Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FOSFX vs RERGX
FOSFX vs RERGX Comparison
Open Charts FOSFX vs RERGX
Fidelity Overseas
Price$75.47
Change-$0.13 (-0.17%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets7.31B
American Funds EUPAC R6
Price$61.62
Change-$0.33 (-0.53%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets136.01B
FOSFX vs RERGX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FOSFX vs. RERGX commentary
Jul 26, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FOSFX is a Hold and RERGX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RERGX has more cash in the bank: 136B vs. FOSFX (7.31B). FOSFX pays higher dividends than RERGX: FOSFX (1.15) vs RERGX (0.95). FOSFX was incepted earlier than RERGX: FOSFX (41 years) vs RERGX (16 years). FOSFX (0.68) is less costly to investors than RERGX (0.47). FOSFX (35.00) and RERGX (35.00) have comparable annual turnover. FOSFX has a lower initial minimum investment than RERGX: FOSFX (0) vs RERGX (250). FOSFX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 17.57 vs. RERGX (10.20). FOSFX return over 5 years is better than : 50.22 vs. RERGX (16.38).
| FOSFX | RERGX | FOSFX / RERGX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.68 | 0.47 | 145% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.68 | 0.47 | 145% |
| Fund Existence | 41 years | 16 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 20.767 | 14.706 | 141% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 250 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 7.31B | 136B | 5% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 1.15 | 0.95 | 122% |
| Returns for 1 year | 17.57 | 10.20 | 172% |
| Returns for 3 years | 56.05 | 31.12 | 180% |
| Returns for 5 years | 50.22 | 16.38 | 307% |
| Returns for 10 years | 83.15 | 30.59 | 272% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement