Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FOGLX vs RBCTX
FOGLX vs RBCTX Comparison Chart
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FOGLX vs. RBCTX commentary
Jun 07, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FOGLX is a Hold and RBCTX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RBCTX has more cash in the bank: 15B vs. FOGLX (1.1B). FOGLX pays higher dividends than RBCTX: FOGLX (2.84) vs RBCTX (1.87). FOGLX was incepted earlier than RBCTX: FOGLX (8 years) vs RBCTX (18 years). RBCTX (1.39) is less costly to investors than FOGLX (0.29). FOGLX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 14.00 vs. RBCTX (5.00). FOGLX has a lower initial minimum investment than RBCTX: FOGLX (0) vs RBCTX (250). RBCTX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 6.57 vs. FOGLX (3.92). RBCTX return over 5 years is better than : 13.80 vs. FOGLX (6.58).
| FOGLX | RBCTX | FOGLX / RBCTX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.29 | 1.39 | 21% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.29 | 1.39 | 21% |
| Fund Existence | 8 years | 18 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 2.570 | 4.939 | 52% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 250 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 1.1B | 15B | 7% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 2.84 | 1.87 | 152% |
| Returns for 1 year | 3.92 | 6.57 | 60% |
| Returns for 3 years | 13.78 | 11.82 | 117% |
| Returns for 5 years | 6.58 | 13.80 | 48% |
| Returns for 10 years | N/A | 28.75 | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers