FNEVY
Price
$4.26
Change
-$0.04 (-0.93%)
Updated
Jul 31 closing price
Capitalization
1.19B
FPAFF
Price
$0.54
Change
+$0.04 (+8.00%)
Updated
Jan 16 closing price
Capitalization
1.53B
Ad is loading...

FNEVY vs FPAFF

Header iconFNEVY vs FPAFF Comparison
Open Charts FNEVY vs FPAFFBanner chart's image
Fraser & Neave
Price$4.26
Change-$0.04 (-0.93%)
Volume$101
Capitalization1.19B
First Pacific
Price$0.54
Change+$0.04 (+8.00%)
Volume$7.1K
Capitalization1.53B
FNEVY vs FPAFF Comparison Chart
Loading...
FPAFF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
FNEVY vs. FPAFF commentary
Jan 19, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FNEVY is a Hold and FPAFF is a Hold.

Ad is loading...
COMPARISON
Comparison
Jan 19, 2025
Stock price -- (FNEVY: $4.26 vs. FPAFF: $0.54)
Brand notoriety: FNEVY and FPAFF are both not notable
Both companies represent the Food: Specialty/Candy industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: FNEVY: 100% vs. FPAFF: 81%
Market capitalization -- FNEVY: $1.19B vs. FPAFF: $1.53B
FNEVY [@Food: Specialty/Candy] is valued at $1.19B. FPAFF’s [@Food: Specialty/Candy] market capitalization is $1.53B. The market cap for tickers in the [@Food: Specialty/Candy] industry ranges from $327.81B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Food: Specialty/Candy] industry is $9.18B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

FNEVY’s FA Score shows that 1 FA rating(s) are green whileFPAFF’s FA Score has 2 green FA rating(s).

  • FNEVY’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
  • FPAFF’s FA Score: 2 green, 3 red.
According to our system of comparison, FPAFF is a better buy in the long-term than FNEVY.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

FPAFF’s TA Score shows that 5 TA indicator(s) are bullish.

  • FPAFF’s TA Score: 5 bullish, 3 bearish.

Price Growth

FNEVY (@Food: Specialty/Candy) experienced а 0.00% price change this week, while FPAFF (@Food: Specialty/Candy) price change was +5.85% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Food: Specialty/Candy industry was +0.73%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was -1.03%, and the average quarterly price growth was +21.73%.

Industries' Descriptions

@Food: Specialty/Candy (+0.73% weekly)

A specialty/candy manufacturer specializes in one or more of the following: chocolate, candies, pasta, condiments, seasonings, among other items. Hershey Company, McCormick & Company and J.M. Smucker Company are some of the major firms in this segment. Demand for this industry’s products comes from both institutions/restaurants as well as households.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FPAFF($1.53B) has a higher market cap than FNEVY($1.19B). FNEVY has higher P/E ratio than FPAFF: FNEVY (11.56) vs FPAFF (3.90). FNEVY YTD gains are higher at: 0.000 vs. FPAFF (-3.646). FPAFF has higher annual earnings (EBITDA): 2.25B vs. FNEVY (331M). FPAFF has more cash in the bank: 2.81B vs. FNEVY (348M). FNEVY has less debt than FPAFF: FNEVY (1.16B) vs FPAFF (11.2B). FPAFF has higher revenues than FNEVY: FPAFF (9.95B) vs FNEVY (2.04B).
FNEVYFPAFFFNEVY / FPAFF
Capitalization1.19B1.53B78%
EBITDA331M2.25B15%
Gain YTD0.000-3.646-
P/E Ratio11.563.90296%
Revenue2.04B9.95B20%
Total Cash348M2.81B12%
Total Debt1.16B11.2B10%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
FNEVY vs FPAFF: Fundamental Ratings
FNEVY
FPAFF
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
5050
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
15
Undervalued
9
Undervalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
10038
SMR RATING
1..100
9098
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
5549
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
5326
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
4550

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

FPAFF's Valuation (9) in the null industry is in the same range as FNEVY (15). This means that FPAFF’s stock grew similarly to FNEVY’s over the last 12 months.

FPAFF's Profit vs Risk Rating (38) in the null industry is somewhat better than the same rating for FNEVY (100). This means that FPAFF’s stock grew somewhat faster than FNEVY’s over the last 12 months.

FNEVY's SMR Rating (90) in the null industry is in the same range as FPAFF (98). This means that FNEVY’s stock grew similarly to FPAFF’s over the last 12 months.

FPAFF's Price Growth Rating (49) in the null industry is in the same range as FNEVY (55). This means that FPAFF’s stock grew similarly to FNEVY’s over the last 12 months.

FPAFF's P/E Growth Rating (26) in the null industry is in the same range as FNEVY (53). This means that FPAFF’s stock grew similarly to FNEVY’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
FNEVYFPAFF
RSI
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bullish Trend 11 days ago
86%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bearish Trend 11 days ago
74%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bullish Trend 11 days ago
80%
MACD
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bullish Trend 11 days ago
68%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 11 days ago
20%
Bullish Trend 11 days ago
70%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 11 days ago
21%
Bearish Trend 11 days ago
52%
Advances
ODDS (%)
N/A
N/A
Declines
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bearish Trend about 1 month ago
52%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bullish Trend 11 days ago
66%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
N/A
N/A
View a ticker or compare two or three
Ad is loading...
FPAFF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
MFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
MACCX16.320.17
+1.05%
MoA Catholic Values Index Fund Class
DFRSX17.010.15
+0.89%
DFA Asia Pacific Small Company I
TIDDX62.630.45
+0.72%
T. Rowe Price International Discovery I
JEMGX9.460.06
+0.64%
JHancock Emerging Markets Equity R6
FGIAX11.700.05
+0.43%
Nuveen Global Infrastructure A

FNEVY and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, FNEVY has been loosely correlated with TATYF. These tickers have moved in lockstep 36% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if FNEVY jumps, then TATYF could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To FNEVY
1D Price
Change %
FNEVY100%
N/A
TATYF - FNEVY
36%
Loosely correlated
N/A
ORKLF - FNEVY
24%
Poorly correlated
N/A
SUEZY - FNEVY
24%
Poorly correlated
N/A
CLBEY - FNEVY
6%
Poorly correlated
-0.96%
FPAFF - FNEVY
4%
Poorly correlated
N/A
More

FPAFF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that FPAFF and BRRLY have been poorly correlated (+20% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that FPAFF and BRRLY's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To FPAFF
1D Price
Change %
FPAFF100%
N/A
BRRLY - FPAFF
20%
Poorly correlated
+1.69%
CUSI - FPAFF
16%
Poorly correlated
-0.54%
FPAFY - FPAFF
13%
Poorly correlated
+4.11%
CIADY - FPAFF
11%
Poorly correlated
+5.84%
CIADF - FPAFF
5%
Poorly correlated
N/A
More