FNICF
Price
$0.02
Change
-$0.00 (-0.00%)
Updated
Sep 25 closing price
Capitalization
3.63M
PMMCF
Price
$0.24
Change
+$0.02 (+9.09%)
Updated
Sep 24 closing price
Capitalization
48.06M
Interact to see
Advertisement

FNICF vs PMMCF

Header iconFNICF vs PMMCF Comparison
Open Charts FNICF vs PMMCFBanner chart's image
Fathom Nickel
Price$0.02
Change-$0.00 (-0.00%)
Volume$498.57K
Capitalization3.63M
Andina Copper
Price$0.24
Change+$0.02 (+9.09%)
Volume$28.08K
Capitalization48.06M
FNICF vs PMMCF Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
FNICF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
PMMCF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
FNICF vs. PMMCF commentary
Sep 26, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FNICF is a Hold and PMMCF is a StrongBuy.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Sep 26, 2025
Stock price -- (FNICF: $0.02 vs. PMMCF: $0.24)
Brand notoriety: FNICF and PMMCF are both not notable
Both companies represent the Other Metals/Minerals industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: FNICF: 340% vs. PMMCF: 94%
Market capitalization -- FNICF: $3.63M vs. PMMCF: $48.06M
FNICF [@Other Metals/Minerals] is valued at $3.63M. PMMCF’s [@Other Metals/Minerals] market capitalization is $48.06M. The market cap for tickers in the [@Other Metals/Minerals] industry ranges from $223.12B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Other Metals/Minerals] industry is $2.44B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

FNICF’s FA Score shows that 0 FA rating(s) are green whilePMMCF’s FA Score has 0 green FA rating(s).

  • FNICF’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
  • PMMCF’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
According to our system of comparison, both FNICF and PMMCF are a bad buy in the long-term.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

FNICF’s TA Score shows that 3 TA indicator(s) are bullish while PMMCF’s TA Score has 4 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • FNICF’s TA Score: 3 bullish, 5 bearish.
  • PMMCF’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 4 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, PMMCF is a better buy in the short-term than FNICF.

Price Growth

FNICF (@Other Metals/Minerals) experienced а -16.00% price change this week, while PMMCF (@Other Metals/Minerals) price change was +18.77% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Other Metals/Minerals industry was +5.57%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +42.35%, and the average quarterly price growth was +308.83%.

Industries' Descriptions

@Other Metals/Minerals (+5.57% weekly)

The category includes companies that explore for, mine and extract metals, such as copper, diamonds, nickel, cobalt ore, lead, zinc and uranium. BHP, Rio Tinto and Southern Copper Corporation are major players in this space.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
PMMCF($48.1M) has a higher market cap than FNICF($3.63M). PMMCF YTD gains are higher at: 119.182 vs. FNICF (7.143). FNICF has higher annual earnings (EBITDA): -710.12K vs. PMMCF (-967.41K). PMMCF has more cash in the bank: 208K vs. FNICF (89.3K). FNICF (0) and PMMCF (0) have equivalent revenues.
FNICFPMMCFFNICF / PMMCF
Capitalization3.63M48.1M8%
EBITDA-710.12K-967.41K73%
Gain YTD7.143119.1826%
P/E RatioN/AN/A-
Revenue00-
Total Cash89.3K208K43%
Total DebtN/AN/A-
TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
FNICFPMMCF
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
90%
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
90%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
90%
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
90%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
88%
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
82%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
83%
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
75%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
90%
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
71%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
88%
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
70%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
86%
Bullish Trend 11 days ago
81%
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 8 days ago
90%
Bearish Trend 29 days ago
84%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
90%
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
90%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
70%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
FNICF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
PMMCF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
STOCK / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
BSBK9.240.04
+0.43%
Bogota Financial Corp
EPIX0.20N/A
-0.35%
ESSA Pharma
TLK18.69-0.39
-2.04%
PT Telekomunikasi Indonesia
BLMN7.13-0.30
-4.04%
Bloomin' Brands
AUGO32.89-1.70
-4.91%
Aura Minerals Inc

FNICF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that FNICF and BRIOF have been poorly correlated (+20% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that FNICF and BRIOF's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To FNICF
1D Price
Change %
FNICF100%
N/A
BRIOF - FNICF
20%
Poorly correlated
N/A
RSNUF - FNICF
13%
Poorly correlated
N/A
PMMCF - FNICF
12%
Poorly correlated
N/A
JNOMF - FNICF
5%
Poorly correlated
N/A
CLRSF - FNICF
3%
Poorly correlated
N/A
More

PMMCF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that PMMCF and PGZFF have been poorly correlated (+27% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that PMMCF and PGZFF's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To PMMCF
1D Price
Change %
PMMCF100%
N/A
PGZFF - PMMCF
27%
Poorly correlated
N/A
SUIFF - PMMCF
21%
Poorly correlated
N/A
EEMMF - PMMCF
20%
Poorly correlated
-1.87%
FNICF - PMMCF
12%
Poorly correlated
N/A
ELMTF - PMMCF
4%
Poorly correlated
N/A
More