Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FNDF vs ICOW
FNDF vs ICOW Comparison
Open Charts FNDF vs ICOW
Schwab Fundamental International Eq ETF
Price$38.55
Change-$0.07 (-0.18%)
Volume$200
Net Assets15.77B
Pacer Dev Mkts Intl Csh Cows 100 ETF
Price$33.05
Change-$0.02 (-0.06%)
Volume$167
Net Assets1.1B
FNDF vs ICOW Comparison Chart
Loading...
Show more...
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FNDF vs. ICOW commentary
May 22, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FNDF is a Buy and ICOW is a Buy.
SUMMARIES
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FNDF has more net assets: 15.8B vs. ICOW (1.1B). FNDF has a higher annual dividend yield than ICOW: FNDF (16.260) vs ICOW (14.185). FNDF was incepted earlier than ICOW: FNDF (12 years) vs ICOW (8 years). FNDF (0.25) has a lower expense ratio than ICOW (0.65). ICOW has a higher turnover FNDF (12.00) vs FNDF (12.00).
| FNDF | ICOW | FNDF / ICOW | |
| Gain YTD | 16.260 | 14.185 | 115% |
| Net Assets | 15.8B | 1.1B | 1,442% |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.25 | 0.65 | 38% |
| Turnover | 12.00 | 67.00 | 18% |
| Yield | 3.57 | 4.64 | 77% |
| Fund Existence | 12 years | 8 years | - |
TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
| FNDF | ICOW | |
|---|---|---|
| RSI ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 78% | 2 days ago 77% |
| Stochastic ODDS (%) | 7 days ago 75% | 2 days ago 89% |
| Momentum ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 79% | 2 days ago 83% |
| MACD ODDS (%) | 4 days ago 76% | 3 days ago 78% |
| TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 80% | 2 days ago 81% |
| TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 77% | 2 days ago 78% |
| Advances ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 81% | 3 days ago 81% |
| Declines ODDS (%) | 15 days ago 79% | 15 days ago 74% |
| BollingerBands ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 76% | 2 days ago 82% |
| Aroon ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 73% | 2 days ago 79% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Show more...
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
FNDF and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, FNDF has been closely correlated with STM. These tickers have moved in lockstep 75% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if FNDF jumps, then STM could also see price increases.
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To FNDF | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| FNDF | 100% | -0.46% | ||
| STM - FNDF | 75% Closely correlated | -2.40% | ||
| BNT - FNDF | 74% Closely correlated | -2.94% | ||
| BN - FNDF | 72% Closely correlated | -3.44% | ||
| BAM - FNDF | 72% Closely correlated | -2.58% | ||
| BNS - FNDF | 68% Closely correlated | -0.21% | ||
More | ||||
ICOW and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, ICOW has been closely correlated with BHP. These tickers have moved in lockstep 76% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if ICOW jumps, then BHP could also see price increases.
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To ICOW | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| ICOW | 100% | -0.54% | ||
| BHP - ICOW | 76% Closely correlated | -0.76% | ||
| RIO - ICOW | 72% Closely correlated | -0.42% | ||
| WDS - ICOW | 71% Closely correlated | -0.93% | ||
| SHEL - ICOW | 70% Closely correlated | -0.39% | ||
| TTE - ICOW | 66% Loosely correlated | -0.96% | ||
More | ||||