FORL
Price
$11.93
Change
+$0.44 (+3.83%)
Updated
Sep 24, 01:30 PM (EDT)
Capitalization
27.23M
IROH
Price
$10.43
Change
+$0.33 (+3.27%)
Updated
Sep 25 closing price
Capitalization
22.58M
Interact to see
Advertisement

FORL vs IROH

Header iconFORL vs IROH Comparison
Open Charts FORL vs IROHBanner chart's image
Four Leaf Acquisition
Price$11.93
Change+$0.44 (+3.83%)
VolumeN/A
Capitalization27.23M
Iron Horse Acquisitions
Price$10.43
Change+$0.33 (+3.27%)
Volume$977
Capitalization22.58M
FORL vs IROH Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
FORL
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
IROH
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
FORL vs. IROH commentary
Sep 26, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FORL is a Buy and IROH is a StrongBuy.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Sep 26, 2025
Stock price -- (FORL: $11.49 vs. IROH: $10.43)
Brand notoriety: FORL and IROH are both not notable
Both companies represent the Financial Conglomerates industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: FORL: 411% vs. IROH: 4%
Market capitalization -- FORL: $27.23M vs. IROH: $22.58M
FORL [@Financial Conglomerates] is valued at $27.23M. IROH’s [@Financial Conglomerates] market capitalization is $22.58M. The market cap for tickers in the [@Financial Conglomerates] industry ranges from $590.24B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Financial Conglomerates] industry is $173.25M.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

FORL’s FA Score shows that 1 FA rating(s) are green whileIROH’s FA Score has 0 green FA rating(s).

  • FORL’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
  • IROH’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
According to our system of comparison, FORL is a better buy in the long-term than IROH.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

FORL’s TA Score shows that 2 TA indicator(s) are bullish while IROH’s TA Score has 5 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • FORL’s TA Score: 2 bullish, 0 bearish.
  • IROH’s TA Score: 5 bullish, 4 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, FORL is a better buy in the short-term than IROH.

Price Growth

FORL (@Financial Conglomerates) experienced а -2.05% price change this week, while IROH (@Financial Conglomerates) price change was +3.22% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Financial Conglomerates industry was +0.60%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was -0.19%, and the average quarterly price growth was +16.53%.

Industries' Descriptions

@Financial Conglomerates (+0.60% weekly)

Financial conglomerates usually encompass a wide range of financial services including (not necessarily limited to) investment banking, insurance, capital raising/underwriting, trading of financial securities, investment advisory services, wealth management of high net-worth individuals, and retail banking. Think Citigroup, American Express Company, ING Group.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FORL($27.2M) has a higher market cap than IROH($22.6M). FORL has higher P/E ratio than IROH: FORL (234.60) vs IROH (208.50). FORL YTD gains are higher at: 3.514 vs. IROH (1.312). FORL has higher annual earnings (EBITDA): -1.15M vs. IROH (-2.18M). IROH has more cash in the bank: 25.2K vs. FORL (9.8K). IROH has less debt than FORL: IROH (2.34M) vs FORL (3.12M). FORL (0) and IROH (0) have equivalent revenues.
FORLIROHFORL / IROH
Capitalization27.2M22.6M120%
EBITDA-1.15M-2.18M52%
Gain YTD3.5141.312268%
P/E Ratio234.60208.50113%
Revenue00-
Total Cash9.8K25.2K39%
Total Debt3.12M2.34M133%
TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
FORLIROH
RSI
ODDS (%)
N/A
N/A
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
23%
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
47%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
48%
MACD
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
43%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
26%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
41%
Advances
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bullish Trend 16 days ago
42%
Declines
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bearish Trend 8 days ago
42%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
14%
N/A
Aroon
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
56%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
FORL
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
IROH
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
STOCK / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
TNGX7.970.17
+2.18%
Tango Therapeutics
UGP3.97N/A
N/A
Ultrapar Participacoes SA
GWW951.71-1.22
-0.13%
WW Grainger
IQST6.03-0.17
-2.74%
Iqstel Inc
NTHI10.37-1.63
-13.58%
Neonc Technologies Holdings Inc

FORL and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that FORL and IROH have been poorly correlated (+33% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that FORL and IROH's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To FORL
1D Price
Change %
FORL100%
N/A
IROH - FORL
33%
Poorly correlated
+3.22%
BKHA - FORL
32%
Poorly correlated
+0.09%
PLTYF - FORL
23%
Poorly correlated
N/A
AACI - FORL
23%
Poorly correlated
+0.03%
EURK - FORL
22%
Poorly correlated
+0.19%
More

IROH and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, IROH has been loosely correlated with IROHU. These tickers have moved in lockstep 60% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if IROH jumps, then IROHU could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To IROH
1D Price
Change %
IROH100%
+3.22%
IROHU - IROH
60%
Loosely correlated
N/A
BAYA - IROH
42%
Loosely correlated
N/A
FORL - IROH
33%
Poorly correlated
N/A
HSPOU - IROH
31%
Poorly correlated
N/A
HSPO - IROH
26%
Poorly correlated
N/A
More