Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FNPFX vs MLMCX
FNPFX vs MLMCX Comparison
Open Charts FNPFX vs MLMCX
American Funds New Perspective F3
Price$69.18
Change+$0.63 (+0.92%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets152.59B
Morgan Stanley Instl Global Core C
Price$20.63
Change-$0.05 (-0.24%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets43.45M
FNPFX vs MLMCX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FNPFX vs. MLMCX commentary
Jun 27, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FNPFX is a Buy and MLMCX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FNPFX has more cash in the bank: 153B vs. MLMCX (43.5M). FNPFX pays higher dividends than MLMCX: FNPFX (0.82) vs MLMCX (0.00). FNPFX was incepted earlier than MLMCX: FNPFX (8 years) vs MLMCX (9 years). MLMCX (2.80) is less costly to investors than FNPFX (0.41). MLMCX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 39.00 vs. FNPFX (24.00). MLMCX has a lower initial minimum investment than FNPFX: MLMCX (1000) vs FNPFX (1000000). FNPFX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 11.33 vs. MLMCX (9.85). MLMCX return over 5 years is better than : 72.35 vs. FNPFX (51.74).
| FNPFX | MLMCX | FNPFX / MLMCX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.41 | 2.10 | 20% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.41 | 2.80 | 15% |
| Fund Existence | 8 years | 9 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 11.401 | 4.562 | 250% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1000000 | 1000 | 100,000% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 153B | 43.5M | 351,724% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.82 | 0.00 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | 11.33 | 9.85 | 115% |
| Returns for 3 years | 41.37 | 51.80 | 80% |
| Returns for 5 years | 51.74 | 72.35 | 72% |
| Returns for 10 years | N/A | N/A | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement