Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FNDF vs PID
FNDF vs PID Comparison
Open Charts FNDF vs PID
Schwab Fundamental International Eq ETF
Price$40.36
Change-$0.33 (-0.81%)
Volume$1.81M
Net Assets16.65B
Invesco International Div Achiev ETF
Price$20.63
Change-$0.14 (-0.67%)
Volume$52.26K
Net Assets853.45M
FNDF vs PID Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
Show more...
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FNDF vs. PID commentary
Jul 31, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FNDF is a Hold and PID is a Hold.
SUMMARIES
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FNDF has more net assets: 16.7B vs. PID (853M). FNDF has a higher annual dividend yield than PID: FNDF (22.188) vs PID (15.115). FNDF was incepted earlier than PID: FNDF (12 years) vs PID (20 years). FNDF (0.25) has a lower expense ratio than PID (0.53). PID has a higher turnover FNDF (12.00) vs FNDF (12.00).
| FNDF | PID | FNDF / PID | |
| Gain YTD | 22.188 | 15.115 | 147% |
| Net Assets | 16.7B | 853M | 1,958% |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.25 | 0.53 | 47% |
| Turnover | 12.00 | 42.00 | 29% |
| Yield | 3.07 | 3.59 | 86% |
| Fund Existence | 12 years | 20 years | - |
TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
| FNDF | PID | |
|---|---|---|
| RSI ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 79% | 1 day ago 87% |
| Stochastic ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 76% | 1 day ago 74% |
| Momentum ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 86% | 1 day ago 81% |
| MACD ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 73% | 1 day ago 80% |
| TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 77% | 1 day ago 77% |
| TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 77% | 1 day ago 78% |
| Advances ODDS (%) | 9 days ago 82% | 9 days ago 83% |
| Declines ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 79% | 1 day ago 78% |
| BollingerBands ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 66% | 1 day ago 71% |
| Aroon ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 75% | 1 day ago 75% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Show more...
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
| 1 Day | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| ETFs / NAME | Price $ | Chg $ | Chg % |
| QMAR | 31.45 | N/A | +0.02% |
| FT Vest Nasdaq-100 Buffer ETF – Mar | |||
| IBDT | 25.34 | -0.02 | -0.08% |
| iShares iBonds Dec 2028 Term Corp ETF | |||
| CPSL | 26.49 | -0.04 | -0.14% |
| Calamos Laddered S&P 500 Str Alt Prt ETF | |||
| MCH | 26.14 | -0.29 | -1.10% |
| Matthews China Active ETF | |||
| FTXN | 28.22 | -0.41 | -1.43% |
| First Trust Nasdaq Oil & Gas ETF | |||
FNDF and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, FNDF has been closely correlated with STM. These tickers have moved in lockstep 75% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if FNDF jumps, then STM could also see price increases.
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To FNDF | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| FNDF | 100% | -0.81% | ||
| STM - FNDF | 75% Closely correlated | -1.92% | ||
| BNT - FNDF | 74% Closely correlated | -0.46% | ||
| BN - FNDF | 72% Closely correlated | -0.47% | ||
| BAM - FNDF | 72% Closely correlated | -0.99% | ||
| BNS - FNDF | 68% Closely correlated | +0.09% | ||
More | ||||