Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FOSFX vs RERGX
FOSFX vs RERGX Comparison
Open Charts FOSFX vs RERGX
Fidelity Overseas
Price$74.11
Change+$0.31 (+0.42%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets7.21B
American Funds EUPAC R6
Price$62.02
Change+$0.35 (+0.57%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets132.86B
FOSFX vs RERGX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FOSFX vs. RERGX commentary
Sep 07, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FOSFX is a Hold and RERGX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RERGX has more cash in the bank: 133B vs. FOSFX (7.21B). FOSFX pays higher dividends than RERGX: FOSFX (1.17) vs RERGX (0.93). FOSFX was incepted earlier than RERGX: FOSFX (41 years) vs RERGX (16 years). FOSFX (0.68) is less costly to investors than RERGX (0.47). FOSFX (35.00) and RERGX (35.00) have comparable annual turnover. FOSFX has a lower initial minimum investment than RERGX: FOSFX (0) vs RERGX (250). FOSFX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 12.44 vs. RERGX (8.50). FOSFX return over 5 years is better than : 44.28 vs. RERGX (12.67).
| FOSFX | RERGX | FOSFX / RERGX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.68 | 0.47 | 145% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.68 | 0.47 | 145% |
| Fund Existence | 41 years | 16 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 18.387 | 15.450 | 119% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 250 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 7.21B | 133B | 5% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 1.17 | 0.93 | 126% |
| Returns for 1 year | 12.44 | 8.50 | 146% |
| Returns for 3 years | 60.22 | 35.83 | 168% |
| Returns for 5 years | 44.28 | 12.67 | 349% |
| Returns for 10 years | 90.91 | 41.46 | 219% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement