% | 6 days ago 88% |
| MACD ODDS (%) | 4 days ago 80% | N/A |
| TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 76% | 3 days ago 85% |
| TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 80% | 3 days ago 82% |
| Advances ODDS (%) | 6 days ago 84% | 6 days ago 85% |
| Declines ODDS (%) | 21 days ago 78% | 21 days ago 79% |
| BollingerBands ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 86% | 3 days ago 85% |
| Aroon ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 78% | 3 days ago 80% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Ad is loading...
Show more...
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
FNDC and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, FNDC has been closely correlated with BNT. These tickers have moved in lockstep 68% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if FNDC jumps, then BNT could also see price increases.
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To FNDC | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| FNDC | 100% | -0.69% | ||
| BNT - FNDC | 68% Closely correlated | -1.74% | ||
| MT - FNDC | 65% Loosely correlated | -0.71% | ||
| CE - FNDC | 62% Loosely correlated | +0.29% | ||
| INTU - FNDC | 61% Loosely correlated | -2.35% | ||
| CG - FNDC | 60% Loosely correlated | -3.48% | ||
More | ||||
GVAL and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, GVAL has been loosely correlated with SAN. These tickers have moved in lockstep 54% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if GVAL jumps, then SAN could also see price increases.
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To GVAL | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| GVAL | 100% | -0.43% | ||
| SAN - GVAL | 54% Loosely correlated | N/A | ||
| RIO - GVAL | 48% Loosely correlated | -1.18% | ||
| BBVA - GVAL | 45% Loosely correlated | -0.47% | ||
| SHEL - GVAL | 43% Loosely correlated | -2.46% | ||
| ATS - GVAL | 34% Loosely correlated | -1.03% | ||
More | ||||