Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FOGLX vs RRCTX
FOGLX vs RRCTX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FOGLX vs. RRCTX commentary
Sep 17, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FOGLX is a Hold and RRCTX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RRCTX (2.76) and FOGLX (2.71) have matching dividends . FOGLX was incepted earlier than RRCTX: FOGLX (8 years) vs RRCTX (16 years). RRCTX (0.30) is less costly to investors than FOGLX (0.28). FOGLX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 17.00 vs. RRCTX (5.00). FOGLX has a lower initial minimum investment than RRCTX: FOGLX (0) vs RRCTX (250). RRCTX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 8.11 vs. FOGLX (5.95). RRCTX return over 5 years is better than : 22.96 vs. FOGLX (7.47).
| FOGLX | RRCTX | FOGLX / RRCTX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.28 | 0.30 | 93% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.28 | 0.30 | 93% |
| Fund Existence | 8 years | 16 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 8.960 | 12.036 | 74% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 250 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 1.11B | N/A | - |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 2.71 | 2.76 | 98% |
| Returns for 1 year | 5.95 | 8.11 | 73% |
| Returns for 3 years | 29.61 | 29.44 | 101% |
| Returns for 5 years | 7.47 | 22.96 | 33% |
| Returns for 10 years | N/A | 50.45 | - |