Ad is loading...
FNDF vs ICOW
FNDF vs ICOW Comparison
Open Charts FNDF vs ICOW
Schwab Fundamental International Eq ETF
Price$34.70
Change-$0.16 (-0.46%)
Volume$860
Net Assets13.79B
Pacer Dev Mkts Intl Csh Cows 100 ETF
Price$30.09
Change-$0.25 (-0.82%)
Volume$1.14K
Net Assets1.08B
FNDF vs ICOW Comparison Chart
Loading...
Show more...
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FNDF vs. ICOW commentary
Jan 31, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FNDF is a Buy and ICOW is a Hold.
SUMMARIES
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FNDF has more net assets: 13.8B vs. ICOW (1.08B). FNDF has a higher annual dividend yield than ICOW: FNDF (4.938) vs ICOW (3.955). FNDF was incepted earlier than ICOW: FNDF (11 years) vs ICOW (8 years). ICOW has a higher turnover FNDF (15.00) vs FNDF (15.00).
| FNDF | ICOW | FNDF / ICOW | |
| Gain YTD | 4.938 | 3.955 | 125% |
| Net Assets | 13.8B | 1.08B | 1,273% |
| Total Expense Ratio | N/A | N/A | - |
| Turnover | 15.00 | 59.00 | 25% |
| Yield | 3.24 | 3.64 | 89% |
| Fund Existence | 11 years | 8 years | - |
TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
| FNDF | ICOW | |
|---|---|---|
| RSI ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 76% | N/A |
| Stochastic ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 76% | 3 days ago 89% |
| Momentum ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 80% | 3 days ago 82% |
| MACD ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 73% | 3 days ago 77% |
| TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 80% | 3 days ago 81% |
| TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 77% | 3 days ago 79% |
| Advances ODDS (%) | 8 days ago 81% | 26 days ago 80% |
| Declines ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 80% | 3 days ago 74% |
| BollingerBands ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 76% | 3 days ago 79% |
| Aroon ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 73% | 3 days ago 78% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Ad is loading...
Show more...
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
FNDF and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, FNDF has been closely correlated with STM. These tickers have moved in lockstep 75% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if FNDF jumps, then STM could also see price increases.
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To FNDF | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| FNDF | 100% | +1.19% | ||
| STM - FNDF | 75% Closely correlated | -8.97% | ||
| BNT - FNDF | 74% Closely correlated | +2.35% | ||
| BN - FNDF | 72% Closely correlated | +2.63% | ||
| BAM - FNDF | 72% Closely correlated | -0.93% | ||
| BNS - FNDF | 68% Closely correlated | -0.13% | ||
More | ||||
ICOW and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, ICOW has been closely correlated with BHP. These tickers have moved in lockstep 76% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if ICOW jumps, then BHP could also see price increases.
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To ICOW | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| ICOW | 100% | +1.25% | ||
| BHP - ICOW | 76% Closely correlated | +1.97% | ||
| RIO - ICOW | 72% Closely correlated | +1.99% | ||
| TTE - ICOW | 66% Loosely correlated | +0.95% | ||
| CNQ - ICOW | 64% Loosely correlated | +0.81% | ||
| WDS - ICOW | 63% Loosely correlated | +0.71% | ||
More | ||||