Intraday BUY SELL Signals
Intraday BUY SELL Signals
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FNGG vs QLD
FNGG vs QLD Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FNGG vs. QLD commentary
Nov 21, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FNGG is a Hold and QLD is a Hold.
SUMMARIES
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
QLD has more net assets: 9.93B vs. FNGG (126M). FNGG has a higher annual dividend yield than QLD: FNGG (27.454) vs QLD (19.409). FNGG was incepted earlier than QLD: FNGG (4 years) vs QLD (19 years). QLD (0.95) and FNGG (0.96) have comparable expense ratios . FNGG has a higher turnover QLD (16.00) vs QLD (16.00).
| FNGG | QLD | FNGG / QLD | |
| Gain YTD | 27.454 | 19.409 | 141% |
| Net Assets | 126M | 9.93B | 1% |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.96 | 0.95 | 101% |
| Turnover | 92.00 | 16.00 | 575% |
| Yield | 0.70 | 0.17 | 414% |
| Fund Existence | 4 years | 19 years | - |
TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
| FNGG | QLD | |
|---|---|---|
| RSI ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 89% | 2 days ago 90% |
| Stochastic ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 90% | 2 days ago 88% |
| Momentum ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 84% | 2 days ago 84% |
| MACD ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 88% | 2 days ago 90% |
| TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 87% | 2 days ago 87% |
| TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 90% | 2 days ago 88% |
| Advances ODDS (%) | 18 days ago 90% | 18 days ago 90% |
| Declines ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 88% | 3 days ago 85% |
| BollingerBands ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 90% | 2 days ago 90% |
| Aroon ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 90% | 2 days ago 90% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers
FNGG and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, FNGG has been closely correlated with SHOP. These tickers have moved in lockstep 84% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if FNGG jumps, then SHOP could also see price increases.
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To FNGG | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| FNGG | 100% | -4.43% | ||
| SHOP - FNGG | 84% Closely correlated | -0.99% | ||
| DASH - FNGG | 80% Closely correlated | -7.21% | ||
| NVDA - FNGG | 80% Closely correlated | -3.15% | ||
| U - FNGG | 79% Closely correlated | -3.85% | ||
| AMZN - FNGG | 78% Closely correlated | -2.49% | ||
More | ||||
QLD and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, QLD has been closely correlated with KLAC. These tickers have moved in lockstep 78% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if QLD jumps, then KLAC could also see price increases.
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To QLD | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| QLD | 100% | -4.71% | ||
| KLAC - QLD | 78% Closely correlated | -5.57% | ||
| LRCX - QLD | 78% Closely correlated | -6.19% | ||
| NVDA - QLD | 78% Closely correlated | -3.15% | ||
| AMZN - QLD | 77% Closely correlated | -2.49% | ||
| MSFT - QLD | 75% Closely correlated | -1.60% | ||
More | ||||