Ad is loading...
Ad is loading...
FNGS vs SMH
FNGS vs SMH Comparison
Open Charts FNGS vs SMH
MicroSectors™ FANG+™ ETN
Price$52.47
Change-$1.48 (-2.74%)
Volume$249.22K
CapitalizationN/A
VanEck Semiconductor ETF
Price$239.95
Change-$8.23 (-3.32%)
Volume$9.5M
CapitalizationN/A
FNGS vs SMH Comparison Chart
Loading...
Show more...
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FNGS vs. SMH commentary
Nov 18, 2024
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FNGS is a StrongSell and SMH is a StrongSell.
SUMMARIES
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
SMH has more net assets: 23.4B vs. FNGS (393M). FNGS (39.030) and SMH (37.216) have matching annual dividend yield . FNGS was incepted earlier than SMH: FNGS (5 years) vs SMH (13 years).
| FNGS | SMH | FNGS / SMH | |
| Gain YTD | 39.030 | 37.216 | 105% |
| Net Assets | 393M | 23.4B | 2% |
| Total Expense Ratio | N/A | N/A | - |
| Turnover | N/A | 18.00 | - |
| Yield | 0.00 | 0.46 | - |
| Fund Existence | 5 years | 13 years | - |
TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
| FNGS | SMH | |
|---|---|---|
| RSI ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 75% | 4 days ago 88% |
| Stochastic ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 69% | 3 days ago 90% |
| Momentum ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 90% | 3 days ago 90% |
| MACD ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 90% | 3 days ago 86% |
| TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 80% | 3 days ago 85% |
| TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 90% | 3 days ago 82% |
| Advances ODDS (%) | 5 days ago 89% | 11 days ago 90% |
| Declines ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 78% | 5 days ago 83% |
| BollingerBands ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 87% | 3 days ago 86% |
| Aroon ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 90% | 3 days ago 85% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Ad is loading...
Show more...
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
FNGS and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, FNGS has been closely correlated with AMZN. These tickers have moved in lockstep 75% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if FNGS jumps, then AMZN could also see price increases.
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To FNGS | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| FNGS | 100% | -2.74% | ||
| AMZN - FNGS | 75% Closely correlated | -4.19% | ||
| META - FNGS | 74% Closely correlated | -4.00% | ||
| MSFT - FNGS | 72% Closely correlated | -2.79% | ||
| GOOGL - FNGS | 62% Loosely correlated | -1.76% | ||
| AAPL - FNGS | 60% Loosely correlated | -1.41% | ||
More | ||||
SMH and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, SMH has been closely correlated with KLAC. These tickers have moved in lockstep 90% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if SMH jumps, then KLAC could also see price increases.
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To SMH | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| SMH | 100% | -3.32% | ||
| KLAC - SMH | 90% Closely correlated | -4.73% | ||
| LRCX - SMH | 89% Closely correlated | -6.34% | ||
| AMAT - SMH | 88% Closely correlated | -9.20% | ||
| ASML - SMH | 85% Closely correlated | -4.95% | ||
| TSM - SMH | 83% Closely correlated | -1.32% | ||
More | ||||