FNLC
Price
$24.53
Change
-$0.25 (-1.01%)
Updated
Mar 11, 04:59 PM (EDT)
Capitalization
274.25M
MBWM
Price
$43.77
Change
-$0.05 (-0.11%)
Updated
Mar 11, 04:59 PM (EDT)
Capitalization
605.34M
41 days until earnings call
Ad is loading...

FNLC vs MBWM

Header iconFNLC vs MBWM Comparison
Open Charts FNLC vs MBWMBanner chart's image
First Ban
Price$24.53
Change-$0.25 (-1.01%)
Volume$180
Capitalization274.25M
Mercantile Bank
Price$43.77
Change-$0.05 (-0.11%)
Volume$770
Capitalization605.34M
FNLC vs MBWM Comparison Chart
Loading...
FNLC
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
MBWM
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
FNLC vs. MBWM commentary
Mar 12, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FNLC is a StrongBuy and MBWM is a Buy.

Ad is loading...
COMPARISON
Comparison
Mar 12, 2025
Stock price -- (FNLC: $24.78 vs. MBWM: $43.97)
Brand notoriety: FNLC and MBWM are both not notable
Both companies represent the Regional Banks industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: FNLC: 92% vs. MBWM: 84%
Market capitalization -- FNLC: $274.25M vs. MBWM: $605.34M
FNLC [@Regional Banks] is valued at $274.25M. MBWM’s [@Regional Banks] market capitalization is $605.34M. The market cap for tickers in the [@Regional Banks] industry ranges from $133.96B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Regional Banks] industry is $5.89B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

FNLC’s FA Score shows that 1 FA rating(s) are green whileMBWM’s FA Score has 3 green FA rating(s).

  • FNLC’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
  • MBWM’s FA Score: 3 green, 2 red.
According to our system of comparison, MBWM is a better buy in the long-term than FNLC.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

FNLC’s TA Score shows that 3 TA indicator(s) are bullish while MBWM’s TA Score has 5 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • FNLC’s TA Score: 3 bullish, 5 bearish.
  • MBWM’s TA Score: 5 bullish, 5 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, MBWM is a better buy in the short-term than FNLC.

Price Growth

FNLC (@Regional Banks) experienced а -3.69% price change this week, while MBWM (@Regional Banks) price change was -7.82% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Regional Banks industry was -1.57%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was -2.82%, and the average quarterly price growth was +7.47%.

Reported Earning Dates

FNLC is expected to report earnings on Jan 22, 2025.

MBWM is expected to report earnings on Apr 22, 2025.

Industries' Descriptions

@Regional Banks (-1.57% weekly)

Regional banks have a smaller reach than major banks, and cater mostly to one region of a country, such as a state or within a group of states. They offer services often similar – albeit with some limitations/smaller scale – compared to major banks. Taking deposits, making loans, mortgages, leases, credit cards , fund management, insurance and investment banking. SunTrust Banks, State Street Corp., M&T Bank Corp. are some examples of U.S. regional banks.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
MBWM($605M) has a higher market cap than FNLC($274M). FNLC has higher P/E ratio than MBWM: FNLC (9.17) vs MBWM (7.32). MBWM YTD gains are higher at: -0.363 vs. FNLC (-8.177). MBWM has more cash in the bank: 64.6M vs. FNLC (25.1M). FNLC has less debt than MBWM: FNLC (20.1M) vs MBWM (607M). MBWM has higher revenues than FNLC: MBWM (226M) vs FNLC (80.6M).
FNLCMBWMFNLC / MBWM
Capitalization274M605M45%
EBITDAN/AN/A-
Gain YTD-8.177-0.3632,252%
P/E Ratio9.177.32125%
Revenue80.6M226M36%
Total Cash25.1M64.6M39%
Total Debt20.1M607M3%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
FNLC vs MBWM: Fundamental Ratings
FNLC
MBWM
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
1461
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
63
Fair valued
65
Fair valued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
6523
SMR RATING
1..100
4019
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
9898
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
2924
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
n/an/a

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

FNLC's Valuation (63) in the Regional Banks industry is in the same range as MBWM (65). This means that FNLC’s stock grew similarly to MBWM’s over the last 12 months.

MBWM's Profit vs Risk Rating (23) in the Regional Banks industry is somewhat better than the same rating for FNLC (65). This means that MBWM’s stock grew somewhat faster than FNLC’s over the last 12 months.

MBWM's SMR Rating (19) in the Regional Banks industry is in the same range as FNLC (40). This means that MBWM’s stock grew similarly to FNLC’s over the last 12 months.

MBWM's Price Growth Rating (98) in the Regional Banks industry is in the same range as FNLC (98). This means that MBWM’s stock grew similarly to FNLC’s over the last 12 months.

MBWM's P/E Growth Rating (24) in the Regional Banks industry is in the same range as FNLC (29). This means that MBWM’s stock grew similarly to FNLC’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
FNLCMBWM
RSI
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
90%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
71%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
72%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
50%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
58%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
46%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
69%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
51%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
62%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
45%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
56%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 5 days ago
58%
Bullish Trend 12 days ago
67%
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 19 days ago
55%
Bearish Trend 6 days ago
62%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
76%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
72%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 6 days ago
43%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
63%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Ad is loading...
FNLC
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
MBWM
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
MFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
OGLYX95.67N/A
N/A
Invesco Global Y
NRFAX12.31N/A
N/A
Natixis AEW Global Focused Real Estate A
IEMGX9.77N/A
N/A
Voya Multi-Manager Emerging Markets Eq I
BIAVX14.66N/A
N/A
Brown Advisory Beutel GoodmanLg-CpValInv
JEQSX36.39N/A
N/A
Johnson Equity Income S

FNLC and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, FNLC has been closely correlated with STBA. These tickers have moved in lockstep 82% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if FNLC jumps, then STBA could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To FNLC
1D Price
Change %
FNLC100%
-2.82%
STBA - FNLC
82%
Closely correlated
-3.82%
MBWM - FNLC
82%
Closely correlated
-3.51%
NWBI - FNLC
81%
Closely correlated
-1.40%
AROW - FNLC
81%
Closely correlated
-2.46%
HFWA - FNLC
81%
Closely correlated
-1.05%
More

MBWM and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, MBWM has been closely correlated with PEBO. These tickers have moved in lockstep 89% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if MBWM jumps, then PEBO could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To MBWM
1D Price
Change %
MBWM100%
-3.51%
PEBO - MBWM
89%
Closely correlated
-4.00%
TCBK - MBWM
88%
Closely correlated
-3.02%
THFF - MBWM
87%
Closely correlated
-0.92%
NWBI - MBWM
87%
Closely correlated
-1.40%
FMBH - MBWM
86%
Closely correlated
-3.28%
More