Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FNPFX vs MGFLX
FNPFX vs MGFLX Comparison
Open Charts FNPFX vs MGFLX
FNPFX vs MGFLX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FNPFX vs. MGFLX commentary
Jun 27, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FNPFX is a Hold and MGFLX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FNPFX has more cash in the bank: 172B vs. MGFLX (141M). FNPFX pays higher dividends than MGFLX: FNPFX (1.23) vs MGFLX (0.00). FNPFX was incepted earlier than MGFLX: FNPFX (9 years) vs MGFLX (22 years). MGFLX (1.23) is less costly to investors than FNPFX (0.40). MGFLX (24.00) and FNPFX (23.00) have comparable annual turnover. MGFLX has a lower initial minimum investment than FNPFX: MGFLX (0) vs FNPFX (1000000). FNPFX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 8.54 vs. MGFLX (-18.71). FNPFX return over 5 years is better than : 14.82 vs. MGFLX (-55.83).
| FNPFX | MGFLX | FNPFX / MGFLX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.40 | 1.23 | 33% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.40 | 1.23 | 33% |
| Fund Existence | 9 years | 22 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 4.914 | 6.274 | 78% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1000000 | 0 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 172B | 141M | 121,986% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 1.23 | 0.00 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | 8.54 | -18.71 | -46% |
| Returns for 3 years | 40.19 | -26.55 | -151% |
| Returns for 5 years | 14.82 | -55.83 | -27% |
| Returns for 10 years | N/A | -29.02 | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement