Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FOFZX vs MDXBX
FOFZX vs MDXBX Comparison
Open Charts FOFZX vs MDXBX
Franklin OR Tax Free Income Adv
Price$10.28
Change+$0.02 (+0.19%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets802.95M
T. Rowe Price Maryland Tax-Free Bond
Price$9.92
Change+$0.02 (+0.20%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets2.32B
FOFZX vs MDXBX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FOFZX vs. MDXBX commentary
Sep 11, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FOFZX is a Hold and MDXBX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
MDXBX has more cash in the bank: 2.32B vs. FOFZX (803M). FOFZX (3.57) and MDXBX (3.50) have matching dividends . FOFZX was incepted earlier than MDXBX: FOFZX (16 years) vs MDXBX (38 years). FOFZX (0.56) is less costly to investors than MDXBX (0.53). MDXBX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 17.30 vs. FOFZX (11.31). MDXBX has a lower initial minimum investment than FOFZX: MDXBX (2500) vs FOFZX (100000). MDXBX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 0.25 vs. FOFZX (-0.14). MDXBX return over 5 years is better than : 4.17 vs. FOFZX (-3.28).
| FOFZX | MDXBX | FOFZX / MDXBX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.56 | 0.49 | 114% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.56 | 0.53 | 106% |
| Fund Existence | 16 years | 38 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 0.371 | 0.538 | 69% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 100000 | 2500 | 4,000% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 803M | 2.32B | 35% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 3.57 | 3.50 | 102% |
| Returns for 1 year | -0.14 | 0.25 | -58% |
| Returns for 3 years | 7.50 | 10.51 | 71% |
| Returns for 5 years | -3.28 | 4.17 | -79% |
| Returns for 10 years | 0.65 | 15.35 | 4% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers