FNF
Price
$60.29
Change
+$1.15 (+1.94%)
Updated
Sep 26, 02:09 PM (EDT)
Capitalization
16.07B
46 days until earnings call
TRRSF
Price
$27.39
Change
-$0.46 (-1.65%)
Updated
Sep 25 closing price
Capitalization
1.31B
Interact to see
Advertisement

FNF vs TRRSF

Header iconFNF vs TRRSF Comparison
Open Charts FNF vs TRRSFBanner chart's image
Fidelity National Financial
Price$60.29
Change+$1.15 (+1.94%)
Volume$400
Capitalization16.07B
Trisura Group
Price$27.39
Change-$0.46 (-1.65%)
Volume$1.82K
Capitalization1.31B
FNF vs TRRSF Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
FNF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
TRRSF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
FNF vs. TRRSF commentary
Sep 26, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FNF is a Buy and TRRSF is a Hold.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Sep 26, 2025
Stock price -- (FNF: $59.14 vs. TRRSF: $27.39)
Brand notoriety: FNF and TRRSF are both not notable
Both companies represent the Specialty Insurance industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: FNF: 66% vs. TRRSF: 3%
Market capitalization -- FNF: $16.07B vs. TRRSF: $1.31B
FNF [@Specialty Insurance] is valued at $16.07B. TRRSF’s [@Specialty Insurance] market capitalization is $1.31B. The market cap for tickers in the [@Specialty Insurance] industry ranges from $16.07B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Specialty Insurance] industry is $3.62B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

FNF’s FA Score shows that 1 FA rating(s) are green whileTRRSF’s FA Score has 0 green FA rating(s).

  • FNF’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
  • TRRSF’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
According to our system of comparison, FNF is a better buy in the long-term than TRRSF.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

FNF’s TA Score shows that 4 TA indicator(s) are bullish while TRRSF’s TA Score has 4 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • FNF’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 3 bearish.
  • TRRSF’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 4 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, FNF is a better buy in the short-term than TRRSF.

Price Growth

FNF (@Specialty Insurance) experienced а -0.05% price change this week, while TRRSF (@Specialty Insurance) price change was -7.05% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Specialty Insurance industry was -0.32%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was -0.66%, and the average quarterly price growth was +11.71%.

Reported Earning Dates

FNF is expected to report earnings on Nov 11, 2025.

Industries' Descriptions

@Specialty Insurance (-0.32% weekly)

Specialty insurance typically caters to niche-markets, and covers items that are special or unique and/or items that are not typically covered under other insurance policies. Restoration or purchase of a one-of-a-kind collector’s item, high-value home, recreational vehicles, sailboat or even jet skis, horses and farms, all-terrain vehicle, funerals, museums and fine art collections are some examples– one or more of which are covered by a specialty insurance provider. In some cases, a specialty insurance could also complement someone’s existing auto, home and umbrella policies. Markel Corp, for Fidelity National Financial, Inc., Assurant, Inc. and Athene Holding Ltd. are examples of specialty insurance providers.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FNF($16.1B) has a higher market cap than TRRSF($1.31B). TRRSF (15.16) and FNF (15.05) have similar P/E ratio . FNF YTD gains are higher at: 8.032 vs. TRRSF (0.403). TRRSF has less debt than FNF: TRRSF (158M) vs FNF (4.78B). FNF has higher revenues than TRRSF: FNF (13.3B) vs TRRSF (839M).
FNFTRRSFFNF / TRRSF
Capitalization16.1B1.31B1,227%
EBITDAN/AN/A-
Gain YTD8.0320.4031,992%
P/E Ratio15.0515.1699%
Revenue13.3B839M1,585%
Total CashN/A1.52B-
Total Debt4.78B158M3,022%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
FNF vs TRRSF: Fundamental Ratings
FNF
TRRSF
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
6929
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
34
Fair valued
86
Overvalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
2262
SMR RATING
1..100
9554
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
5761
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
6885
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
5050

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

FNF's Valuation (34) in the Specialty Insurance industry is somewhat better than the same rating for TRRSF (86) in the null industry. This means that FNF’s stock grew somewhat faster than TRRSF’s over the last 12 months.

FNF's Profit vs Risk Rating (22) in the Specialty Insurance industry is somewhat better than the same rating for TRRSF (62) in the null industry. This means that FNF’s stock grew somewhat faster than TRRSF’s over the last 12 months.

TRRSF's SMR Rating (54) in the null industry is somewhat better than the same rating for FNF (95) in the Specialty Insurance industry. This means that TRRSF’s stock grew somewhat faster than FNF’s over the last 12 months.

FNF's Price Growth Rating (57) in the Specialty Insurance industry is in the same range as TRRSF (61) in the null industry. This means that FNF’s stock grew similarly to TRRSF’s over the last 12 months.

FNF's P/E Growth Rating (68) in the Specialty Insurance industry is in the same range as TRRSF (85) in the null industry. This means that FNF’s stock grew similarly to TRRSF’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
FNFTRRSF
RSI
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
64%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
81%
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
62%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
58%
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
65%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
62%
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
67%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
52%
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
67%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
52%
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
71%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
69%
Bullish Trend 8 days ago
69%
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 11 days ago
51%
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
68%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
68%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
62%
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
66%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
FNF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
TRRSF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
MFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
ENPIX42.05N/A
N/A
ProFunds UltraSector Energy Investor
DAFGX42.33N/A
N/A
Dunham Focused Large Cap Growth A
DIAYX30.83N/A
N/A
Diamond Hill Long-Short Y
IMEGX23.45N/A
N/A
Macquarie Systematic Em Mkts Eq R6
FPADX13.40N/A
N/A
Fidelity Emerging Markets Idx

TRRSF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that TRRSF and RDN have been poorly correlated (+23% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that TRRSF and RDN's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To TRRSF
1D Price
Change %
TRRSF100%
-1.65%
RDN - TRRSF
23%
Poorly correlated
+0.80%
ESNT - TRRSF
22%
Poorly correlated
-0.06%
FNF - TRRSF
22%
Poorly correlated
-1.15%
TIPT - TRRSF
21%
Poorly correlated
-15.21%
MTG - TRRSF
21%
Poorly correlated
-0.46%
More