Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FNWFX vs JEMGX
FNWFX vs JEMGX Comparison
Open Charts FNWFX vs JEMGX
FNWFX vs JEMGX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FNWFX vs. JEMGX commentary
Jun 17, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FNWFX is a Hold and JEMGX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FNWFX has more cash in the bank: 90.9B vs. JEMGX (1.62B). JEMGX pays higher dividends than FNWFX: JEMGX (1.69) vs FNWFX (1.24). FNWFX was incepted earlier than JEMGX: FNWFX (9 years) vs JEMGX (11 years). JEMGX (1.06) is less costly to investors than FNWFX (0.57). FNWFX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 46.00 vs. JEMGX (33.00). FNWFX (1000000) and JEMGX (1000000) have matching initial minimum investment requirements. JEMGX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 44.29 vs. FNWFX (27.09). FNWFX return over 5 years is better than : 19.94 vs. JEMGX (-2.89).
| FNWFX | JEMGX | FNWFX / JEMGX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.57 | 0.90 | 63% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.57 | 1.06 | 54% |
| Fund Existence | 9 years | 11 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 16.851 | 28.161 | 60% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1000000 | 1000000 | 100% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 90.9B | 1.62B | 5,618% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 1.24 | 1.69 | 74% |
| Returns for 1 year | 27.09 | 44.29 | 61% |
| Returns for 3 years | 51.80 | 58.15 | 89% |
| Returns for 5 years | 19.94 | -2.89 | -691% |
| Returns for 10 years | N/A | 83.67 | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement