FNWB
Price
$10.28
Change
-$0.14 (-1.34%)
Updated
Apr 3, 02:17 PM (EDT)
Capitalization
149.01M
20 days until earnings call
USB
Price
$39.64
Change
-$3.37 (-7.84%)
Updated
Apr 3, 02:41 PM (EDT)
Capitalization
68.49B
13 days until earnings call
Ad is loading...

FNWB vs USB

Header iconFNWB vs USB Comparison
Open Charts FNWB vs USBBanner chart's image
First Northwest Ban
Price$10.28
Change-$0.14 (-1.34%)
Volume$110
Capitalization149.01M
US Ban
Price$39.64
Change-$3.37 (-7.84%)
Volume$8.15K
Capitalization68.49B
FNWB vs USB Comparison Chart
Loading...
FNWB
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
USB
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
FNWB vs. USB commentary
Apr 03, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FNWB is a Buy and USB is a Hold.

Ad is loading...
COMPARISON
Comparison
Apr 03, 2025
Stock price -- (FNWB: $10.42 vs. USB: $43.01)
Brand notoriety: FNWB: Not notable vs. USB: Notable
Both companies represent the Regional Banks industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: FNWB: 115% vs. USB: 94%
Market capitalization -- FNWB: $149.01M vs. USB: $68.49B
FNWB [@Regional Banks] is valued at $149.01M. USB’s [@Regional Banks] market capitalization is $68.49B. The market cap for tickers in the [@Regional Banks] industry ranges from $133.96B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Regional Banks] industry is $5.93B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

FNWB’s FA Score shows that 1 FA rating(s) are green whileUSB’s FA Score has 1 green FA rating(s).

  • FNWB’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
  • USB’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
According to our system of comparison, FNWB is a better buy in the long-term than USB.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

FNWB’s TA Score shows that 5 TA indicator(s) are bullish while USB’s TA Score has 6 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • FNWB’s TA Score: 5 bullish, 4 bearish.
  • USB’s TA Score: 6 bullish, 3 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, USB is a better buy in the short-term than FNWB.

Price Growth

FNWB (@Regional Banks) experienced а +2.66% price change this week, while USB (@Regional Banks) price change was -0.56% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Regional Banks industry was -2.02%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was -1.18%, and the average quarterly price growth was +6.14%.

Reported Earning Dates

FNWB is expected to report earnings on Apr 23, 2025.

USB is expected to report earnings on Apr 16, 2025.

Industries' Descriptions

@Regional Banks (-2.02% weekly)

Regional banks have a smaller reach than major banks, and cater mostly to one region of a country, such as a state or within a group of states. They offer services often similar – albeit with some limitations/smaller scale – compared to major banks. Taking deposits, making loans, mortgages, leases, credit cards , fund management, insurance and investment banking. SunTrust Banks, State Street Corp., M&T Bank Corp. are some examples of U.S. regional banks.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
USB($68.5B) has a higher market cap than FNWB($149M). FNWB has higher P/E ratio than USB: FNWB (60.69) vs USB (13.44). FNWB YTD gains are higher at: 2.764 vs. USB (-9.001). FNWB has less debt than USB: FNWB (321M) vs USB (62.9B). USB has higher revenues than FNWB: USB (28B) vs FNWB (65.5M).
FNWBUSBFNWB / USB
Capitalization149M68.5B0%
EBITDAN/AN/A-
Gain YTD2.764-9.001-31%
P/E Ratio60.6913.44452%
Revenue65.5M28B0%
Total Cash20.6MN/A-
Total Debt321M62.9B1%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
FNWB vs USB: Fundamental Ratings
FNWB
USB
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
6520
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
35
Fair valued
63
Fair valued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
10058
SMR RATING
1..100
803
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
6161
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
264
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
n/an/a

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

FNWB's Valuation (35) in the Savings Banks industry is in the same range as USB (63) in the Major Banks industry. This means that FNWB’s stock grew similarly to USB’s over the last 12 months.

USB's Profit vs Risk Rating (58) in the Major Banks industry is somewhat better than the same rating for FNWB (100) in the Savings Banks industry. This means that USB’s stock grew somewhat faster than FNWB’s over the last 12 months.

USB's SMR Rating (3) in the Major Banks industry is significantly better than the same rating for FNWB (80) in the Savings Banks industry. This means that USB’s stock grew significantly faster than FNWB’s over the last 12 months.

USB's Price Growth Rating (61) in the Major Banks industry is in the same range as FNWB (61) in the Savings Banks industry. This means that USB’s stock grew similarly to FNWB’s over the last 12 months.

FNWB's P/E Growth Rating (2) in the Savings Banks industry is somewhat better than the same rating for USB (64) in the Major Banks industry. This means that FNWB’s stock grew somewhat faster than USB’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
FNWBUSB
RSI
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
84%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
62%
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
65%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
64%
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
70%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
67%
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
65%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
61%
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
60%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
59%
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
62%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 16 days ago
66%
Bullish Trend 11 days ago
59%
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 9 days ago
65%
Bearish Trend 7 days ago
59%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
61%
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
65%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 7 days ago
59%
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
66%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Ad is loading...
FNWB
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
USB
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
STOCK / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
DRCT0.660.02
+2.66%
Direct Digital Holdings
RRR43.070.95
+2.26%
Red Rock Resorts
AVNS14.520.17
+1.18%
Avanos Medical
MT29.070.08
+0.28%
ArcelorMittal
MIRA0.95-0.01
-0.73%
MIRA Pharmaceuticals

FNWB and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, FNWB has been loosely correlated with WNEB. These tickers have moved in lockstep 42% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if FNWB jumps, then WNEB could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To FNWB
1D Price
Change %
FNWB100%
+2.66%
WNEB - FNWB
42%
Loosely correlated
+0.43%
USB - FNWB
39%
Loosely correlated
+2.97%
NFBK - FNWB
38%
Loosely correlated
+0.64%
OZKAP - FNWB
38%
Loosely correlated
+0.61%
BOKF - FNWB
38%
Loosely correlated
+0.32%
More