It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).
FNNNF’s FA Score shows that 1 FA rating(s) are green whileHRBR’s FA Score has 1 green FA rating(s).
It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.
If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.
FNNNF’s TA Score shows that 3 TA indicator(s) are bullish while HRBR’s TA Score has 3 bullish TA indicator(s).
FNNNF (@Airlines) experienced а 0.00% price change this week, while HRBR (@Airlines) price change was -10.00% for the same time period.
The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Airlines industry was +0.30%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +7.71%, and the average quarterly price growth was +11.24%.
HRBR is expected to report earnings on Nov 18, 2024.
Airlines industry comprises passenger air transportation, including scheduled and non-scheduled routes. This can include charter airlines, as well as regular commuter ones. Discount pricing and the rise of low-cost carriers over recent decades have expanded the industry by making its services accessible to a much larger global population, compared to the older days when airline travel was a relative luxury for many people in the world. Delta Air Lines Inc., Southwest Airlines Co and United Continental Holdings, Inc. are some of the airlines with the largest stock market capitalizations in the U.S.
FNNNF | HRBR | FNNNF / HRBR | |
Capitalization | 467M | 52.7M | 886% |
EBITDA | 495M | N/A | - |
Gain YTD | -16.667 | -55.882 | 30% |
P/E Ratio | 5.01 | N/A | - |
Revenue | 2.99B | N/A | - |
Total Cash | 908M | N/A | - |
Total Debt | 1.74B | N/A | - |
FNNNF | HRBR | ||
---|---|---|---|
OUTLOOK RATING 1..100 | 22 | 25 | |
VALUATION overvalued / fair valued / undervalued 1..100 | 55 Fair valued | 53 Fair valued | |
PROFIT vs RISK RATING 1..100 | 100 | 62 | |
SMR RATING 1..100 | 60 | 59 | |
PRICE GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 61 | 83 | |
P/E GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 4 | 6 | |
SEASONALITY SCORE 1..100 | n/a | n/a |
Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.
HRBR's Valuation (53) in the null industry is in the same range as FNNNF (55). This means that HRBR’s stock grew similarly to FNNNF’s over the last 12 months.
HRBR's Profit vs Risk Rating (62) in the null industry is somewhat better than the same rating for FNNNF (100). This means that HRBR’s stock grew somewhat faster than FNNNF’s over the last 12 months.
HRBR's SMR Rating (59) in the null industry is in the same range as FNNNF (60). This means that HRBR’s stock grew similarly to FNNNF’s over the last 12 months.
FNNNF's Price Growth Rating (61) in the null industry is in the same range as HRBR (83). This means that FNNNF’s stock grew similarly to HRBR’s over the last 12 months.
FNNNF's P/E Growth Rating (4) in the null industry is in the same range as HRBR (6). This means that FNNNF’s stock grew similarly to HRBR’s over the last 12 months.
FNNNF | HRBR | |
---|---|---|
RSI ODDS (%) | 2 days ago89% | N/A |
Stochastic ODDS (%) | 2 days ago78% | 2 days ago66% |
Momentum ODDS (%) | 2 days ago59% | 2 days ago82% |
MACD ODDS (%) | 2 days ago39% | 2 days ago80% |
TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 2 days ago46% | 2 days ago78% |
TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 2 days ago49% | 2 days ago80% |
Advances ODDS (%) | N/A | 19 days ago64% |
Declines ODDS (%) | N/A | 6 days ago74% |
BollingerBands ODDS (%) | 2 days ago88% | 7 days ago59% |
Aroon ODDS (%) | 2 days ago67% | N/A |
A.I.dvisor tells us that FNNNF and HRBR have been poorly correlated (+3% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that FNNNF and HRBR's prices will move in lockstep.
Ticker / NAME | Correlation To FNNNF | 1D Price Change % | ||
---|---|---|---|---|
FNNNF | 100% | N/A | ||
HRBR - FNNNF | 3% Poorly correlated | N/A | ||
NWARF - FNNNF | 2% Poorly correlated | +0.29% | ||
JAPSY - FNNNF | 1% Poorly correlated | -0.63% | ||
RYAOF - FNNNF | 0% Poorly correlated | N/A | ||
JPNRF - FNNNF | -0% Poorly correlated | N/A | ||
More |
A.I.dvisor tells us that HRBR and CHEAF have been poorly correlated (+20% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that HRBR and CHEAF's prices will move in lockstep.
Ticker / NAME | Correlation To HRBR | 1D Price Change % | ||
---|---|---|---|---|
HRBR | 100% | N/A | ||
CHEAF - HRBR | 20% Poorly correlated | +64.85% | ||
NWARF - HRBR | 5% Poorly correlated | +0.29% | ||
FNNNF - HRBR | 3% Poorly correlated | N/A | ||
QUBSF - HRBR | -1% Poorly correlated | N/A | ||
QABSY - HRBR | -3% Poorly correlated | +2.48% | ||
More |