Ad is loading...
FNDF vs ICOW
FNDF vs ICOW Comparison
Open Charts FNDF vs ICOW
Schwab Fundamental International Eq ETF
Price$35.84
Change+$0.31 (+0.87%)
Volume$4.69K
Net Assets14.1B
Pacer Dev Mkts Intl Csh Cows 100 ETF
Price$30.93
Change+$0.16 (+0.52%)
Volume$2.03K
Net Assets1.07B
FNDF vs ICOW Comparison Chart
Loading...
Show more...
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FNDF vs. ICOW commentary
Mar 04, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FNDF is a Hold and ICOW is a Hold.
SUMMARIES
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FNDF has more net assets: 14.1B vs. ICOW (1.07B). FNDF has a higher annual dividend yield than ICOW: FNDF (6.986) vs ICOW (5.413). FNDF was incepted earlier than ICOW: FNDF (12 years) vs ICOW (8 years). ICOW has a higher turnover FNDF (15.00) vs FNDF (15.00).
| FNDF | ICOW | FNDF / ICOW | |
| Gain YTD | 6.986 | 5.413 | 129% |
| Net Assets | 14.1B | 1.07B | 1,324% |
| Total Expense Ratio | N/A | N/A | - |
| Turnover | 15.00 | 59.00 | 25% |
| Yield | 3.24 | 3.64 | 89% |
| Fund Existence | 12 years | 8 years | - |
TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
| FNDF | ICOW | |
|---|---|---|
| RSI ODDS (%) | 4 days ago 78% | 4 days ago 86% |
| Stochastic ODDS (%) | 4 days ago 80% | 4 days ago 83% |
| Momentum ODDS (%) | 4 days ago 81% | 4 days ago 78% |
| MACD ODDS (%) | 4 days ago 73% | 4 days ago 75% |
| TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 4 days ago 77% | 4 days ago 75% |
| TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 4 days ago 77% | 4 days ago 79% |
| Advances ODDS (%) | 6 days ago 82% | 7 days ago 82% |
| Declines ODDS (%) | 4 days ago 79% | 4 days ago 73% |
| BollingerBands ODDS (%) | 4 days ago 85% | 4 days ago 84% |
| Aroon ODDS (%) | 4 days ago 74% | 4 days ago 82% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Ad is loading...
Show more...
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
FNDF and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, FNDF has been closely correlated with STM. These tickers have moved in lockstep 75% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if FNDF jumps, then STM could also see price increases.
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To FNDF | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| FNDF | 100% | -0.20% | ||
| STM - FNDF | 75% Closely correlated | +0.94% | ||
| BNT - FNDF | 74% Closely correlated | +1.38% | ||
| BN - FNDF | 72% Closely correlated | +1.88% | ||
| BAM - FNDF | 72% Closely correlated | +1.45% | ||
| BNS - FNDF | 68% Closely correlated | -0.12% | ||
More | ||||
ICOW and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, ICOW has been closely correlated with BHP. These tickers have moved in lockstep 76% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if ICOW jumps, then BHP could also see price increases.
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To ICOW | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| ICOW | 100% | -0.42% | ||
| BHP - ICOW | 76% Closely correlated | -1.78% | ||
| RIO - ICOW | 72% Closely correlated | -0.25% | ||
| TTE - ICOW | 66% Loosely correlated | +0.30% | ||
| CNQ - ICOW | 64% Loosely correlated | -0.14% | ||
| MT - ICOW | 62% Loosely correlated | -2.26% | ||
More | ||||