Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FNPFX vs MLNCX
FNPFX vs MLNCX Comparison
Open Charts FNPFX vs MLNCX
American Funds New Perspective F3
Price$74.28
Change-$0.42 (-0.56%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets164.4B
Morgan Stanley Instl Glbl Concntr C
Price$26.38
Change-$0.04 (-0.15%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets356.16M
FNPFX vs MLNCX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FNPFX vs. MLNCX commentary
Oct 08, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FNPFX is a Buy and MLNCX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FNPFX has more cash in the bank: 164B vs. MLNCX (356M). FNPFX pays higher dividends than MLNCX: FNPFX (0.75) vs MLNCX (0.00). FNPFX was incepted earlier than MLNCX: FNPFX (9 years) vs MLNCX (9 years). MLNCX (2.10) is less costly to investors than FNPFX (0.41). MLNCX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 43.00 vs. FNPFX (24.00). MLNCX has a lower initial minimum investment than FNPFX: MLNCX (1000) vs FNPFX (1000000). MLNCX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 20.62 vs. FNPFX (14.29). MLNCX return over 5 years is better than : 72.98 vs. FNPFX (38.01).
| FNPFX | MLNCX | FNPFX / MLNCX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.41 | 2.10 | 20% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.41 | 2.10 | 20% |
| Fund Existence | 9 years | 9 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 19.614 | 19.313 | 102% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1000000 | 1000 | 100,000% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 164B | 356M | 46,067% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.75 | 0.00 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | 14.29 | 20.62 | 69% |
| Returns for 3 years | 64.74 | 94.69 | 68% |
| Returns for 5 years | 38.01 | 72.98 | 52% |
| Returns for 10 years | N/A | N/A | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers