Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FOSBX vs NAESX
FOSBX vs NAESX Comparison
Open Charts FOSBX vs NAESX
Tributary Small Company Instl Plus
Price$30.00
Change+$0.44 (+1.49%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets634.92M
Vanguard Small Cap Index I
Price$116.70
Change+$1.38 (+1.20%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets153.28B
FOSBX vs NAESX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FOSBX vs. NAESX commentary
Jul 18, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FOSBX is a Buy and NAESX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
NAESX has more cash in the bank: 153B vs. FOSBX (635M). NAESX pays higher dividends than FOSBX: NAESX (1.28) vs FOSBX (0.28). FOSBX was incepted earlier than NAESX: FOSBX (15 years) vs NAESX (65 years). FOSBX (1.06) is less costly to investors than NAESX (0.17). FOSBX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 29.00 vs. NAESX (13.00). NAESX has a lower initial minimum investment than FOSBX: NAESX (3000) vs FOSBX (5000000). NAESX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 4.35 vs. FOSBX (-9.00). NAESX return over 5 years is better than : 63.03 vs. FOSBX (35.19).
| FOSBX | NAESX | FOSBX / NAESX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.96 | 0.17 | 565% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.06 | 0.17 | 624% |
| Fund Existence | 15 years | 65 years | - |
| Gain YTD | -2.121 | 0.302 | -703% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 5000000 | 3000 | 166,667% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 635M | 153B | 0% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.28 | 1.28 | 22% |
| Returns for 1 year | -9.00 | 4.35 | -207% |
| Returns for 3 years | 5.07 | 35.91 | 14% |
| Returns for 5 years | 35.19 | 63.03 | 56% |
| Returns for 10 years | 30.01 | 104.94 | 29% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement