Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FOSFX vs RERGX
FOSFX vs RERGX Comparison
Open Charts FOSFX vs RERGX
Fidelity Overseas
Price$72.88
Change+$0.20 (+0.28%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets6.79B
American Funds Europacific Growth R6
Price$59.69
Change+$0.06 (+0.10%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets132.29B
FOSFX vs RERGX Comparison Chart
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FOSFX vs. RERGX commentary
May 23, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FOSFX is a Buy and RERGX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RERGX has more cash in the bank: 132B vs. FOSFX (6.79B). RERGX pays higher dividends than FOSFX: RERGX (1.45) vs FOSFX (1.24). FOSFX was incepted earlier than RERGX: FOSFX (40 years) vs RERGX (16 years). FOSFX (0.68) is less costly to investors than RERGX (0.47). FOSFX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 35.00 vs. RERGX (30.00). FOSFX has a lower initial minimum investment than RERGX: FOSFX (0) vs RERGX (250). FOSFX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 13.02 vs. RERGX (1.40). FOSFX return over 5 years is better than : 64.50 vs. RERGX (31.59).
| FOSFX | RERGX | FOSFX / RERGX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.68 | 0.47 | 145% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.68 | 0.47 | 145% |
| Fund Existence | 40 years | 16 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 16.102 | 11.113 | 145% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 250 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 6.79B | 132B | 5% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 1.24 | 1.45 | 86% |
| Returns for 1 year | 13.02 | 1.40 | 931% |
| Returns for 3 years | 41.55 | 19.09 | 218% |
| Returns for 5 years | 64.50 | 31.59 | 204% |
| Returns for 10 years | 71.82 | 21.15 | 339% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement