Ad is loading...
FNDF vs ICOW
FNDF vs ICOW Comparison
Open Charts FNDF vs ICOW
Schwab Fundamental International Eq ETF
Price$32.91
Change-$0.84 (-2.49%)
Volume$3.76K
CapitalizationN/A
Pacer Dev Mkts Intl Csh Cows 100 ETF
Price$28.91
Change-$0.63 (-2.13%)
Volume$300
CapitalizationN/A
FNDF vs ICOW Comparison Chart
Loading...
Show more...
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FNDF vs. ICOW commentary
Dec 19, 2024
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FNDF is a Hold and ICOW is a Hold.
SUMMARIES
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FNDF has more net assets: 13.3B vs. ICOW (1.17B). FNDF has a higher annual dividend yield than ICOW: FNDF (3.957) vs ICOW (-1.758). FNDF was incepted earlier than ICOW: FNDF (11 years) vs ICOW (8 years). ICOW has a higher turnover FNDF (15.00) vs FNDF (15.00).
| FNDF | ICOW | FNDF / ICOW | |
| Gain YTD | 3.957 | -1.758 | -225% |
| Net Assets | 13.3B | 1.17B | 1,139% |
| Total Expense Ratio | N/A | N/A | - |
| Turnover | 15.00 | 59.00 | 25% |
| Yield | 3.24 | 3.64 | 89% |
| Fund Existence | 11 years | 8 years | - |
TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
| FNDF | ICOW | |
|---|---|---|
| RSI ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 77% | N/A |
| Stochastic ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 78% | 2 days ago 87% |
| Momentum ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 83% | 2 days ago 80% |
| MACD ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 73% | 2 days ago 73% |
| TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 78% | 2 days ago 77% |
| TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 77% | 2 days ago 75% |
| Advances ODDS (%) | 20 days ago 80% | 20 days ago 80% |
| Declines ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 81% | 2 days ago 76% |
| BollingerBands ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 78% | 2 days ago 83% |
| Aroon ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 79% | 2 days ago 88% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Ad is loading...
Show more...
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
FNDF and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, FNDF has been closely correlated with STM. These tickers have moved in lockstep 75% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if FNDF jumps, then STM could also see price increases.
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To FNDF | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| FNDF | 100% | -0.50% | ||
| STM - FNDF | 75% Closely correlated | +0.82% | ||
| BNT - FNDF | 74% Closely correlated | -0.42% | ||
| BN - FNDF | 72% Closely correlated | -0.24% | ||
| BAM - FNDF | 72% Closely correlated | -1.50% | ||
| BNS - FNDF | 68% Closely correlated | -0.36% | ||
More | ||||
ICOW and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, ICOW has been closely correlated with BHP. These tickers have moved in lockstep 76% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if ICOW jumps, then BHP could also see price increases.
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To ICOW | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| ICOW | 100% | -0.84% | ||
| BHP - ICOW | 76% Closely correlated | -0.22% | ||
| RIO - ICOW | 72% Closely correlated | +0.33% | ||
| TTE - ICOW | 66% Loosely correlated | +0.13% | ||
| CNQ - ICOW | 64% Loosely correlated | -0.78% | ||
| WDS - ICOW | 63% Loosely correlated | -0.33% | ||
More | ||||