Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FPADX vs RNWBX
FPADX vs RNWBX Comparison
Open Charts FPADX vs RNWBX
Fidelity Emerging Markets Idx
Price$13.34
Change-$0.06 (-0.45%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets10.51B
American Funds New World R2
Price$89.55
Change-$0.71 (-0.79%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets74.45B
FPADX vs RNWBX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FPADX vs. RNWBX commentary
Sep 26, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FPADX is a Buy and RNWBX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RNWBX has more cash in the bank: 74.4B vs. FPADX (10.5B). FPADX pays higher dividends than RNWBX: FPADX (2.25) vs RNWBX (0.13). FPADX was incepted earlier than RNWBX: FPADX (14 years) vs RNWBX (23 years). RNWBX (1.67) is less costly to investors than FPADX (0.07). RNWBX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 37.00 vs. FPADX (5.00). FPADX has a lower initial minimum investment than RNWBX: FPADX (0) vs RNWBX (250). FPADX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 21.25 vs. RNWBX (12.27). FPADX return over 5 years is better than : 41.17 vs. RNWBX (28.84).
| FPADX | RNWBX | FPADX / RNWBX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.07 | 1.67 | 4% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.07 | 1.67 | 4% |
| Fund Existence | 14 years | 23 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 28.107 | 21.754 | 129% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 250 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 10.5B | 74.4B | 14% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 2.25 | 0.13 | 1,792% |
| Returns for 1 year | 21.25 | 12.27 | 173% |
| Returns for 3 years | 61.79 | 54.40 | 114% |
| Returns for 5 years | 41.17 | 28.84 | 143% |
| Returns for 10 years | 103.59 | 97.01 | 107% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers