Ad is loading...
FNDF vs RODM
FNDF vs RODM Comparison
Open Charts FNDF vs RODM
Schwab Fundamental International Eq ETF
Price$36.91
Change+$0.44 (+1.21%)
Volume$833.1K
Net Assets14.77B
Hartford Multifactor Dev Mkts (exUS) ETF
Price$31.83
Change+$0.26 (+0.82%)
Volume$91.68K
Net Assets1.07B
FNDF vs RODM Comparison Chart
Loading...
Show more...
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FNDF vs. RODM commentary
Apr 25, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FNDF is a Buy and RODM is a Hold.
SUMMARIES
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FNDF has more net assets: 14.8B vs. RODM (1.07B). RODM has a higher annual dividend yield than FNDF: RODM (11.999) vs FNDF (11.141). FNDF was incepted earlier than RODM: FNDF (12 years) vs RODM (10 years). FNDF (0.25) has a lower expense ratio than RODM (0.29). RODM has a higher turnover FNDF (11.00) vs FNDF (11.00).
| FNDF | RODM | FNDF / RODM | |
| Gain YTD | 11.141 | 11.999 | 93% |
| Net Assets | 14.8B | 1.07B | 1,378% |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.25 | 0.29 | 86% |
| Turnover | 11.00 | 61.00 | 18% |
| Yield | 3.70 | 3.76 | 99% |
| Fund Existence | 12 years | 10 years | - |
TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
| FNDF | RODM | |
|---|---|---|
| RSI ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 90% | 1 day ago 90% |
| Stochastic ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 78% | 1 day ago 71% |
| Momentum ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 84% | 1 day ago 82% |
| MACD ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 90% | 1 day ago 83% |
| TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 81% | 1 day ago 78% |
| TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 74% | 1 day ago 76% |
| Advances ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 81% | 11 days ago 83% |
| Declines ODDS (%) | 18 days ago 78% | 18 days ago 78% |
| BollingerBands ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 90% | 1 day ago 90% |
| Aroon ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 80% | 1 day ago 65% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Ad is loading...
Show more...
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
FNDF and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, FNDF has been closely correlated with STM. These tickers have moved in lockstep 75% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if FNDF jumps, then STM could also see price increases.
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To FNDF | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| FNDF | 100% | +1.21% | ||
| STM - FNDF | 75% Closely correlated | +7.16% | ||
| BNT - FNDF | 74% Closely correlated | +3.80% | ||
| BN - FNDF | 72% Closely correlated | +3.76% | ||
| BAM - FNDF | 72% Closely correlated | +3.64% | ||
| BNS - FNDF | 68% Closely correlated | +0.19% | ||
More | ||||
RODM and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, RODM has been closely correlated with BN. These tickers have moved in lockstep 72% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if RODM jumps, then BN could also see price increases.
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To RODM | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| RODM | 100% | +0.82% | ||
| BN - RODM | 72% Closely correlated | +3.76% | ||
| TD - RODM | 72% Closely correlated | +0.66% | ||
| SAN - RODM | 69% Closely correlated | +0.14% | ||
| BNS - RODM | 69% Closely correlated | +0.19% | ||
| RY - RODM | 68% Closely correlated | -0.10% | ||
More | ||||