Ad is loading...
FNPFX vs NBSSX
FNPFX vs NBSSX Comparison
Open Charts FNPFX vs NBSSX
American Funds New Perspective F3
Price$61.68
Change+$0.52 (+0.85%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets138.68B
Neuberger Berman Focus Investor
Price$29.56
Change+$0.08 (+0.27%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets683.52M
FNPFX vs NBSSX Comparison Chart
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FNPFX vs. NBSSX commentary
Apr 28, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FNPFX is a Buy and NBSSX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FNPFX has more cash in the bank: 139B vs. NBSSX (684M). FNPFX pays higher dividends than NBSSX: FNPFX (0.90) vs NBSSX (0.12). FNPFX was incepted earlier than NBSSX: FNPFX (8 years) vs NBSSX (70 years). NBSSX (0.91) is less costly to investors than FNPFX (0.41). NBSSX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 38.00 vs. FNPFX (24.00). NBSSX has a lower initial minimum investment than FNPFX: NBSSX (1000) vs FNPFX (1000000). NBSSX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 10.63 vs. FNPFX (6.03). FNPFX return over 5 years is better than : 50.60 vs. NBSSX (34.28).
| FNPFX | NBSSX | FNPFX / NBSSX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.41 | 0.91 | 45% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.41 | 0.91 | 45% |
| Fund Existence | 8 years | 70 years | - |
| Gain YTD | -0.676 | -2.731 | 25% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1000000 | 1000 | 100,000% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 139B | 684M | 20,322% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.90 | 0.12 | 756% |
| Returns for 1 year | 6.03 | 10.63 | 57% |
| Returns for 3 years | 17.64 | 30.92 | 57% |
| Returns for 5 years | 50.60 | 34.28 | 148% |
| Returns for 10 years | N/A | 12.69 | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Ad is loading...
Interesting Tickers