Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FNPFX vs MLMCX
FNPFX vs MLMCX Comparison
Open Charts FNPFX vs MLMCX
American Funds New Perspective F3
Price$74.28
Change-$0.42 (-0.56%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets164.4B
Morgan Stanley Instl Global Core C
Price$22.97
Change-$0.11 (-0.48%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets52.29M
FNPFX vs MLMCX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FNPFX vs. MLMCX commentary
Oct 08, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FNPFX is a Hold and MLMCX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FNPFX has more cash in the bank: 164B vs. MLMCX (52.3M). FNPFX pays higher dividends than MLMCX: FNPFX (0.75) vs MLMCX (0.00). FNPFX was incepted earlier than MLMCX: FNPFX (9 years) vs MLMCX (9 years). MLMCX (2.80) is less costly to investors than FNPFX (0.41). MLMCX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 39.00 vs. FNPFX (24.00). MLMCX has a lower initial minimum investment than FNPFX: MLMCX (1000) vs FNPFX (1000000). MLMCX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 19.09 vs. FNPFX (14.29). MLMCX return over 5 years is better than : 61.62 vs. FNPFX (38.01).
| FNPFX | MLMCX | FNPFX / MLMCX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.41 | 2.10 | 20% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.41 | 2.80 | 15% |
| Fund Existence | 9 years | 9 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 19.614 | 16.979 | 116% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1000000 | 1000 | 100,000% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 164B | 52.3M | 313,576% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.75 | 0.00 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | 14.29 | 19.09 | 75% |
| Returns for 3 years | 64.74 | 78.50 | 82% |
| Returns for 5 years | 38.01 | 61.62 | 62% |
| Returns for 10 years | N/A | N/A | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement