Ad is loading...
FNWFX vs REMCX
FNWFX vs REMCX Comparison
Open Charts FNWFX vs REMCX
American Funds New World F3
Price$81.74
Change+$0.22 (+0.27%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets63.85B
Russell Inv Emerging Markets C
Price$15.40
Change+$0.02 (+0.13%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets743.31M
FNWFX vs REMCX Comparison Chart
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FNWFX vs. REMCX commentary
May 11, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FNWFX is a Buy and REMCX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FNWFX has more cash in the bank: 63.8B vs. REMCX (743M). REMCX pays higher dividends than FNWFX: REMCX (1.66) vs FNWFX (1.21). FNWFX was incepted earlier than REMCX: FNWFX (8 years) vs REMCX (26 years). REMCX (2.31) is less costly to investors than FNWFX (0.57). REMCX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 66.00 vs. FNWFX (37.00). REMCX has a lower initial minimum investment than FNWFX: REMCX (0) vs FNWFX (1000000). REMCX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 6.97 vs. FNWFX (3.79). FNWFX return over 5 years is better than : 38.68 vs. REMCX (13.48).
| FNWFX | REMCX | FNWFX / REMCX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.57 | 2.19 | 26% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.57 | 2.31 | 25% |
| Fund Existence | 8 years | 26 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 6.128 | 6.501 | 94% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1000000 | 0 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 63.8B | 743M | 8,587% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 1.21 | 1.66 | 73% |
| Returns for 1 year | 3.79 | 6.97 | 54% |
| Returns for 3 years | 26.93 | 13.82 | 195% |
| Returns for 5 years | 38.68 | 13.48 | 287% |
| Returns for 10 years | N/A | -4.01 | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Ad is loading...