Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FOGLX vs RRCTX
FOGLX vs RRCTX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FOGLX vs. RRCTX commentary
Nov 20, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FOGLX is a Hold and RRCTX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RRCTX has more cash in the bank: 14.7B vs. FOGLX (1.11B). RRCTX (2.71) and FOGLX (2.63) have matching dividends . FOGLX was incepted earlier than RRCTX: FOGLX (8 years) vs RRCTX (16 years). RRCTX (0.30) is less costly to investors than FOGLX (0.28). FOGLX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 17.00 vs. RRCTX (5.00). FOGLX has a lower initial minimum investment than RRCTX: FOGLX (0) vs RRCTX (250). RRCTX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 8.80 vs. FOGLX (6.72). RRCTX return over 5 years is better than : 19.12 vs. FOGLX (3.01).
| FOGLX | RRCTX | FOGLX / RRCTX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.28 | 0.30 | 93% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.28 | 0.30 | 93% |
| Fund Existence | 8 years | 16 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 8.960 | 11.887 | 75% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 250 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 1.11B | 14.7B | 8% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 2.63 | 2.71 | 97% |
| Returns for 1 year | 6.72 | 8.80 | 76% |
| Returns for 3 years | 28.54 | 27.74 | 103% |
| Returns for 5 years | 3.01 | 19.12 | 16% |
| Returns for 10 years | N/A | 45.89 | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers