Ad is loading...
FNPIX vs RYCCX
FNPIX vs RYCCX Comparison Chart
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FNPIX vs. RYCCX commentary
May 09, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FNPIX is a Buy and RYCCX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RYCCX has more cash in the bank: 778M vs. FNPIX (21.2M). FNPIX pays higher dividends than RYCCX: FNPIX (0.49) vs RYCCX (0.00). FNPIX was incepted earlier than RYCCX: FNPIX (25 years) vs RYCCX (24 years). RYCCX (2.75) is less costly to investors than FNPIX (1.76). RYCCX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 392.00 vs. FNPIX (178.00). RYCCX has a lower initial minimum investment than FNPIX: RYCCX (2500) vs FNPIX (15000). FNPIX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 23.47 vs. RYCCX (-2.16). FNPIX return over 5 years is better than : 144.34 vs. RYCCX (113.89).
| FNPIX | RYCCX | FNPIX / RYCCX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.76 | 2.65 | 66% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.76 | 2.75 | 64% |
| Fund Existence | 25 years | 24 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 0.844 | -16.502 | -5% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 15000 | 2500 | 600% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 21.2M | 778M | 3% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.49 | 0.00 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | 23.47 | -2.16 | -1,085% |
| Returns for 3 years | 52.22 | 58.57 | 89% |
| Returns for 5 years | 144.34 | 113.89 | 127% |
| Returns for 10 years | 182.21 | 384.84 | 47% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Ad is loading...