FNEDF
Price
$28.00
Change
-$0.00 (-0.00%)
Updated
Mar 25 closing price
UCAR
Price
$7.00
Change
+$0.57 (+8.86%)
Updated
Nov 14 closing price
Ad is loading...

FNEDF vs UCAR

Header iconFNEDF vs UCAR Comparison
Open Charts FNEDF vs UCARBanner chart's image
FASTNED B V
Price$28.00
Change-$0.00 (-0.00%)
Volume$100
CapitalizationN/A
U Power
Price$7.00
Change+$0.57 (+8.86%)
Volume$94.6K
CapitalizationN/A
FNEDF vs UCAR Comparison Chart
Loading...
UCAR
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if shorted
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
FNEDF vs. UCAR commentary
Nov 15, 2024

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FNEDF is a Hold and UCAR is a Buy.

COMPARISON
Comparison
Nov 15, 2024
Stock price -- (FNEDF: $28.00 vs. UCAR: $7.00)
Brand notoriety: FNEDF and UCAR are both not notable
Both companies represent the Specialty Stores industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: FNEDF: 100% vs. UCAR: 507%
Market capitalization -- FNEDF: $635.38M vs. UCAR: $3.89M
FNEDF [@Specialty Stores] is valued at $635.38M. UCAR’s [@Specialty Stores] market capitalization is $3.89M. The market cap for tickers in the [@Specialty Stores] industry ranges from $380.15B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Specialty Stores] industry is $8.67B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

FNEDF’s FA Score shows that 0 FA rating(s) are green whileUCAR’s FA Score has 0 green FA rating(s).

  • FNEDF’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
  • UCAR’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
According to our system of comparison, UCAR is a better buy in the long-term than FNEDF.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

UCAR’s TA Score shows that 4 TA indicator(s) are bullish.

  • UCAR’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 5 bearish.

Price Growth

FNEDF (@Specialty Stores) experienced а 0.00% price change this week, while UCAR (@Specialty Stores) price change was -12.39% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Specialty Stores industry was -2.09%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was -0.74%, and the average quarterly price growth was +0.17%.

Industries' Descriptions

@Specialty Stores (-2.09% weekly)

The specialty stores sector includes companies dedicated to the sale of retail products focused on a single product category, such as clothing, carpet, books, or office supplies. A specialty store could face intense competition from big-box departmental chains, and therefore offering an adequate collection of the product type it specializes in is key in maintaining/growing its market.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FNEDF($635M) has a higher market cap than UCAR($3.89M). FNEDF YTD gains are higher at: -7.621 vs. UCAR (-61.853).
FNEDFUCARFNEDF / UCAR
Capitalization635M3.89M16,307%
EBITDAN/AN/A-
Gain YTD-7.621-61.85312%
P/E RatioN/AN/A-
RevenueN/AN/A-
Total CashN/AN/A-
Total DebtN/AN/A-
TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
UCAR
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
90%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
82%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
90%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
90%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
90%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
82%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 10 days ago
75%
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
90%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
53%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
90%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Ad is loading...
UCAR
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if shorted
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
MFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
TSCIX14.35N/A
N/A
AMG TimesSquare Small Cap Growth Z
LOAGX14.15N/A
N/A
Lord Abbett International Growth F3
MFWIX17.70-0.02
-0.11%
MFS Global Total Return I
PGTIX20.99-0.04
-0.19%
T. Rowe Price Global Technology I
FSKGX19.56-0.27
-1.36%
Fidelity Growth Strategies K6

FNEDF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that FNEDF and PTVLF have been poorly correlated (+15% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that FNEDF and PTVLF's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To FNEDF
1D Price
Change %
FNEDF100%
N/A
PTVLF - FNEDF
15%
Poorly correlated
N/A
SVV - FNEDF
2%
Poorly correlated
-3.07%
UCAR - FNEDF
1%
Poorly correlated
+8.86%
EICCF - FNEDF
0%
Poorly correlated
N/A
SPEV - FNEDF
-0%
Poorly correlated
-13.25%
More

UCAR and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, UCAR has been closely correlated with JZXN. These tickers have moved in lockstep 79% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if UCAR jumps, then JZXN could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To UCAR
1D Price
Change %
UCAR100%
+8.86%
JZXN - UCAR
79%
Closely correlated
-5.07%
EVGO - UCAR
23%
Poorly correlated
-2.88%
GRWG - UCAR
21%
Poorly correlated
-4.81%
BQ - UCAR
20%
Poorly correlated
-3.60%
MNSO - UCAR
20%
Poorly correlated
-6.35%
More