FNWB
Price
$7.11
Change
-$0.09 (-1.25%)
Updated
Sep 5, 04:25 PM (EDT)
Capitalization
63.21M
47 days until earnings call
UCB
Price
$33.29
Change
-$0.29 (-0.86%)
Updated
Sep 5, 04:59 PM (EDT)
Capitalization
4.04B
46 days until earnings call
Interact to see
Advertisement

FNWB vs UCB

Header iconFNWB vs UCB Comparison
Open Charts FNWB vs UCBBanner chart's image
First Northwest Ban
Price$7.11
Change-$0.09 (-1.25%)
Volume$100
Capitalization63.21M
United Community Banks
Price$33.29
Change-$0.29 (-0.86%)
Volume$2.85K
Capitalization4.04B
FNWB vs UCB Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
FNWB
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
UCB
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
FNWB vs. UCB commentary
Sep 06, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FNWB is a Hold and UCB is a Buy.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Sep 06, 2025
Stock price -- (FNWB: $7.20 vs. UCB: $33.58)
Brand notoriety: FNWB and UCB are both not notable
Both companies represent the Regional Banks industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: FNWB: 131% vs. UCB: 57%
Market capitalization -- FNWB: $63.21M vs. UCB: $4.04B
FNWB [@Regional Banks] is valued at $63.21M. UCB’s [@Regional Banks] market capitalization is $4.04B. The market cap for tickers in the [@Regional Banks] industry ranges from $167.95B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Regional Banks] industry is $7.8B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

FNWB’s FA Score shows that 1 FA rating(s) are green whileUCB’s FA Score has 1 green FA rating(s).

  • FNWB’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
  • UCB’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
According to our system of comparison, UCB is a better buy in the long-term than FNWB.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

FNWB’s TA Score shows that 4 TA indicator(s) are bullish while UCB’s TA Score has 6 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • FNWB’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 6 bearish.
  • UCB’s TA Score: 6 bullish, 4 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, UCB is a better buy in the short-term than FNWB.

Price Growth

FNWB (@Regional Banks) experienced а -6.49% price change this week, while UCB (@Regional Banks) price change was +0.27% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Regional Banks industry was +0.37%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +4.96%, and the average quarterly price growth was +13.06%.

Reported Earning Dates

FNWB is expected to report earnings on Oct 22, 2025.

UCB is expected to report earnings on Oct 21, 2025.

Industries' Descriptions

@Regional Banks (+0.37% weekly)

Regional banks have a smaller reach than major banks, and cater mostly to one region of a country, such as a state or within a group of states. They offer services often similar – albeit with some limitations/smaller scale – compared to major banks. Taking deposits, making loans, mortgages, leases, credit cards , fund management, insurance and investment banking. SunTrust Banks, State Street Corp., M&T Bank Corp. are some examples of U.S. regional banks.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
UCB($4.04B) has a higher market cap than FNWB($63.2M). FNWB has higher P/E ratio than UCB: FNWB (43.38) vs UCB (15.13). UCB YTD gains are higher at: 5.704 vs. FNWB (-28.490). UCB has more cash in the bank: 198M vs. FNWB (16.8M). UCB has less debt than FNWB: UCB (155M) vs FNWB (360M). UCB has higher revenues than FNWB: UCB (953M) vs FNWB (65.2M).
FNWBUCBFNWB / UCB
Capitalization63.2M4.04B2%
EBITDAN/AN/A-
Gain YTD-28.4905.704-499%
P/E Ratio43.3815.13287%
Revenue65.2M953M7%
Total Cash16.8M198M8%
Total Debt360M155M232%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
FNWB vs UCB: Fundamental Ratings
FNWB
UCB
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
587
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
88
Overvalued
82
Overvalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
10050
SMR RATING
1..100
9113
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
8546
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
377
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
3450

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

UCB's Valuation (82) in the Regional Banks industry is in the same range as FNWB (88) in the Savings Banks industry. This means that UCB’s stock grew similarly to FNWB’s over the last 12 months.

UCB's Profit vs Risk Rating (50) in the Regional Banks industry is somewhat better than the same rating for FNWB (100) in the Savings Banks industry. This means that UCB’s stock grew somewhat faster than FNWB’s over the last 12 months.

UCB's SMR Rating (13) in the Regional Banks industry is significantly better than the same rating for FNWB (91) in the Savings Banks industry. This means that UCB’s stock grew significantly faster than FNWB’s over the last 12 months.

UCB's Price Growth Rating (46) in the Regional Banks industry is somewhat better than the same rating for FNWB (85) in the Savings Banks industry. This means that UCB’s stock grew somewhat faster than FNWB’s over the last 12 months.

FNWB's P/E Growth Rating (3) in the Savings Banks industry is significantly better than the same rating for UCB (77) in the Regional Banks industry. This means that FNWB’s stock grew significantly faster than UCB’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
FNWBUCB
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
59%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
65%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
55%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
70%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
62%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
58%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
63%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
59%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
61%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
68%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
61%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
58%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 22 days ago
64%
Bullish Trend 10 days ago
60%
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
65%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
70%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
63%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
72%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
64%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
55%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
FNWB
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
UCB
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
STOCK / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
GBLBY8.89N/A
N/A
Groupe Bruxelles Lambert SA
PVLUF10.02N/A
N/A
Partners Value Invts LP
YONXF26.80N/A
N/A
Yonex Company Ltd.
PTMEY1.30N/A
N/A
PT Media Nusantara Citra TBK
DTZZF0.05N/A
-0.98%
Dotz Nano Ltd.

FNWB and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, FNWB has been loosely correlated with OZKAP. These tickers have moved in lockstep 38% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if FNWB jumps, then OZKAP could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To FNWB
1D Price
Change %
FNWB100%
-2.70%
OZKAP - FNWB
38%
Loosely correlated
+0.76%
AX - FNWB
37%
Loosely correlated
+1.82%
UCB - FNWB
36%
Loosely correlated
+1.82%
CMA - FNWB
36%
Loosely correlated
+0.87%
PNC - FNWB
36%
Loosely correlated
+1.15%
More

UCB and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, UCB has been closely correlated with FNB. These tickers have moved in lockstep 92% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if UCB jumps, then FNB could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To UCB
1D Price
Change %
UCB100%
+1.82%
FNB - UCB
92%
Closely correlated
+1.88%
HWC - UCB
92%
Closely correlated
+1.89%
WSFS - UCB
92%
Closely correlated
+1.95%
UBSI - UCB
91%
Closely correlated
+1.58%
ABCB - UCB
91%
Closely correlated
+2.24%
More