Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FNIAX vs RGEBX
FNIAX vs RGEBX Comparison
Open Charts FNIAX vs RGEBX
Fidelity Advisor New Insights A
Price$47.42
Change-$0.09 (-0.19%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets24.43B
American Funds Growth Fund of Amer R2E
Price$81.40
Change-$0.06 (-0.07%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets329.22B
FNIAX vs RGEBX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FNIAX vs. RGEBX commentary
Aug 17, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FNIAX is a Buy and RGEBX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RGEBX has more cash in the bank: 329B vs. FNIAX (24.4B). FNIAX pays higher dividends than RGEBX: FNIAX (0.02) vs RGEBX (0.00). FNIAX was incepted earlier than RGEBX: FNIAX (22 years) vs RGEBX (11 years). RGEBX (1.09) is less costly to investors than FNIAX (0.90). RGEBX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 25.00 vs. FNIAX (18.00). FNIAX has a lower initial minimum investment than RGEBX: FNIAX (0) vs RGEBX (250). FNIAX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 17.37 vs. RGEBX (13.85). RGEBX return over 5 years is better than : 40.64 vs. FNIAX (34.79).
| FNIAX | RGEBX | FNIAX / RGEBX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.90 | 1.09 | 83% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.90 | 1.09 | 83% |
| Fund Existence | 22 years | 11 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 14.348 | 13.942 | 103% |
| Front Load | 6% | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 250 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 24.4B | 329B | 7% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.02 | 0.00 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | 17.37 | 13.85 | 125% |
| Returns for 3 years | 46.95 | 40.38 | 116% |
| Returns for 5 years | 34.79 | 40.64 | 86% |
| Returns for 10 years | 69.81 | 79.50 | 88% |