It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).
FOXF’s FA Score shows that 1 FA rating(s) are green whileHLLY’s FA Score has 0 green FA rating(s).
It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.
If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.
FOXF’s TA Score shows that 4 TA indicator(s) are bullish while HLLY’s TA Score has 4 bullish TA indicator(s).
FOXF (@Auto Parts: OEM) experienced а -4.57% price change this week, while HLLY (@Auto Parts: OEM) price change was -0.36% for the same time period.
The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Auto Parts: OEM industry was -2.84%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +2.79%, and the average quarterly price growth was -1.75%.
FOXF is expected to report earnings on Feb 20, 2025.
HLLY is expected to report earnings on Feb 27, 2025.
OEM or Original Equipment Manufacturer of auto parts refers to the original producer of a vehicles components, and so OEM car parts are usually identical to the parts used in producing the vehicle in the first place. OEM parts tend to fit the specifications of a particular model, and their compatibility is often guaranteed by the automaker itself. OEM parts could be more expensive to buy (compared to other vendors’ products) when a consumer goes for replacement. However, increased competition from aftermarket parts/third-party vendors could, in some cases, keep EOM prices in check. The industry might progress further in adopting newer technologies like 3D printing to boost supply chain performance and quality. Aptiv PLC, Magna International Inc. and BorgWarner Inc. are major OEMs for autos.
FOXF | HLLY | FOXF / HLLY | |
Capitalization | 2.19B | 532M | 411% |
EBITDA | 217M | 119M | 182% |
Gain YTD | -55.735 | -43.326 | 129% |
P/E Ratio | 18.31 | 28.06 | 65% |
Revenue | 1.46B | 660M | 222% |
Total Cash | 83.6M | 41.1M | 203% |
Total Debt | 758M | 589M | 129% |
FOXF | ||
---|---|---|
OUTLOOK RATING 1..100 | 15 | |
VALUATION overvalued / fair valued / undervalued 1..100 | 82 Overvalued | |
PROFIT vs RISK RATING 1..100 | 100 | |
SMR RATING 1..100 | 88 | |
PRICE GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 88 | |
P/E GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 2 | |
SEASONALITY SCORE 1..100 | 50 |
Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.
FOXF | HLLY | |
---|---|---|
RSI ODDS (%) | 1 day ago88% | N/A |
Stochastic ODDS (%) | 1 day ago74% | 1 day ago77% |
Momentum ODDS (%) | 1 day ago84% | 1 day ago66% |
MACD ODDS (%) | 1 day ago74% | 1 day ago69% |
TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 1 day ago82% | 1 day ago76% |
TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 1 day ago82% | 1 day ago69% |
Advances ODDS (%) | 1 day ago73% | 12 days ago67% |
Declines ODDS (%) | 6 days ago83% | 6 days ago78% |
BollingerBands ODDS (%) | 1 day ago72% | 1 day ago82% |
Aroon ODDS (%) | 1 day ago79% | 1 day ago74% |
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, FOXF has been loosely correlated with VC. These tickers have moved in lockstep 53% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if FOXF jumps, then VC could also see price increases.
Ticker / NAME | Correlation To FOXF | 1D Price Change % | ||
---|---|---|---|---|
FOXF | 100% | +0.64% | ||
VC - FOXF | 53% Loosely correlated | +0.25% | ||
LEA - FOXF | 49% Loosely correlated | +1.71% | ||
THRM - FOXF | 47% Loosely correlated | +0.12% | ||
BWA - FOXF | 47% Loosely correlated | +1.27% | ||
AXL - FOXF | 45% Loosely correlated | -1.87% | ||
More |
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, HLLY has been loosely correlated with VC. These tickers have moved in lockstep 57% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if HLLY jumps, then VC could also see price increases.
Ticker / NAME | Correlation To HLLY | 1D Price Change % | ||
---|---|---|---|---|
HLLY | 100% | +0.73% | ||
VC - HLLY | 57% Loosely correlated | +0.25% | ||
AXL - HLLY | 53% Loosely correlated | -1.87% | ||
BWA - HLLY | 50% Loosely correlated | +1.27% | ||
DAN - HLLY | 50% Loosely correlated | -0.17% | ||
LEA - HLLY | 50% Loosely correlated | +1.71% | ||
More |