FOSYF
Price
$0.37
Change
-$0.01 (-2.63%)
Updated
Aug 8 closing price
Capitalization
76.66M
VALE
Price
$10.22
Change
+$0.23 (+2.30%)
Updated
Aug 8 closing price
Capitalization
42.33B
82 days until earnings call
Interact to see
Advertisement

FOSYF vs VALE

Header iconFOSYF vs VALE Comparison
Open Charts FOSYF vs VALEBanner chart's image
Forsys Metals
Price$0.37
Change-$0.01 (-2.63%)
Volume$2.63K
Capitalization76.66M
Vale SA
Price$10.22
Change+$0.23 (+2.30%)
Volume$41.94M
Capitalization42.33B
FOSYF vs VALE Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
FOSYF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
VALE
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
FOSYF vs. VALE commentary
Aug 10, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FOSYF is a Hold and VALE is a StrongBuy.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Aug 10, 2025
Stock price -- (FOSYF: $0.37 vs. VALE: $10.22)
Brand notoriety: FOSYF: Not notable vs. VALE: Notable
Both companies represent the Other Metals/Minerals industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: FOSYF: 15% vs. VALE: 87%
Market capitalization -- FOSYF: $76.66M vs. VALE: $42.33B
FOSYF [@Other Metals/Minerals] is valued at $76.66M. VALE’s [@Other Metals/Minerals] market capitalization is $42.33B. The market cap for tickers in the [@Other Metals/Minerals] industry ranges from $223.12B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Other Metals/Minerals] industry is $2.16B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

FOSYF’s FA Score shows that 0 FA rating(s) are green whileVALE’s FA Score has 2 green FA rating(s).

  • FOSYF’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
  • VALE’s FA Score: 2 green, 3 red.
According to our system of comparison, VALE is a better buy in the long-term than FOSYF.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

FOSYF’s TA Score shows that 4 TA indicator(s) are bullish while VALE’s TA Score has 7 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • FOSYF’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 5 bearish.
  • VALE’s TA Score: 7 bullish, 4 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, VALE is a better buy in the short-term than FOSYF.

Price Growth

FOSYF (@Other Metals/Minerals) experienced а +2.21% price change this week, while VALE (@Other Metals/Minerals) price change was +5.25% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Other Metals/Minerals industry was +4.55%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +12.53%, and the average quarterly price growth was +105.10%.

Reported Earning Dates

VALE is expected to report earnings on Oct 31, 2025.

Industries' Descriptions

@Other Metals/Minerals (+4.55% weekly)

The category includes companies that explore for, mine and extract metals, such as copper, diamonds, nickel, cobalt ore, lead, zinc and uranium. BHP, Rio Tinto and Southern Copper Corporation are major players in this space.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
VALE($42.3B) has a higher market cap than FOSYF($76.7M). VALE YTD gains are higher at: 19.726 vs. FOSYF (-14.352). VALE has higher annual earnings (EBITDA): 10.4B vs. FOSYF (-2.51M). VALE has more cash in the bank: 5.7B vs. FOSYF (6.79M). VALE has higher revenues than FOSYF: VALE (36.6B) vs FOSYF (0).
FOSYFVALEFOSYF / VALE
Capitalization76.7M42.3B0%
EBITDA-2.51M10.4B-0%
Gain YTD-14.35219.726-73%
P/E RatioN/A8.38-
Revenue036.6B-
Total Cash6.79M5.7B0%
Total DebtN/A20.3B-
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
FOSYF vs VALE: Fundamental Ratings
FOSYF
VALE
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
4939
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
72
Overvalued
8
Undervalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
7269
SMR RATING
1..100
9457
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
5649
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
8711
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
46n/a

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

VALE's Valuation (8) in the Steel industry is somewhat better than the same rating for FOSYF (72) in the null industry. This means that VALE’s stock grew somewhat faster than FOSYF’s over the last 12 months.

VALE's Profit vs Risk Rating (69) in the Steel industry is in the same range as FOSYF (72) in the null industry. This means that VALE’s stock grew similarly to FOSYF’s over the last 12 months.

VALE's SMR Rating (57) in the Steel industry is somewhat better than the same rating for FOSYF (94) in the null industry. This means that VALE’s stock grew somewhat faster than FOSYF’s over the last 12 months.

VALE's Price Growth Rating (49) in the Steel industry is in the same range as FOSYF (56) in the null industry. This means that VALE’s stock grew similarly to FOSYF’s over the last 12 months.

VALE's P/E Growth Rating (11) in the Steel industry is significantly better than the same rating for FOSYF (87) in the null industry. This means that VALE’s stock grew significantly faster than FOSYF’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
FOSYFVALE
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
85%
Bearish Trend 5 days ago
82%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
78%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
73%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
81%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
74%
MACD
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
75%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
79%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
71%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
88%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
73%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
78%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
75%
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 11 days ago
88%
Bearish Trend 10 days ago
74%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
78%
Bearish Trend 6 days ago
56%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
87%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
80%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
FOSYF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
VALE
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
ETFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
GK25.040.20
+0.81%
AdvisorShares Gerber Kawasaki ETF
XBJL36.650.16
+0.43%
Innovator US Eq Acclrtd 9 Bffr ETF Jul
DUKH24.320.02
+0.08%
Ocean Park High Income ETF
GXUS51.34N/A
N/A
Goldman Sachs MarketBeta(R) Ttl IntEqETF
ISTB48.57-0.04
-0.08%
iShares Core 1-5 Year USD Bond ETF

VALE and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, VALE has been closely correlated with BHP. These tickers have moved in lockstep 82% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if VALE jumps, then BHP could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To VALE
1D Price
Change %
VALE100%
+2.30%
BHP - VALE
82%
Closely correlated
+1.44%
RIO - VALE
81%
Closely correlated
+1.79%
TECK - VALE
65%
Loosely correlated
-0.51%
FSUGY - VALE
62%
Loosely correlated
+2.76%
GLNCY - VALE
61%
Loosely correlated
+2.65%
More