Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FNDF vs RODM
FNDF vs RODM Comparison
Open Charts FNDF vs RODM
Schwab Fundamental International Eq ETF
Price$41.30
Change-$0.03 (-0.07%)
Volume$870.3K
Net Assets16.88B
Hartford Multifactor Dev Mkts (exUS) ETF
Price$34.55
Change-$0.10 (-0.29%)
Volume$42.37K
Net Assets1.18B
FNDF vs RODM Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
Show more...
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FNDF vs. RODM commentary
Jul 27, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FNDF is a Hold and RODM is a StrongBuy.
SUMMARIES
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FNDF has more net assets: 16.9B vs. RODM (1.18B). FNDF (25.034) and RODM (23.855) have matching annual dividend yield . FNDF was incepted earlier than RODM: FNDF (12 years) vs RODM (10 years). FNDF (0.25) has a lower expense ratio than RODM (0.29). RODM has a higher turnover FNDF (12.00) vs FNDF (12.00).
| FNDF | RODM | FNDF / RODM | |
| Gain YTD | 25.034 | 23.855 | 105% |
| Net Assets | 16.9B | 1.18B | 1,430% |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.25 | 0.29 | 86% |
| Turnover | 12.00 | 61.00 | 20% |
| Yield | 3.07 | 3.57 | 86% |
| Fund Existence | 12 years | 10 years | - |
TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
| FNDF | RODM | |
|---|---|---|
| RSI ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 77% | 2 days ago 58% |
| Stochastic ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 69% | 2 days ago 66% |
| Momentum ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 84% | 2 days ago 81% |
| MACD ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 90% | 2 days ago 83% |
| TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 81% | 2 days ago 79% |
| TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 77% | 2 days ago 77% |
| Advances ODDS (%) | 4 days ago 82% | 4 days ago 83% |
| Declines ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 79% | 2 days ago 78% |
| BollingerBands ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 69% | 2 days ago 77% |
| Aroon ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 75% | 2 days ago 79% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Show more...
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
FNDF and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, FNDF has been closely correlated with STM. These tickers have moved in lockstep 75% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if FNDF jumps, then STM could also see price increases.
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To FNDF | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| FNDF | 100% | -0.07% | ||
| STM - FNDF | 75% Closely correlated | -1.55% | ||
| BNT - FNDF | 74% Closely correlated | +0.86% | ||
| BN - FNDF | 72% Closely correlated | +0.22% | ||
| BAM - FNDF | 72% Closely correlated | -0.27% | ||
| BNS - FNDF | 68% Closely correlated | -0.16% | ||
More | ||||
RODM and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, RODM has been closely correlated with BN. These tickers have moved in lockstep 72% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if RODM jumps, then BN could also see price increases.
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To RODM | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| RODM | 100% | -0.31% | ||
| BN - RODM | 72% Closely correlated | +0.22% | ||
| TD - RODM | 72% Closely correlated | +0.09% | ||
| BNS - RODM | 69% Closely correlated | -0.16% | ||
| RY - RODM | 68% Closely correlated | +0.02% | ||
| SAN - RODM | 67% Closely correlated | +1.01% | ||
More | ||||