Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FOGLX vs RBCTX
FOGLX vs RBCTX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FOGLX vs. RBCTX commentary
Sep 17, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FOGLX is a Hold and RBCTX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RBCTX has more cash in the bank: 15.2B vs. FOGLX (1.11B). FOGLX pays higher dividends than RBCTX: FOGLX (2.71) vs RBCTX (1.79). FOGLX was incepted earlier than RBCTX: FOGLX (8 years) vs RBCTX (19 years). RBCTX (1.39) is less costly to investors than FOGLX (0.28). FOGLX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 17.00 vs. RBCTX (5.00). FOGLX has a lower initial minimum investment than RBCTX: FOGLX (0) vs RBCTX (250). RBCTX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 6.91 vs. FOGLX (5.95). RBCTX return over 5 years is better than : 17.36 vs. FOGLX (7.47).
| FOGLX | RBCTX | FOGLX / RBCTX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.28 | 1.39 | 20% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.28 | 1.39 | 20% |
| Fund Existence | 8 years | 19 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 8.960 | 11.170 | 80% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 250 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 1.11B | 15.2B | 7% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 2.71 | 1.79 | 152% |
| Returns for 1 year | 5.95 | 6.91 | 86% |
| Returns for 3 years | 29.61 | 25.85 | 115% |
| Returns for 5 years | 7.47 | 17.36 | 43% |
| Returns for 10 years | N/A | 40.93 | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement