Ad is loading...
FOTKX vs FRQAX
FOTKX vs FRQAX Comparison Chart
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FOTKX vs. FRQAX commentary
Apr 30, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FOTKX is a Hold and FRQAX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FOTKX has more cash in the bank: 3.11B vs. FRQAX (5.91M). FOTKX pays higher dividends than FRQAX: FOTKX (3.25) vs FRQAX (2.68). FOTKX was incepted earlier than FRQAX: FOTKX (8 years) vs FRQAX (18 years). FRQAX (0.70) is less costly to investors than FOTKX (0.25). FRQAX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 25.00 vs. FOTKX (13.00). FOTKX (0) and FRQAX (0) have matching initial minimum investment requirements. FOTKX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 7.66 vs. FRQAX (7.01). FRQAX (8.70) and FOTKX (8.57) have equivalent 5 years return.
| FOTKX | FRQAX | FOTKX / FRQAX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.25 | 0.70 | 36% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.25 | 0.70 | 36% |
| Fund Existence | 8 years | 18 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 2.531 | 2.498 | 101% |
| Front Load | N/A | 6% | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 0 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 3.11B | 5.91M | 52,613% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 3.25 | 2.68 | 121% |
| Returns for 1 year | 7.66 | 7.01 | 109% |
| Returns for 3 years | 9.43 | 8.25 | 114% |
| Returns for 5 years | 8.57 | 8.70 | 98% |
| Returns for 10 years | N/A | 2.82 | - |