Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FNPFX vs NBSSX
FNPFX vs NBSSX Comparison
Open Charts FNPFX vs NBSSX
American Funds New Perspective F3
Price$66.06
Change+$0.06 (+0.09%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets147.5B
Neuberger Berman Focus Investor
Price$31.80
Change+$0.01 (+0.03%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets732.06M
FNPFX vs NBSSX Comparison Chart
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FNPFX vs. NBSSX commentary
May 23, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FNPFX is a Buy and NBSSX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FNPFX has more cash in the bank: 148B vs. NBSSX (732M). FNPFX pays higher dividends than NBSSX: FNPFX (0.88) vs NBSSX (0.12). FNPFX was incepted earlier than NBSSX: FNPFX (8 years) vs NBSSX (70 years). NBSSX (0.91) is less costly to investors than FNPFX (0.41). NBSSX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 38.00 vs. FNPFX (24.00). NBSSX has a lower initial minimum investment than FNPFX: NBSSX (1000) vs FNPFX (1000000). NBSSX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 12.86 vs. FNPFX (7.90). FNPFX return over 5 years is better than : 52.18 vs. NBSSX (34.08).
| FNPFX | NBSSX | FNPFX / NBSSX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.41 | 0.91 | 45% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.41 | 0.91 | 45% |
| Fund Existence | 8 years | 70 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 6.377 | 4.607 | 138% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1000000 | 1000 | 100,000% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 148B | 732M | 20,219% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.88 | 0.12 | 747% |
| Returns for 1 year | 7.90 | 12.86 | 61% |
| Returns for 3 years | 31.64 | 49.33 | 64% |
| Returns for 5 years | 52.18 | 34.08 | 153% |
| Returns for 10 years | N/A | 19.63 | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement