Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FOSBX vs NAESX
FOSBX vs NAESX Comparison
Open Charts FOSBX vs NAESX
Tributary Small Company Instl Plus
Price$28.48
Change+$0.01 (+0.04%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets626.52M
Vanguard Small Cap Index I
Price$110.35
Change-$0.18 (-0.16%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets147.56B
FOSBX vs NAESX Comparison Chart
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FOSBX vs. NAESX commentary
Jun 06, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FOSBX is a Buy and NAESX is a StrongBuy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
NAESX has more cash in the bank: 148B vs. FOSBX (627M). NAESX pays higher dividends than FOSBX: NAESX (1.35) vs FOSBX (0.29). FOSBX was incepted earlier than NAESX: FOSBX (14 years) vs NAESX (65 years). FOSBX (1.06) is less costly to investors than NAESX (0.17). FOSBX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 27.00 vs. NAESX (13.00). NAESX has a lower initial minimum investment than FOSBX: NAESX (3000) vs FOSBX (5000000). NAESX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 4.88 vs. FOSBX (-7.27). NAESX return over 5 years is better than : 52.45 vs. FOSBX (17.77).
| FOSBX | NAESX | FOSBX / NAESX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.96 | 0.17 | 565% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.06 | 0.17 | 624% |
| Fund Existence | 14 years | 65 years | - |
| Gain YTD | -7.080 | -3.929 | 180% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 5000000 | 3000 | 166,667% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 627M | 148B | 0% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.29 | 1.35 | 21% |
| Returns for 1 year | -7.27 | 4.88 | -149% |
| Returns for 3 years | -8.00 | 18.26 | -44% |
| Returns for 5 years | 17.77 | 52.45 | 34% |
| Returns for 10 years | 22.29 | 95.90 | 23% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement