Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FNPIX vs RYCCX
FNPIX vs RYCCX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FNPIX vs. RYCCX commentary
Nov 20, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FNPIX is a Hold and RYCCX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RYCCX has more cash in the bank: 1.46B vs. FNPIX (8.72M). FNPIX pays higher dividends than RYCCX: FNPIX (0.44) vs RYCCX (0.00). FNPIX was incepted earlier than RYCCX: FNPIX (25 years) vs RYCCX (25 years). RYCCX (2.62) is less costly to investors than FNPIX (1.76). RYCCX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 383.00 vs. FNPIX (313.00). RYCCX has a lower initial minimum investment than FNPIX: RYCCX (2500) vs FNPIX (15000). RYCCX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 20.50 vs. FNPIX (-0.89). RYCCX (98.81) and FNPIX (98.54) have equivalent 5 years return.
| FNPIX | RYCCX | FNPIX / RYCCX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.76 | 2.50 | 70% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.76 | 2.62 | 67% |
| Fund Existence | 25 years | 25 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 6.074 | 25.369 | 24% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 15000 | 2500 | 600% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 8.72M | 1.46B | 1% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.44 | 0.00 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | -0.89 | 20.50 | -4% |
| Returns for 3 years | 66.36 | 204.24 | 32% |
| Returns for 5 years | 98.54 | 98.81 | 100% |
| Returns for 10 years | 196.65 | 575.00 | 34% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement