Ad is loading...
FNDF vs ICOW
FNDF vs ICOW Comparison
Open Charts FNDF vs ICOW
Schwab Fundamental International Eq ETF
Price$36.91
Change+$0.44 (+1.21%)
Volume$833.1K
Net Assets14.77B
Pacer Dev Mkts Intl Csh Cows 100 ETF
Price$31.58
Change+$0.20 (+0.64%)
Volume$113.26K
Net Assets1.03B
FNDF vs ICOW Comparison Chart
Loading...
Show more...
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FNDF vs. ICOW commentary
Apr 25, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FNDF is a Buy and ICOW is a StrongBuy.
SUMMARIES
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FNDF has more net assets: 14.8B vs. ICOW (1.03B). FNDF has a higher annual dividend yield than ICOW: FNDF (11.141) vs ICOW (9.041). FNDF was incepted earlier than ICOW: FNDF (12 years) vs ICOW (8 years). FNDF (0.25) has a lower expense ratio than ICOW (0.65). ICOW has a higher turnover FNDF (11.00) vs FNDF (11.00).
| FNDF | ICOW | FNDF / ICOW | |
| Gain YTD | 11.141 | 9.041 | 123% |
| Net Assets | 14.8B | 1.03B | 1,431% |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.25 | 0.65 | 38% |
| Turnover | 11.00 | 67.00 | 16% |
| Yield | 3.70 | 4.70 | 79% |
| Fund Existence | 12 years | 8 years | - |
TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
| FNDF | ICOW | |
|---|---|---|
| RSI ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 90% | 1 day ago 90% |
| Stochastic ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 78% | 1 day ago 73% |
| Momentum ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 84% | 1 day ago 85% |
| MACD ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 90% | 1 day ago 85% |
| TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 81% | 1 day ago 82% |
| TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 74% | 1 day ago 72% |
| Advances ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 81% | 1 day ago 81% |
| Declines ODDS (%) | 18 days ago 78% | 18 days ago 73% |
| BollingerBands ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 90% | 1 day ago 90% |
| Aroon ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 80% | 1 day ago 75% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Ad is loading...
Show more...
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
FNDF and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, FNDF has been closely correlated with STM. These tickers have moved in lockstep 75% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if FNDF jumps, then STM could also see price increases.
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To FNDF | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| FNDF | 100% | +1.21% | ||
| STM - FNDF | 75% Closely correlated | +7.16% | ||
| BNT - FNDF | 74% Closely correlated | +3.80% | ||
| BN - FNDF | 72% Closely correlated | +3.76% | ||
| BAM - FNDF | 72% Closely correlated | +3.64% | ||
| BNS - FNDF | 68% Closely correlated | +0.19% | ||
More | ||||
ICOW and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, ICOW has been closely correlated with BHP. These tickers have moved in lockstep 76% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if ICOW jumps, then BHP could also see price increases.
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To ICOW | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| ICOW | 100% | +0.64% | ||
| BHP - ICOW | 76% Closely correlated | +1.92% | ||
| RIO - ICOW | 72% Closely correlated | +2.48% | ||
| WDS - ICOW | 72% Closely correlated | +0.55% | ||
| SHEL - ICOW | 71% Closely correlated | +0.84% | ||
| TTE - ICOW | 66% Loosely correlated | +0.99% | ||
More | ||||