HLLY
Price
$2.81
Change
+$0.06 (+2.18%)
Updated
Oct 4 closing price
32 days until earnings call
LEA
Price
$108.04
Change
+$1.37 (+1.28%)
Updated
Oct 4 closing price
24 days until earnings call
Ad is loading...

HLLY vs LEA

Header iconHLLY vs LEA Comparison
Open Charts HLLY vs LEABanner chart's image
Holley
Price$2.81
Change+$0.06 (+2.18%)
Volume$347.69K
CapitalizationN/A
Lear
Price$108.04
Change+$1.37 (+1.28%)
Volume$520.73K
CapitalizationN/A
View a ticker or compare two or three
HLLY vs LEA Comparison Chart
Loading...
HLLY
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if shorted
Show more...
LEA
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if shorted
Show more...
VS
HLLY vs. LEA commentary
Oct 06, 2024

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is HLLY is a Sell and LEA is a Buy.

COMPARISON
Comparison
Oct 06, 2024
Stock price -- (HLLY: $2.81 vs. LEA: $108.04)
Brand notoriety: HLLY and LEA are both not notable
Both companies represent the Auto Parts: OEM industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: HLLY: 83% vs. LEA: 85%
Market capitalization -- HLLY: $532.21M vs. LEA: $8.26B
HLLY [@Auto Parts: OEM] is valued at $532.21M. LEA’s [@Auto Parts: OEM] market capitalization is $8.26B. The market cap for tickers in the [@Auto Parts: OEM] industry ranges from $52.56B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Auto Parts: OEM] industry is $5.44B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

HLLY’s FA Score shows that 0 FA rating(s) are green whileLEA’s FA Score has 1 green FA rating(s).

  • HLLY’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
  • LEA’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
According to our system of comparison, LEA is a better buy in the long-term than HLLY.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

HLLY’s TA Score shows that 5 TA indicator(s) are bullish while LEA’s TA Score has 6 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • HLLY’s TA Score: 5 bullish, 4 bearish.
  • LEA’s TA Score: 6 bullish, 2 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, LEA is a better buy in the short-term than HLLY.

Price Growth

HLLY (@Auto Parts: OEM) experienced а -7.26% price change this week, while LEA (@Auto Parts: OEM) price change was -4.15% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Auto Parts: OEM industry was -0.61%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +1.50%, and the average quarterly price growth was -5.47%.

Reported Earning Dates

HLLY is expected to report earnings on Nov 06, 2024.

LEA is expected to report earnings on Oct 29, 2024.

Industries' Descriptions

@Auto Parts: OEM (-0.61% weekly)

OEM or Original Equipment Manufacturer of auto parts refers to the original producer of a vehicles components, and so OEM car parts are usually identical to the parts used in producing the vehicle in the first place. OEM parts tend to fit the specifications of a particular model, and their compatibility is often guaranteed by the automaker itself. OEM parts could be more expensive to buy (compared to other vendors’ products) when a consumer goes for replacement. However, increased competition from aftermarket parts/third-party vendors could, in some cases, keep EOM prices in check. The industry might progress further in adopting newer technologies like 3D printing to boost supply chain performance and quality. Aptiv PLC, Magna International Inc. and BorgWarner Inc. are major OEMs for autos.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
LEA($8.26B) has a higher market cap than HLLY($532M). HLLY has higher P/E ratio than LEA: HLLY (28.06) vs LEA (14.91). LEA YTD gains are higher at: -22.058 vs. HLLY (-42.300). LEA has higher annual earnings (EBITDA): 1.48B vs. HLLY (119M). LEA has more cash in the bank: 1.2B vs. HLLY (41.1M). HLLY has less debt than LEA: HLLY (589M) vs LEA (2.92B). LEA has higher revenues than HLLY: LEA (23.5B) vs HLLY (660M).
HLLYLEAHLLY / LEA
Capitalization532M8.26B6%
EBITDA119M1.48B8%
Gain YTD-42.300-22.058192%
P/E Ratio28.0614.91188%
Revenue660M23.5B3%
Total Cash41.1M1.2B3%
Total Debt589M2.92B20%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
LEA: Fundamental Ratings
LEA
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
6
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
18
Undervalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
100
SMR RATING
1..100
65
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
77
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
85
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
95

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
HLLYLEA
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
71%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
66%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
70%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
67%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
60%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
68%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
82%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
66%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
74%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
69%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
74%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
74%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 9 days ago
68%
Bullish Trend 9 days ago
65%
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
77%
Bearish Trend 5 days ago
68%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
77%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
64%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
61%
N/A
View a ticker or compare two or three
Ad is loading...
HLLY
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if shorted
Show more...
LEA
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if shorted
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
ETFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
EUSA95.510.73
+0.77%
iShares MSCI USA Equal Weighted ETF
DSEP39.940.14
+0.35%
FT Cboe Vest US Equity Dp Bffr ETF Sep
DECT31.870.10
+0.32%
AllianzIM U.S. Large Cp Buffer10 Dec ETF
EAPR27.220.08
+0.28%
Innovator Em Mkts Pwr Bffr ETF - Apr
MINT100.320.05
+0.05%
PIMCO Enhanced Short Maturity Active ETF

HLLY and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, HLLY has been loosely correlated with VC. These tickers have moved in lockstep 59% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if HLLY jumps, then VC could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To HLLY
1D Price
Change %
HLLY100%
+2.18%
VC - HLLY
59%
Loosely correlated
+1.78%
DAN - HLLY
59%
Loosely correlated
+2.71%
ADNT - HLLY
54%
Loosely correlated
+1.70%
LEA - HLLY
53%
Loosely correlated
+1.28%
AXL - HLLY
53%
Loosely correlated
+2.62%
More

LEA and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, LEA has been closely correlated with DAN. These tickers have moved in lockstep 82% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if LEA jumps, then DAN could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To LEA
1D Price
Change %
LEA100%
+1.28%
DAN - LEA
82%
Closely correlated
+2.71%
VC - LEA
77%
Closely correlated
+1.78%
MGA - LEA
74%
Closely correlated
+1.76%
ADNT - LEA
71%
Closely correlated
+1.70%
ALV - LEA
69%
Closely correlated
+1.62%
More