Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FNPFX vs MECDX
FNPFX vs MECDX Comparison
Open Charts FNPFX vs MECDX
American Funds New Perspective F3
Price$67.59
Change-$0.81 (-1.18%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets152.4B
NYLI Epoch Capital Growth
Price$15.28
Change-$0.25 (-1.61%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets148.35M
FNPFX vs MECDX Comparison Chart
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FNPFX vs. MECDX commentary
Jun 15, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FNPFX is a Buy and MECDX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FNPFX has more cash in the bank: 152B vs. MECDX (148M). FNPFX pays higher dividends than MECDX: FNPFX (0.82) vs MECDX (0.38). FNPFX was incepted earlier than MECDX: FNPFX (8 years) vs MECDX (9 years). MECDX (1.23) is less costly to investors than FNPFX (0.41). MECDX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 33.00 vs. FNPFX (24.00). MECDX has a lower initial minimum investment than FNPFX: MECDX (15000) vs FNPFX (1000000). FNPFX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 9.28 vs. MECDX (0.11). FNPFX return over 5 years is better than : 49.86 vs. MECDX (17.75).
| FNPFX | MECDX | FNPFX / MECDX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.41 | 1.15 | 36% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.41 | 1.23 | 33% |
| Fund Existence | 8 years | 9 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 8.841 | 3.313 | 267% |
| Front Load | N/A | 6% | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1000000 | 15000 | 6,667% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 152B | 148M | 102,703% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.82 | 0.38 | 215% |
| Returns for 1 year | 9.28 | 0.11 | 8,291% |
| Returns for 3 years | 44.00 | 53.34 | 82% |
| Returns for 5 years | 49.86 | 17.75 | 281% |
| Returns for 10 years | N/A | N/A | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers