Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FOSFX vs RERGX
FOSFX vs RERGX Comparison
Open Charts FOSFX vs RERGX
Fidelity Overseas
Price$72.94
Change-$1.21 (-1.63%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets7.06B
American Funds EUPAC R6
Price$59.10
Change-$0.80 (-1.34%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets132.56B
FOSFX vs RERGX Comparison Chart
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FOSFX vs. RERGX commentary
Jun 15, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FOSFX is a StrongBuy and RERGX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RERGX has more cash in the bank: 133B vs. FOSFX (7.06B). RERGX pays higher dividends than FOSFX: RERGX (1.37) vs FOSFX (1.18). FOSFX was incepted earlier than RERGX: FOSFX (41 years) vs RERGX (16 years). FOSFX (0.68) is less costly to investors than RERGX (0.47). FOSFX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 35.00 vs. RERGX (30.00). FOSFX has a lower initial minimum investment than RERGX: FOSFX (0) vs RERGX (250). FOSFX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 12.74 vs. RERGX (3.95). FOSFX return over 5 years is better than : 56.29 vs. RERGX (20.61).
| FOSFX | RERGX | FOSFX / RERGX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.68 | 0.47 | 145% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.68 | 0.47 | 145% |
| Fund Existence | 41 years | 16 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 16.518 | 10.015 | 165% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 250 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 7.06B | 133B | 5% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 1.18 | 1.37 | 86% |
| Returns for 1 year | 12.74 | 3.95 | 323% |
| Returns for 3 years | 57.32 | 26.91 | 213% |
| Returns for 5 years | 56.29 | 20.61 | 273% |
| Returns for 10 years | 77.24 | 23.65 | 327% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement