Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FNDF vs ICOW
FNDF vs ICOW Comparison
Open Charts FNDF vs ICOW
Schwab Fundamental International Eq ETF
Price$41.30
Change-$0.03 (-0.07%)
Volume$870.3K
Net Assets16.88B
Pacer Dev Mkts Intl Csh Cows 100 ETF
Price$35.07
Change-$0.10 (-0.28%)
Volume$53.92K
Net Assets1.19B
FNDF vs ICOW Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
Show more...
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FNDF vs. ICOW commentary
Jul 27, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FNDF is a Hold and ICOW is a Hold.
SUMMARIES
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FNDF has more net assets: 16.9B vs. ICOW (1.19B). FNDF has a higher annual dividend yield than ICOW: FNDF (25.034) vs ICOW (21.967). FNDF was incepted earlier than ICOW: FNDF (12 years) vs ICOW (8 years). FNDF (0.25) has a lower expense ratio than ICOW (0.65). ICOW has a higher turnover FNDF (12.00) vs FNDF (12.00).
| FNDF | ICOW | FNDF / ICOW | |
| Gain YTD | 25.034 | 21.967 | 114% |
| Net Assets | 16.9B | 1.19B | 1,418% |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.25 | 0.65 | 38% |
| Turnover | 12.00 | 79.00 | 15% |
| Yield | 3.07 | 2.18 | 141% |
| Fund Existence | 12 years | 8 years | - |
TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
| FNDF | ICOW | |
|---|---|---|
| RSI ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 77% | 2 days ago 78% |
| Stochastic ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 69% | 2 days ago 79% |
| Momentum ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 84% | 2 days ago 89% |
| MACD ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 90% | 2 days ago 90% |
| TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 81% | 2 days ago 82% |
| TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 77% | 2 days ago 79% |
| Advances ODDS (%) | 4 days ago 82% | 4 days ago 82% |
| Declines ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 79% | 2 days ago 73% |
| BollingerBands ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 69% | 2 days ago 87% |
| Aroon ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 75% | 2 days ago 81% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Show more...
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
| 1 Day | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| MFs / NAME | Price $ | Chg $ | Chg % |
| LVOTX | 20.10 | 0.17 | +0.85% |
| Lord Abbett Value Opportunities R5 | |||
| STSGX | 12.65 | 0.10 | +0.80% |
| American Beacon Stephens Sm Cp Gr Inv | |||
| JIAFX | 9.48 | 0.01 | +0.11% |
| JHancock Multi-Asset High Income A | |||
| IHOSX | 22.48 | -0.06 | -0.27% |
| Hartford International Opportunities R4 | |||
| AEPGX | 61.50 | -0.32 | -0.52% |
| American Funds EUPAC A | |||
FNDF and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, FNDF has been closely correlated with STM. These tickers have moved in lockstep 75% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if FNDF jumps, then STM could also see price increases.
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To FNDF | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| FNDF | 100% | -0.07% | ||
| STM - FNDF | 75% Closely correlated | -1.55% | ||
| BNT - FNDF | 74% Closely correlated | +0.86% | ||
| BN - FNDF | 72% Closely correlated | +0.22% | ||
| BAM - FNDF | 72% Closely correlated | -0.27% | ||
| BNS - FNDF | 68% Closely correlated | -0.16% | ||
More | ||||
ICOW and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, ICOW has been closely correlated with BHP. These tickers have moved in lockstep 76% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if ICOW jumps, then BHP could also see price increases.
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To ICOW | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| ICOW | 100% | -0.28% | ||
| BHP - ICOW | 76% Closely correlated | -1.72% | ||
| RIO - ICOW | 72% Closely correlated | -1.14% | ||
| SHEL - ICOW | 70% Closely correlated | -0.54% | ||
| WDS - ICOW | 67% Closely correlated | +2.08% | ||
| TTE - ICOW | 66% Loosely correlated | +0.38% | ||
More | ||||