Ad is loading...
FOSBX vs NAESX
FOSBX vs NAESX Comparison
Open Charts FOSBX vs NAESX
Tributary Small Company Instl Plus
Price$26.53
Change-$1.86 (-6.55%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets664.75M
Vanguard Small Cap Index I
Price$101.10
Change-$7.24 (-6.68%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets153.45B
FOSBX vs NAESX Comparison Chart
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FOSBX vs. NAESX commentary
Apr 04, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FOSBX is a Hold and NAESX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
NAESX has more cash in the bank: 153B vs. FOSBX (665M). NAESX pays higher dividends than FOSBX: NAESX (1.39) vs FOSBX (0.29). FOSBX was incepted earlier than NAESX: FOSBX (14 years) vs NAESX (65 years). FOSBX (1.06) is less costly to investors than NAESX (0.17). FOSBX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 27.00 vs. NAESX (12.00). NAESX has a lower initial minimum investment than FOSBX: NAESX (3000) vs FOSBX (5000000). NAESX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 1.18 vs. FOSBX (-6.07). NAESX return over 5 years is better than : 115.68 vs. FOSBX (52.27).
| FOSBX | NAESX | FOSBX / NAESX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.96 | 0.17 | 565% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.06 | 0.17 | 624% |
| Fund Existence | 14 years | 65 years | - |
| Gain YTD | -7.374 | -5.833 | 126% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 5000000 | 3000 | 166,667% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 665M | 153B | 0% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.29 | 1.39 | 21% |
| Returns for 1 year | -6.07 | 1.18 | -516% |
| Returns for 3 years | -11.08 | 6.44 | -172% |
| Returns for 5 years | 52.27 | 115.68 | 45% |
| Returns for 10 years | 20.69 | 90.61 | 23% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Ad is loading...