FNNCF
Price
$7.12
Change
+$0.12 (+1.71%)
Updated
Jul 3 closing price
Capitalization
270.04M
PVLUF
Price
$100.19
Change
-$5.09 (-4.83%)
Updated
Jun 27 closing price
Capitalization
N/A
Interact to see
Advertisement

FNNCF vs PVLUF

Header iconFNNCF vs PVLUF Comparison
Open Charts FNNCF vs PVLUFBanner chart's image
Financial 15 Split
Price$7.12
Change+$0.12 (+1.71%)
Volume$300
Capitalization270.04M
Partners Value Invts
Price$100.19
Change-$5.09 (-4.83%)
Volume$300
CapitalizationN/A
FNNCF vs PVLUF Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
FNNCF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
PVLUF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
FNNCF vs. PVLUF commentary
Jul 07, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FNNCF is a Buy and PVLUF is a Hold.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Jul 07, 2025
Stock price -- (FNNCF: $7.12 vs. PVLUF: $100.19)
Brand notoriety: FNNCF and PVLUF are both not notable
Both companies represent the Investment Managers industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: FNNCF: 87% vs. PVLUF: 60%
Market capitalization -- FNNCF: $270.04M vs. PVLUF: $0
FNNCF [@Investment Managers] is valued at $270.04M. PVLUF’s [@Investment Managers] market capitalization is $0. The market cap for tickers in the [@Investment Managers] industry ranges from $124.17B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Investment Managers] industry is $6.16B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

FNNCF’s FA Score shows that 2 FA rating(s) are green whilePVLUF’s FA Score has 1 green FA rating(s).

  • FNNCF’s FA Score: 2 green, 3 red.
  • PVLUF’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
According to our system of comparison, both FNNCF and PVLUF are a good buy in the long-term.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

FNNCF’s TA Score shows that 2 TA indicator(s) are bullish while PVLUF’s TA Score has 3 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • FNNCF’s TA Score: 2 bullish, 2 bearish.
  • PVLUF’s TA Score: 3 bullish, 1 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, PVLUF is a better buy in the short-term than FNNCF.

Price Growth

FNNCF (@Investment Managers) experienced а +1.75% price change this week, while PVLUF (@Investment Managers) price change was -4.84% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Investment Managers industry was +2.17%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +6.54%, and the average quarterly price growth was +10.33%.

Reported Earning Dates

FNNCF is expected to report earnings on Feb 25, 2025.

Industries' Descriptions

@Investment Managers (+2.17% weekly)

Investment Managers manage financial assets and other investments of clients. Management includes designing a short- or long-term strategy for buying/holding and selling of portfolio holdings. It can also include tax services and other aspects of financial planning as well. While it is perceived that the industry is faced with growing competition from robo-advisors/digital platforms and passive/ index-tracking funds, many investors still find value in actively managed in-person services that investment management companies often emphasize on. At the same time, many wealth managers are also incorporating digital initiatives/low cost options in addition to their in-person customized services. Their main sources of revenues are fees as a percentage of assets under management, in addition to a certain portion of clients’ gains from asset appreciation. BlackRock, Inc., Blackstone Group Inc and Brookfield Asset Management are some of the major investment management companies.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
PVLUF YTD gains are higher at: 99.771 vs. FNNCF (10.942).
FNNCFPVLUFFNNCF / PVLUF
Capitalization270MN/A-
EBITDAN/AN/A-
Gain YTD10.94299.77111%
P/E RatioN/AN/A-
Revenue-2.58MN/A-
Total CashN/AN/A-
Total DebtN/AN/A-
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
FNNCF vs PVLUF: Fundamental Ratings
FNNCF
PVLUF
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
5050
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
1
Undervalued
49
Fair valued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
1003
SMR RATING
1..100
23100
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
4439
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
93100
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
n/a55

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

FNNCF's Valuation (1) in the null industry is somewhat better than the same rating for PVLUF (49). This means that FNNCF’s stock grew somewhat faster than PVLUF’s over the last 12 months.

PVLUF's Profit vs Risk Rating (3) in the null industry is significantly better than the same rating for FNNCF (100). This means that PVLUF’s stock grew significantly faster than FNNCF’s over the last 12 months.

FNNCF's SMR Rating (23) in the null industry is significantly better than the same rating for PVLUF (100). This means that FNNCF’s stock grew significantly faster than PVLUF’s over the last 12 months.

PVLUF's Price Growth Rating (39) in the null industry is in the same range as FNNCF (44). This means that PVLUF’s stock grew similarly to FNNCF’s over the last 12 months.

FNNCF's P/E Growth Rating (93) in the null industry is in the same range as PVLUF (100). This means that FNNCF’s stock grew similarly to PVLUF’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
FNNCFPVLUF
RSI
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
25%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
35%
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
41%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
N/A
N/A
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
34%
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
6%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
35%
N/A
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
27%
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
2%
Advances
ODDS (%)
N/A
N/A
Declines
ODDS (%)
N/A
N/A
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
47%
N/A
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
30%
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
43%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
FNNCF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
PVLUF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
MFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
HRCUX63.280.65
+1.04%
Carillon ClariVest Capital Apprec R6
MAMEX21.380.14
+0.66%
MoA Mid Cap Equity Index Fund
CEYRX98.560.63
+0.64%
Calvert Equity R6
FSZZX10.270.04
+0.39%
Fidelity Advisor Sustainable EM Eq Z
DHIAX19.870.07
+0.35%
Diamond Hill International Inv

FNNCF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that FNNCF and TPG have been poorly correlated (+31% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that FNNCF and TPG's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To FNNCF
1D Price
Change %
FNNCF100%
+1.75%
TPG - FNNCF
31%
Poorly correlated
+0.75%
PAX - FNNCF
31%
Poorly correlated
+1.33%
CG - FNNCF
30%
Poorly correlated
+2.30%
CYMBF - FNNCF
30%
Poorly correlated
N/A
ARES - FNNCF
28%
Poorly correlated
-0.01%
More

PVLUF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that PVLUF and ITPC have been poorly correlated (+0% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that PVLUF and ITPC's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To PVLUF
1D Price
Change %
PVLUF100%
N/A
ITPC - PVLUF
0%
Poorly correlated
N/A
LGCP - PVLUF
0%
Poorly correlated
N/A
HFAHF - PVLUF
-0%
Poorly correlated
N/A
ELRNF - PVLUF
-0%
Poorly correlated
N/A
FNNCF - PVLUF
-0%
Poorly correlated
+1.75%
More