FNGR
Price
$2.08
Change
+$0.07 (+3.48%)
Updated
Jul 3 closing price
Capitalization
110.35M
FRTN
Price
$0.03
Change
-$0.00 (-0.00%)
Updated
Jul 3 closing price
Capitalization
82.23K
Interact to see
Advertisement

FNGR vs FRTN

Header iconFNGR vs FRTN Comparison
Open Charts FNGR vs FRTNBanner chart's image
FingerMotion
Price$2.08
Change+$0.07 (+3.48%)
Volume$208.64K
Capitalization110.35M
Fortran
Price$0.03
Change-$0.00 (-0.00%)
Volume$17.1K
Capitalization82.23K
FNGR vs FRTN Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
FNGR
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
FRTN
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
FNGR vs. FRTN commentary
Jul 04, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FNGR is a Hold and FRTN is a Hold.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Jul 04, 2025
Stock price -- (FNGR: $2.08 vs. FRTN: $0.03)
Brand notoriety: FNGR and FRTN are both not notable
Both companies represent the Wireless Telecommunications industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: FNGR: 24% vs. FRTN: 108%
Market capitalization -- FNGR: $110.35M vs. FRTN: $82.23K
FNGR [@Wireless Telecommunications] is valued at $110.35M. FRTN’s [@Wireless Telecommunications] market capitalization is $82.23K. The market cap for tickers in the [@Wireless Telecommunications] industry ranges from $12.88T to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Wireless Telecommunications] industry is $17.77B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

FNGR’s FA Score shows that 0 FA rating(s) are green whileFRTN’s FA Score has 1 green FA rating(s).

  • FNGR’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
  • FRTN’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
According to our system of comparison, FRTN is a better buy in the long-term than FNGR.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

FNGR’s TA Score shows that 5 TA indicator(s) are bullish while FRTN’s TA Score has 1 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • FNGR’s TA Score: 5 bullish, 4 bearish.
  • FRTN’s TA Score: 1 bullish, 3 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, FNGR is a better buy in the short-term than FRTN.

Price Growth

FNGR (@Wireless Telecommunications) experienced а +0.97% price change this week, while FRTN (@Wireless Telecommunications) price change was -0.21% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Wireless Telecommunications industry was +1.68%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +4.16%, and the average quarterly price growth was +38.53%.

Reported Earning Dates

FNGR is expected to report earnings on Jul 03, 2025.

FRTN is expected to report earnings on Nov 18, 2024.

Industries' Descriptions

@Wireless Telecommunications (+1.68% weekly)

Wireless Telecom includes companies that sell wireless antenna or satellite-based communication services. This is the fastest-growing area in communications, as more and more communication and computing happen on mobile devices and cloud-based platforms. Wireless telecom is a key industry for global connectivity, and has even further room for growth in emerging markets and in rural parts of developed nations. People’s growing need for speed in data connectivity, higher resolution, and smoother video streaming and multimedia applications should drive growth and competition within this segment. T-Mobile US, Inc., Vodafone Group, and Sprint Corporation are some major providers of wireless telecom.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FNGR($110M) has a higher market cap than FRTN($82.2K). FNGR YTD gains are higher at: 73.333 vs. FRTN (34.016).
FNGRFRTNFNGR / FRTN
Capitalization110M82.2K133,820%
EBITDA-4.92MN/A-
Gain YTD73.33334.016216%
P/E RatioN/AN/A-
Revenue40.4MN/A-
Total Cash1.94MN/A-
Total Debt35.3KN/A-
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
FNGR vs FRTN: Fundamental Ratings
FNGR
FRTN
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
5585
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
80
Overvalued
78
Overvalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
87100
SMR RATING
1..100
96100
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
4537
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
1001
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
n/a50

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

FRTN's Valuation (78) in the null industry is in the same range as FNGR (80). This means that FRTN’s stock grew similarly to FNGR’s over the last 12 months.

FNGR's Profit vs Risk Rating (87) in the null industry is in the same range as FRTN (100). This means that FNGR’s stock grew similarly to FRTN’s over the last 12 months.

FNGR's SMR Rating (96) in the null industry is in the same range as FRTN (100). This means that FNGR’s stock grew similarly to FRTN’s over the last 12 months.

FRTN's Price Growth Rating (37) in the null industry is in the same range as FNGR (45). This means that FRTN’s stock grew similarly to FNGR’s over the last 12 months.

FRTN's P/E Growth Rating (1) in the null industry is significantly better than the same rating for FNGR (100). This means that FRTN’s stock grew significantly faster than FNGR’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
FNGRFRTN
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
90%
N/A
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
85%
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
87%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
75%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
89%
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
88%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
83%
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
77%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
90%
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
79%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
85%
N/A
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
90%
N/A
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
90%
N/A
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
90%
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
90%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
FNGR
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
FRTN
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
STOCK / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
GUKYF2.25N/A
N/A
Gulf Keystone Petroleum Ltd.
KYSEY8.29N/A
N/A
Kyushu Electric Power
SBDG0.74N/A
N/A
Small Business Development Group, Inc.
VLVOF1.75N/A
N/A
VOLVO CAR AB
KUYAF0.29N/A
-0.01%
Kuya Silver Corp.

FNGR and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that FNGR and VIV have been poorly correlated (+23% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that FNGR and VIV's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To FNGR
1D Price
Change %
FNGR100%
+3.48%
VIV - FNGR
23%
Poorly correlated
+1.29%
AMX - FNGR
22%
Poorly correlated
+0.06%
TV - FNGR
21%
Poorly correlated
+1.30%
ATEX - FNGR
21%
Poorly correlated
+0.60%
LILAK - FNGR
20%
Poorly correlated
+1.54%
More

FRTN and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that FRTN and FNGR have been poorly correlated (+8% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that FRTN and FNGR's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To FRTN
1D Price
Change %
FRTN100%
+9.00%
FNGR - FRTN
8%
Poorly correlated
+3.48%
FULO - FRTN
6%
Poorly correlated
N/A
GMOYF - FRTN
5%
Poorly correlated
N/A
CVHSY - FRTN
3%
Poorly correlated
N/A
ELMUY - FRTN
2%
Poorly correlated
N/A
More