Ad is loading...
FNPFX vs PRGSX
FNPFX vs PRGSX Comparison
Open Charts FNPFX vs PRGSX
American Funds New Perspective F3
Price$63.60
Change+$0.12 (+0.19%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets142.07B
T. Rowe Price Global Stock
Price$62.67
Change-$0.07 (-0.11%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets6.49B
FNPFX vs PRGSX Comparison Chart
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FNPFX vs. PRGSX commentary
May 10, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FNPFX is a Buy and PRGSX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FNPFX has more cash in the bank: 142B vs. PRGSX (6.49B). FNPFX pays higher dividends than PRGSX: FNPFX (0.88) vs PRGSX (0.07). FNPFX was incepted earlier than PRGSX: FNPFX (8 years) vs PRGSX (29 years). PRGSX (0.80) is less costly to investors than FNPFX (0.41). PRGSX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 139.20 vs. FNPFX (24.00). PRGSX has a lower initial minimum investment than FNPFX: PRGSX (2500) vs FNPFX (1000000). FNPFX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 5.73 vs. PRGSX (-1.18). FNPFX return over 5 years is better than : 48.51 vs. PRGSX (39.36).
| FNPFX | PRGSX | FNPFX / PRGSX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.41 | 0.80 | 51% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.41 | 0.80 | 51% |
| Fund Existence | 8 years | 29 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 2.415 | -0.175 | -1,380% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1000000 | 2500 | 40,000% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 142B | 6.49B | 2,188% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.88 | 0.07 | 1,193% |
| Returns for 1 year | 5.73 | -1.18 | -487% |
| Returns for 3 years | 28.52 | 34.63 | 82% |
| Returns for 5 years | 48.51 | 39.36 | 123% |
| Returns for 10 years | N/A | 131.47 | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Ad is loading...