Ad is loading...
FNDC vs ISVL
FNDC vs ISVL Comparison
Open Charts FNDC vs ISVL
Schwab Fundamental International SmEqETF
Price$34.11
Change+$0.17 (+0.50%)
Volume$176.04K
Net Assets3.02B
iShares Intl Dev Sm Cp Val Fctr ETF
Price$34.40
Change+$0.15 (+0.44%)
Volume$1.73K
Net Assets181.84M
FNDC vs ISVL Comparison Chart
Loading...
Show more...
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FNDC vs. ISVL commentary
Jan 19, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FNDC is a Hold and ISVL is a Hold.
SUMMARIES
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FNDC has more net assets: 3.02B vs. ISVL (182M). ISVL has a higher annual dividend yield than FNDC: ISVL (0.295) vs FNDC (-0.088). FNDC was incepted earlier than ISVL: FNDC (11 years) vs ISVL (4 years). FNDC has a higher turnover ISVL (18.00) vs ISVL (18.00).
| FNDC | ISVL | FNDC / ISVL | |
| Gain YTD | -0.088 | 0.295 | -30% |
| Net Assets | 3.02B | 182M | 1,660% |
| Total Expense Ratio | N/A | N/A | - |
| Turnover | 30.00 | 18.00 | 167% |
| Yield | 2.82 | 3.69 | 76% |
| Fund Existence | 11 years | 4 years | - |
TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
| FNDC | ISVL | |
|---|---|---|
| RSI ODDS (%) | 11 days ago 90% | 11 days ago 90% |
| Stochastic ODDS (%) | 11 days ago 86% | 11 days ago 80% |
| Momentum ODDS (%) | 11 days ago 77% | 11 days ago 73% |
| MACD ODDS (%) | 11 days ago 73% | 11 days ago 77% |
| TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 11 days ago 76% | 11 days ago 79% |
| TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 11 days ago 76% | 11 days ago 74% |
| Advances ODDS (%) | 13 days ago 83% | 13 days ago 82% |
| Declines ODDS (%) | 11 days ago 78% | 11 days ago 77% |
| BollingerBands ODDS (%) | N/A | N/A |
| Aroon ODDS (%) | N/A | N/A |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Ad is loading...
Show more...
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
FNDC and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, FNDC has been closely correlated with BNT. These tickers have moved in lockstep 68% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if FNDC jumps, then BNT could also see price increases.
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To FNDC | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| FNDC | 100% | +0.50% | ||
| BNT - FNDC | 68% Closely correlated | +1.03% | ||
| MT - FNDC | 65% Loosely correlated | +0.35% | ||
| CE - FNDC | 62% Loosely correlated | +0.99% | ||
| INTU - FNDC | 61% Loosely correlated | -0.52% | ||
| CG - FNDC | 60% Loosely correlated | +1.79% | ||
More | ||||
ISVL and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor tells us that ISVL and CELC have been poorly correlated (+18% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that ISVL and CELC's prices will move in lockstep.
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To ISVL | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| ISVL | 100% | +0.41% | ||
| CELC - ISVL | 18% Poorly correlated | -2.84% | ||
| CE - ISVL | 12% Poorly correlated | +0.99% | ||
| IDR - ISVL | 10% Poorly correlated | +5.26% | ||
| CARM - ISVL | 10% Poorly correlated | -3.46% | ||
| MOVE - ISVL | 10% Poorly correlated | -1.92% | ||
More | ||||