Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FNPFX vs LSNGX
FNPFX vs LSNGX Comparison
Open Charts FNPFX vs LSNGX
American Funds New Perspective F3
Price$74.14
Change+$0.14 (+0.19%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets162.58B
Loomis Sayles Global Growth N
Price$25.43
Change-$0.01 (-0.04%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets136.7M
FNPFX vs LSNGX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FNPFX vs. LSNGX commentary
Oct 18, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FNPFX is a Hold and LSNGX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FNPFX has more cash in the bank: 163B vs. LSNGX (137M). FNPFX pays higher dividends than LSNGX: FNPFX (0.75) vs LSNGX (0.00). FNPFX was incepted earlier than LSNGX: FNPFX (9 years) vs LSNGX (9 years). LSNGX (1.06) is less costly to investors than FNPFX (0.41). FNPFX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 24.00 vs. LSNGX (6.00). FNPFX (1000000) and LSNGX (1000000) have matching initial minimum investment requirements. LSNGX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 25.63 vs. FNPFX (13.16). LSNGX return over 5 years is better than : 40.17 vs. FNPFX (36.71).
| FNPFX | LSNGX | FNPFX / LSNGX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.41 | 0.90 | 46% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.41 | 1.06 | 39% |
| Fund Existence | 9 years | 9 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 19.388 | 21.201 | 91% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1000000 | 1000000 | 100% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 163B | 137M | 118,978% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.75 | 0.00 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | 13.16 | 25.63 | 51% |
| Returns for 3 years | 62.67 | 98.59 | 64% |
| Returns for 5 years | 36.71 | 40.17 | 91% |
| Returns for 10 years | N/A | N/A | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement