Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FNDF vs RODM
FNDF vs RODM Comparison
Open Charts FNDF vs RODM
Schwab Fundamental International Eq ETF
Price$39.57
Change-$0.38 (-0.95%)
Volume$1.28M
Net Assets16.11B
Hartford Multifactor Dev Mkts (exUS) ETF
Price$33.99
Change-$0.23 (-0.67%)
Volume$49.45K
Net Assets1.15B
FNDF vs RODM Comparison Chart
Loading...
Show more...
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FNDF vs. RODM commentary
Jun 15, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FNDF is a Hold and RODM is a Hold.
SUMMARIES
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FNDF has more net assets: 16.1B vs. RODM (1.15B). RODM (19.599) and FNDF (19.151) have matching annual dividend yield . FNDF was incepted earlier than RODM: FNDF (12 years) vs RODM (10 years). FNDF (0.25) has a lower expense ratio than RODM (0.29). RODM has a higher turnover FNDF (12.00) vs FNDF (12.00).
| FNDF | RODM | FNDF / RODM | |
| Gain YTD | 19.151 | 19.599 | 98% |
| Net Assets | 16.1B | 1.15B | 1,398% |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.25 | 0.29 | 86% |
| Turnover | 12.00 | 61.00 | 20% |
| Yield | 3.41 | 3.44 | 99% |
| Fund Existence | 12 years | 10 years | - |
TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
| FNDF | RODM | |
|---|---|---|
| RSI ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 80% | 2 days ago 53% |
| Stochastic ODDS (%) | N/A | 2 days ago 64% |
| Momentum ODDS (%) | N/A | N/A |
| MACD ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 83% | 2 days ago 74% |
| TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 81% | 2 days ago 75% |
| TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 77% | 2 days ago 76% |
| Advances ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 82% | 6 days ago 83% |
| Declines ODDS (%) | 24 days ago 80% | 4 days ago 79% |
| BollingerBands ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 85% | 2 days ago 74% |
| Aroon ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 73% | 2 days ago 77% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Show more...
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
FNDF and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, FNDF has been closely correlated with STM. These tickers have moved in lockstep 75% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if FNDF jumps, then STM could also see price increases.
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To FNDF | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| FNDF | 100% | -0.95% | ||
| STM - FNDF | 75% Closely correlated | -2.44% | ||
| BNT - FNDF | 74% Closely correlated | -2.59% | ||
| BN - FNDF | 72% Closely correlated | -2.30% | ||
| BAM - FNDF | 72% Closely correlated | -2.74% | ||
| BNS - FNDF | 68% Closely correlated | N/A | ||
More | ||||
RODM and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, RODM has been closely correlated with BN. These tickers have moved in lockstep 72% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if RODM jumps, then BN could also see price increases.
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To RODM | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| RODM | 100% | -0.67% | ||
| BN - RODM | 72% Closely correlated | -2.30% | ||
| TD - RODM | 72% Closely correlated | +0.03% | ||
| BNS - RODM | 69% Closely correlated | N/A | ||
| RY - RODM | 68% Closely correlated | -0.83% | ||
| SAN - RODM | 68% Closely correlated | -1.73% | ||
More | ||||