Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FNDC vs ISVL
FNDC vs ISVL Comparison
Open Charts FNDC vs ISVL
Schwab Fundamental International SmEqETF
Price$44.99
Change-$0.09 (-0.20%)
Volume$561
Net Assets3.05B
iShares Intl Dev Sm Cp Val Fctr ETF
Price$44.93
Change-$0.02 (-0.04%)
Volume$250
Net Assets49.72M
FNDC vs ISVL Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
Show more...
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FNDC vs. ISVL commentary
Sep 18, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FNDC is a Buy and ISVL is a Buy.
SUMMARIES
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FNDC has more net assets: 3.05B vs. ISVL (49.7M). ISVL (33.234) and FNDC (32.666) have matching annual dividend yield . FNDC was incepted earlier than ISVL: FNDC (12 years) vs ISVL (4 years). ISVL (0.31) has a lower expense ratio than FNDC (0.39). ISVL has a higher turnover FNDC (33.00) vs FNDC (33.00).
| FNDC | ISVL | FNDC / ISVL | |
| Gain YTD | 32.666 | 33.234 | 98% |
| Net Assets | 3.05B | 49.7M | 6,133% |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.39 | 0.31 | 126% |
| Turnover | 33.00 | 63.00 | 52% |
| Yield | 2.64 | 3.18 | 83% |
| Fund Existence | 12 years | 4 years | - |
TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
| FNDC | ISVL | |
|---|---|---|
| RSI ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 79% | 2 days ago 70% |
| Stochastic ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 80% | 2 days ago 84% |
| Momentum ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 82% | 2 days ago 77% |
| MACD ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 88% | 2 days ago 79% |
| TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 83% | 2 days ago 82% |
| TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 80% | 2 days ago 76% |
| Advances ODDS (%) | 11 days ago 84% | 3 days ago 84% |
| Declines ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 77% | 9 days ago 75% |
| BollingerBands ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 72% | 2 days ago 69% |
| Aroon ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 79% | 2 days ago 74% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Show more...
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
FNDC and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, FNDC has been closely correlated with ING. These tickers have moved in lockstep 67% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if FNDC jumps, then ING could also see price increases.
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To FNDC | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| FNDC | 100% | -0.13% | ||
| ING - FNDC | 67% Closely correlated | -0.35% | ||
| MT - FNDC | 65% Loosely correlated | -1.04% | ||
| BNT - FNDC | 64% Loosely correlated | -0.63% | ||
| FER - FNDC | 62% Loosely correlated | +1.09% | ||
| MFG - FNDC | 62% Loosely correlated | -0.15% | ||
More | ||||
ISVL and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor tells us that ISVL and LAND have been poorly correlated (+20% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that ISVL and LAND's prices will move in lockstep.
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To ISVL | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| ISVL | 100% | -0.70% | ||
| LAND - ISVL | 20% Poorly correlated | +0.67% | ||
| SON - ISVL | 19% Poorly correlated | +0.47% | ||
| CELC - ISVL | 18% Poorly correlated | +2.88% | ||
| K - ISVL | 15% Poorly correlated | -0.97% | ||
| PETS - ISVL | 14% Poorly correlated | -1.24% | ||
More | ||||