FNNCF
Price
$7.71
Change
-$0.07 (-0.90%)
Updated
Nov 18 closing price
Capitalization
521.48M
Intraday BUY SELL Signals
QUCT
Price
$2075.00
Change
-$0.00 (-0.00%)
Updated
Nov 18 closing price
Capitalization
96.96M
Intraday BUY SELL Signals
Interact to see
Advertisement

FNNCF vs QUCT

Header iconFNNCF vs QUCT Comparison
Open Charts FNNCF vs QUCTBanner chart's image
Financial 15 Split
Price$7.71
Change-$0.07 (-0.90%)
Volume$425
Capitalization521.48M
Queen City Investments
Price$2075.00
Change-$0.00 (-0.00%)
Volume$1
Capitalization96.96M
FNNCF vs QUCT Comparison Chart in %
FNNCF
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
QUCT
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
FNNCF vs. QUCT commentary
Nov 20, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FNNCF is a Hold and QUCT is a Hold.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Nov 20, 2025
Stock price -- (FNNCF: $7.71 vs. QUCT: $2075.00)
Brand notoriety: FNNCF and QUCT are both not notable
Both companies represent the Investment Managers industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: FNNCF: 19% vs. QUCT: 4%
Market capitalization -- FNNCF: $526.24M vs. QUCT: $96.96M
FNNCF [@Investment Managers] is valued at $526.24M. QUCT’s [@Investment Managers] market capitalization is $96.96M. The market cap for tickers in the [@Investment Managers] industry ranges from $157.43B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Investment Managers] industry is $6.92B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

FNNCF’s FA Score shows that 3 FA rating(s) are green whileQUCT’s FA Score has 1 green FA rating(s).

  • FNNCF’s FA Score: 3 green, 2 red.
  • QUCT’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
According to our system of comparison, FNNCF is a better buy in the long-term than QUCT.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

FNNCF’s TA Score shows that 2 TA indicator(s) are bullish while QUCT’s TA Score has 2 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • FNNCF’s TA Score: 2 bullish, 5 bearish.
  • QUCT’s TA Score: 2 bullish, 5 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, FNNCF is a better buy in the short-term than QUCT.

Price Growth

FNNCF (@Investment Managers) experienced а -1.45% price change this week, while QUCT (@Investment Managers) price change was -0.72% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Investment Managers industry was -2.52%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was -1.86%, and the average quarterly price growth was +11.02%.

Industries' Descriptions

@Investment Managers (-2.52% weekly)

Investment Managers manage financial assets and other investments of clients. Management includes designing a short- or long-term strategy for buying/holding and selling of portfolio holdings. It can also include tax services and other aspects of financial planning as well. While it is perceived that the industry is faced with growing competition from robo-advisors/digital platforms and passive/ index-tracking funds, many investors still find value in actively managed in-person services that investment management companies often emphasize on. At the same time, many wealth managers are also incorporating digital initiatives/low cost options in addition to their in-person customized services. Their main sources of revenues are fees as a percentage of assets under management, in addition to a certain portion of clients’ gains from asset appreciation. BlackRock, Inc., Blackstone Group Inc and Brookfield Asset Management are some of the major investment management companies.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FNNCF($521M) has a higher market cap than QUCT($97M). QUCT YTD gains are higher at: 54.453 vs. FNNCF (32.103).
FNNCFQUCTFNNCF / QUCT
Capitalization521M97M537%
EBITDAN/AN/A-
Gain YTD32.10354.45359%
P/E Ratio3.67N/A-
Revenue237MN/A-
Total CashN/AN/A-
Total DebtN/AN/A-
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
FNNCF vs QUCT: Fundamental Ratings
FNNCF
QUCT
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
9344
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
1
Undervalued
33
Fair valued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
63100
SMR RATING
1..100
26100
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
4342
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
25100
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
4350

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

FNNCF's Valuation (1) in the null industry is in the same range as QUCT (33). This means that FNNCF’s stock grew similarly to QUCT’s over the last 12 months.

FNNCF's Profit vs Risk Rating (63) in the null industry is somewhat better than the same rating for QUCT (100). This means that FNNCF’s stock grew somewhat faster than QUCT’s over the last 12 months.

FNNCF's SMR Rating (26) in the null industry is significantly better than the same rating for QUCT (100). This means that FNNCF’s stock grew significantly faster than QUCT’s over the last 12 months.

QUCT's Price Growth Rating (42) in the null industry is in the same range as FNNCF (43). This means that QUCT’s stock grew similarly to FNNCF’s over the last 12 months.

FNNCF's P/E Growth Rating (25) in the null industry is significantly better than the same rating for QUCT (100). This means that FNNCF’s stock grew significantly faster than QUCT’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
FNNCFQUCT
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
30%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
23%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
39%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
31%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
38%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
26%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
31%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
28%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
32%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
21%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
31%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
44%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 23 days ago
53%
Bullish Trend about 1 month ago
38%
Declines
ODDS (%)
N/A
N/A
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
23%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
47%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
39%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
FNNCF
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
QUCT
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
STOCK / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
GGDVY46.96N/A
N/A
Guangdong Investment Ltd.
OXBC40.40N/A
N/A
Oxford Bank Corporation
MRVSY5.00N/A
N/A
Minerva S.A.
ANCTF49.81-0.05
-0.10%
Alimentation Couche-Tard Inc.
ELLH13.00-0.62
-4.54%
Elah Holdings Inc.

FNNCF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that FNNCF and TPG have been poorly correlated (+31% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that FNNCF and TPG's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To FNNCF
1D Price
Change %
FNNCF100%
-0.90%
TPG - FNNCF
31%
Poorly correlated
-0.65%
PAX - FNNCF
31%
Poorly correlated
+1.79%
CG - FNNCF
30%
Poorly correlated
+0.56%
CYMBF - FNNCF
30%
Poorly correlated
N/A
ARES - FNNCF
28%
Poorly correlated
+0.44%
More

QUCT and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that QUCT and FNNCF have been poorly correlated (+17% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that QUCT and FNNCF's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To QUCT
1D Price
Change %
QUCT100%
N/A
FNNCF - QUCT
17%
Poorly correlated
-0.90%
CLSPF - QUCT
8%
Poorly correlated
N/A
FNCSF - QUCT
6%
Poorly correlated
N/A
ITPC - QUCT
0%
Poorly correlated
N/A
HFAHF - QUCT
-0%
Poorly correlated
N/A
More