Intraday BUY SELL Signals
Intraday BUY SELL Signals
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FORH vs TMAT
FORH vs TMAT Comparison
Open Charts FORH vs TMAT
Main Thematic Innovation ETF
Price$25.07
Change+$0.07 (+0.28%)
Volume$600
Net Assets201.56M
FORH vs TMAT Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FORH vs. TMAT commentary
Nov 20, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FORH is a Hold and TMAT is a Hold.
SUMMARIES
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
TMAT has more net assets: 202M vs. FORH (19.9M). TMAT has a higher annual dividend yield than FORH: TMAT (19.982) vs FORH (14.629). FORH was incepted earlier than TMAT: FORH (5 years) vs TMAT (5 years). TMAT (0.85) has a lower expense ratio than FORH (1.19). FORH has a higher turnover TMAT (39.00) vs TMAT (39.00).
| FORH | TMAT | FORH / TMAT | |
| Gain YTD | 14.629 | 19.982 | 73% |
| Net Assets | 19.9M | 202M | 10% |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.19 | 0.85 | 140% |
| Turnover | 60.62 | 39.00 | 155% |
| Yield | 0.00 | 0.00 | - |
| Fund Existence | 5 years | 5 years | - |
TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
| FORH | TMAT | |
|---|---|---|
| RSI ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 90% | 2 days ago 90% |
| Stochastic ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 82% | 2 days ago 88% |
| Momentum ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 83% | 2 days ago 86% |
| MACD ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 84% | 2 days ago 83% |
| TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 73% | 2 days ago 83% |
| TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 72% | 2 days ago 83% |
| Advances ODDS (%) | 8 days ago 80% | 10 days ago 87% |
| Declines ODDS (%) | 20 days ago 75% | 2 days ago 83% |
| BollingerBands ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 86% | 2 days ago 84% |
| Aroon ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 81% | 2 days ago 84% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers
FORH and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, FORH has been loosely correlated with BHP. These tickers have moved in lockstep 51% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if FORH jumps, then BHP could also see price increases.
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To FORH | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| FORH | 100% | -3.72% | ||
| BHP - FORH | 51% Loosely correlated | -1.61% | ||
| HOLX - FORH | 18% Poorly correlated | -0.04% | ||
| GNRC - FORH | 16% Poorly correlated | +1.39% | ||
| NICE - FORH | 15% Poorly correlated | -12.58% | ||
| DK - FORH | 15% Poorly correlated | +4.15% | ||
More | ||||
TMAT and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, TMAT has been closely correlated with HOOD. These tickers have moved in lockstep 78% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if TMAT jumps, then HOOD could also see price increases.
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To TMAT | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| TMAT | 100% | -0.43% | ||
| HOOD - TMAT | 78% Closely correlated | -1.44% | ||
| TSM - TMAT | 74% Closely correlated | -1.45% | ||
| NVDA - TMAT | 72% Closely correlated | -2.81% | ||
| CRWD - TMAT | 71% Closely correlated | -3.04% | ||
| NET - TMAT | 71% Closely correlated | -2.83% | ||
More | ||||