Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FNGLX vs RDKTX
FNGLX vs RDKTX Comparison Chart
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FNGLX vs. RDKTX commentary
Jun 13, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FNGLX is a Hold and RDKTX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RDKTX has more cash in the bank: 16.6B vs. FNGLX (715M). FNGLX pays higher dividends than RDKTX: FNGLX (1.50) vs RDKTX (0.81). FNGLX was incepted earlier than RDKTX: FNGLX (8 years) vs RDKTX (10 years). RDKTX (0.74) is less costly to investors than FNGLX (0.46). FNGLX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 14.00 vs. RDKTX (5.00). FNGLX has a lower initial minimum investment than RDKTX: FNGLX (0) vs RDKTX (250). RDKTX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 11.10 vs. FNGLX (9.00). RDKTX return over 5 years is better than : 51.31 vs. FNGLX (46.41).
| FNGLX | RDKTX | FNGLX / RDKTX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.46 | 0.74 | 62% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.46 | 0.74 | 62% |
| Fund Existence | 8 years | 10 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 5.660 | 7.762 | 73% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 250 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 715M | 16.6B | 4% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 1.50 | 0.81 | 184% |
| Returns for 1 year | 9.00 | 11.10 | 81% |
| Returns for 3 years | 44.87 | 41.60 | 108% |
| Returns for 5 years | 46.41 | 51.31 | 90% |
| Returns for 10 years | N/A | 93.37 | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement