Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FNGAX vs REEBX
FNGAX vs REEBX Comparison
Open Charts FNGAX vs REEBX
Franklin Intl Growth A
Price$18.28
Change+$0.07 (+0.38%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets865.14M
American Funds EUPAC R2E
Price$60.03
Change+$0.73 (+1.23%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets132.4B
FNGAX vs REEBX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FNGAX vs. REEBX commentary
Aug 08, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FNGAX is a Buy and REEBX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
REEBX has more cash in the bank: 132B vs. FNGAX (865M). FNGAX pays higher dividends than REEBX: FNGAX (1.66) vs REEBX (0.43). FNGAX was incepted earlier than REEBX: FNGAX (17 years) vs REEBX (11 years). REEBX (1.27) is less costly to investors than FNGAX (1.20). REEBX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 35.00 vs. FNGAX (17.56). REEBX has a lower initial minimum investment than FNGAX: REEBX (250) vs FNGAX (1000). FNGAX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 12.95 vs. REEBX (12.30). REEBX return over 5 years is better than : 9.75 vs. FNGAX (-1.34).
| FNGAX | REEBX | FNGAX / REEBX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.12 | 1.27 | 88% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.20 | 1.27 | 94% |
| Fund Existence | 17 years | 11 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 12.738 | 13.801 | 92% |
| Front Load | 6% | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1000 | 250 | 400% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 865M | 132B | 1% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 1.66 | 0.43 | 389% |
| Returns for 1 year | 12.95 | 12.30 | 105% |
| Returns for 3 years | 18.20 | 22.97 | 79% |
| Returns for 5 years | -1.34 | 9.75 | -14% |
| Returns for 10 years | 66.81 | 22.98 | 291% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement