Ad is loading...
FOPAX vs OSMNX
FOPAX vs OSMNX Comparison
Open Charts FOPAX vs OSMNX
Fidelity Advisor Intl Sm Cap Opps A
Price$19.17
Change+$1.01 (+5.56%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets1.33B
Invesco International Small-Mid Com R
Price$33.38
Change+$1.68 (+5.30%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets3.09B
FOPAX vs OSMNX Comparison Chart
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FOPAX vs. OSMNX commentary
Apr 11, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FOPAX is a Hold and OSMNX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
OSMNX has more cash in the bank: 3.09B vs. FOPAX (1.33B). FOPAX (1.20) and OSMNX (1.19) have matching dividends . FOPAX was incepted earlier than OSMNX: FOPAX (20 years) vs OSMNX (24 years). OSMNX (1.63) is less costly to investors than FOPAX (1.25). FOPAX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 27.00 vs. OSMNX (21.00). FOPAX has a lower initial minimum investment than OSMNX: FOPAX (0) vs OSMNX (1000). FOPAX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : -8.48 vs. OSMNX (-18.84). FOPAX return over 5 years is better than : 10.87 vs. OSMNX (-13.63).
| FOPAX | OSMNX | FOPAX / OSMNX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.25 | 1.63 | 77% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.25 | 1.63 | 77% |
| Fund Existence | 20 years | 24 years | - |
| Gain YTD | -5.269 | -5.430 | 97% |
| Front Load | 6% | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 1000 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 1.33B | 3.09B | 43% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 1.20 | 1.19 | 101% |
| Returns for 1 year | -8.48 | -18.84 | 45% |
| Returns for 3 years | -11.72 | -25.38 | 46% |
| Returns for 5 years | 10.87 | -13.63 | -80% |
| Returns for 10 years | 23.46 | -4.52 | -519% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Ad is loading...
Interesting Tickers