Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FNPFX vs MLMCX
FNPFX vs MLMCX Comparison
Open Charts FNPFX vs MLMCX
American Funds New Perspective F3
Price$73.64
Change+$0.46 (+0.63%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets161.64B
Morgan Stanley Instl Global Core C
Price$22.60
Change-$0.01 (-0.04%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets49.07M
FNPFX vs MLMCX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FNPFX vs. MLMCX commentary
Sep 16, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FNPFX is a Buy and MLMCX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FNPFX has more cash in the bank: 162B vs. MLMCX (49.1M). FNPFX pays higher dividends than MLMCX: FNPFX (0.77) vs MLMCX (0.00). FNPFX was incepted earlier than MLMCX: FNPFX (9 years) vs MLMCX (9 years). MLMCX (2.80) is less costly to investors than FNPFX (0.41). MLMCX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 39.00 vs. FNPFX (24.00). MLMCX has a lower initial minimum investment than FNPFX: MLMCX (1000) vs FNPFX (1000000). MLMCX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 18.95 vs. FNPFX (14.89). MLMCX return over 5 years is better than : 65.81 vs. FNPFX (38.31).
| FNPFX | MLMCX | FNPFX / MLMCX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.41 | 2.10 | 20% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.41 | 2.80 | 15% |
| Fund Existence | 9 years | 9 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 17.842 | 14.546 | 123% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1000000 | 1000 | 100,000% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 162B | 49.1M | 329,939% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.77 | 0.00 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | 14.89 | 18.95 | 79% |
| Returns for 3 years | 51.94 | 63.29 | 82% |
| Returns for 5 years | 38.31 | 65.81 | 58% |
| Returns for 10 years | N/A | N/A | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement