Intraday BUY SELL Signals
Intraday BUY SELL Signals
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FNDC vs ISVL
FNDC vs ISVL Comparison
Open Charts FNDC vs ISVL
Schwab Fundamental International SmEqETF
Price$43.56
Change-$0.00 (-0.00%)
Volume$191
Net Assets2.96B
iShares Intl Dev Sm Cp Val Fctr ETF
Price$44.12
Change-$0.09 (-0.20%)
Volume$522
Net Assets66.95M
FNDC vs ISVL Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FNDC vs. ISVL commentary
Nov 20, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FNDC is a Hold and ISVL is a Hold.
SUMMARIES
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FNDC has more net assets: 2.96B vs. ISVL (66.9M). ISVL has a higher annual dividend yield than FNDC: ISVL (31.031) vs FNDC (28.193). FNDC was incepted earlier than ISVL: FNDC (12 years) vs ISVL (5 years). ISVL (0.31) has a lower expense ratio than FNDC (0.39). ISVL has a higher turnover FNDC (33.00) vs FNDC (33.00).
| FNDC | ISVL | FNDC / ISVL | |
| Gain YTD | 28.193 | 31.031 | 91% |
| Net Assets | 2.96B | 66.9M | 4,428% |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.39 | 0.31 | 126% |
| Turnover | 33.00 | 63.00 | 52% |
| Yield | 2.61 | 3.12 | 84% |
| Fund Existence | 12 years | 5 years | - |
TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
| FNDC | ISVL | |
|---|---|---|
| RSI ODDS (%) | N/A | N/A |
| Stochastic ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 79% | 2 days ago 80% |
| Momentum ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 74% | 2 days ago 82% |
| MACD ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 82% | 2 days ago 78% |
| TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 76% | 2 days ago 76% |
| TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 74% | 2 days ago 73% |
| Advances ODDS (%) | 8 days ago 83% | 8 days ago 85% |
| Declines ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 77% | 2 days ago 74% |
| BollingerBands ODDS (%) | N/A | 2 days ago 90% |
| Aroon ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 77% | 2 days ago 83% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers
FNDC and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, FNDC has been loosely correlated with ING. These tickers have moved in lockstep 66% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if FNDC jumps, then ING could also see price increases.
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To FNDC | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| FNDC | 100% | -1.07% | ||
| ING - FNDC | 66% Loosely correlated | -1.98% | ||
| MT - FNDC | 65% Loosely correlated | +0.08% | ||
| BNT - FNDC | 64% Loosely correlated | +1.38% | ||
| MFG - FNDC | 64% Loosely correlated | -3.39% | ||
| FER - FNDC | 62% Loosely correlated | -0.58% | ||
More | ||||
ISVL and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor tells us that ISVL and LAND have been poorly correlated (+26% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that ISVL and LAND's prices will move in lockstep.
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To ISVL | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| ISVL | 100% | -0.88% | ||
| LAND - ISVL | 26% Poorly correlated | -0.11% | ||
| CIX - ISVL | 19% Poorly correlated | +0.80% | ||
| SON - ISVL | 18% Poorly correlated | -0.65% | ||
| CELC - ISVL | 18% Poorly correlated | -0.67% | ||
| WFG - ISVL | 17% Poorly correlated | -1.40% | ||
More | ||||