Ad is loading...
FNDF vs ICOW
FNDF vs ICOW Comparison
Open Charts FNDF vs ICOW
Schwab Fundamental International Eq ETF
Price$33.38
Change-$2.11 (-5.95%)
Volume$1.5K
Net Assets14.37B
Pacer Dev Mkts Intl Csh Cows 100 ETF
Price$28.95
Change-$1.84 (-5.98%)
Volume$392
Net Assets1.1B
FNDF vs ICOW Comparison Chart
Loading...
Show more...
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FNDF vs. ICOW commentary
Apr 04, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FNDF is a Hold and ICOW is a Hold.
SUMMARIES
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FNDF has more net assets: 14.4B vs. ICOW (1.1B). FNDF has a higher annual dividend yield than ICOW: FNDF (6.865) vs ICOW (6.313). FNDF was incepted earlier than ICOW: FNDF (12 years) vs ICOW (8 years). FNDF (0.25) has a lower expense ratio than ICOW (0.65). ICOW has a higher turnover FNDF (11.00) vs FNDF (11.00).
| FNDF | ICOW | FNDF / ICOW | |
| Gain YTD | 6.865 | 6.313 | 109% |
| Net Assets | 14.4B | 1.1B | 1,306% |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.25 | 0.65 | 38% |
| Turnover | 11.00 | 67.00 | 16% |
| Yield | 3.70 | 4.70 | 79% |
| Fund Existence | 12 years | 8 years | - |
TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
| FNDF | ICOW | |
|---|---|---|
| RSI ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 72% | 2 days ago 83% |
| Stochastic ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 81% | 2 days ago 78% |
| Momentum ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 79% | 2 days ago 78% |
| MACD ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 75% | 2 days ago 68% |
| TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 76% | 2 days ago 75% |
| TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 74% | 2 days ago 79% |
| Advances ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 82% | 17 days ago 82% |
| Declines ODDS (%) | 5 days ago 79% | 2 days ago 73% |
| BollingerBands ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 83% | 2 days ago 86% |
| Aroon ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 79% | 2 days ago 85% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Ad is loading...
Show more...
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
FNDF and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, FNDF has been closely correlated with STM. These tickers have moved in lockstep 75% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if FNDF jumps, then STM could also see price increases.
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To FNDF | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| FNDF | 100% | -2.15% | ||
| STM - FNDF | 75% Closely correlated | -10.86% | ||
| BNT - FNDF | 74% Closely correlated | -7.03% | ||
| BN - FNDF | 72% Closely correlated | -7.41% | ||
| BAM - FNDF | 72% Closely correlated | -7.38% | ||
| BNS - FNDF | 68% Closely correlated | +1.79% | ||
More | ||||
ICOW and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, ICOW has been closely correlated with BHP. These tickers have moved in lockstep 76% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if ICOW jumps, then BHP could also see price increases.
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To ICOW | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| ICOW | 100% | -2.50% | ||
| BHP - ICOW | 76% Closely correlated | -2.92% | ||
| RIO - ICOW | 72% Closely correlated | -2.45% | ||
| TTE - ICOW | 66% Loosely correlated | -3.59% | ||
| CNQ - ICOW | 64% Loosely correlated | -5.03% | ||
| MT - ICOW | 62% Loosely correlated | -7.29% | ||
More | ||||